Precarious Communities: Towards a Phenomenology of Extinction

Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 92)

Abstract

“Precarious Communities: Towards a Phenomenology of Extinction” begins by criticizing modern ontological models of community as imprecise and dangerous, as they deny animals and other living beings ethical and communal value. The essay criticizes the idea that community is to be based solely around commonality, such as a shared language or physicality. The essay argues that such a model of community is not to be followed because it promotes a widespread “mode of exclusion” of all life that is not human. Instead, the essay proposes an ontological model of “hybrid communities” that is founded on the interdependence of earth’s species. It is argued that human societies have depended on a close relationship with animals and plants since their inception, just as have all other forms of life. The essay posits that animals exist in a phenomenal world that they impart significance to, just as humans do. In turn, the essay proposes the ethical and political value of life is found in the subject’s ability to form relationships and interact with others and its environment, rather than in a “metaphysical superiority.”

Finally, the essay asks that we recognize the inherent instability on which the interdependence of community is founded. The essay urges us to respect the unknowability of nature, cease our interference with its processes and restructure our model of community to reintegrate ourselves into the workings of our world. Failing to do so in the face of the massive extinction we have caused will lead to a double death of our world and ourselves.

Bibliography

  1. Acampora, R. (1999). Bodily being and animal world: Toward a somatology of cross-species community. In H. Peter Steeves (Ed.), Animal others: On ethics, ontology, and animal life. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. (1993). The coming community (Michael Hardt, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchot, M. (1988). The unavowable community (P. Joris, Trans.). Barrytown: Station Hill Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brogan, W. (2002). The community of those who are going to die. In F. Raffoul & D. Pettigrew (Eds.), Heidegger and practical philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, B. (2008). Onto-Ethologies: The animal environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Chrulew, M. (2014). The philosophical ethology of Dominique Lestel. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 19(3), 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chrulew, M., Bussolini, J., Jeffrey, & Buchanan, B. (Eds.). (2014). The Philosophical Ethology of Dominique Lestel. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 19, 3.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, J. (2009). The beast and the sovereign, volume I (G. Bennington, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Despret, V. (2002). Quand le loup habitera avec l’agneau. Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond/Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  12. Despret, V. (2016). What would animals say if we asked the right questions? (B. Buchanan, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Esposito, R. (2010). Communitas: The origin and destiny of community (T. Campbell, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Evernden, N. (1985). The natural alien: Humankind and environment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Goodall, J. (2011). Hope for the animals and their world: How endangered species are being rescued from the brink. New York: Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger, M. (1995). The fundamental concepts of metaphysics: World, finitude, solitude (W. McNeill & N. Walker, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, M. (1999). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Heise, U. K. (2010). Lost dogs, last birds, and listed species: Cultures of extinction. Configurations, 18, 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (Eds.). (2010). Emergence of multispecies ethnography. Special issue of Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576.Google Scholar
  21. Kohn, E. (2007). How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement. American Ethnologist, 34(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Leopold, A. (1987). The land ethic. InA sand county almanac, and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lestel, D. (2004). L’animal singulier. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  25. Lestel, D. (2007). L’animalité. Paris: L’Herne.Google Scholar
  26. Lingis, A. (1994). The community of those who have nothing in common. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  27. McHugh, S. (2011). Animal stories: Narrating across species lines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). Nature (R. Vallier, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Midgley, M. (1983). Animals and why they matter. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  30. Morin, P. J. (2003). Community ecology. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Naess, A. (1979). Self-realization in mixed communities of humans, bears, sheep, and wolves. Inquiry, 22, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nancy, J.-L.. (1991). The inoperative community. In P. Connor (Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press..Google Scholar
  33. Rose, D. B. (2011). Wild dog dreaming: Love and extinction. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rose, D. B., & van Dooren T. (2010). “Extinctions,” Encyclopedia of geography, 2010. .Sage Publications. Accessed 22 Sep 2010. http://www.sage-ereference.com/geography/Article_n410.html.
  35. Rose, D. B., van Dooren, T., & Chrulew, M. (2017). Extinction studies: stories of time, death, and generations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Shotwell, A. (2016). Against purity: Living ethically in compromised times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, M. (2001). An ethics of place: Radical ecology, postmodernity, and social theory. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, M. (2011a). Dis(appearance): Earth, ethics and apparently (In)significant others. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 23–44.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, M. (2011b). Against ecological sovereignty: ethics, biopolitics, and saving the natural world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steeves, H. P. (1998). Founding community: A phenomenological-ethical inquiry. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas, C. D., et al. (2004, January 8). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427, 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsing, A. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Dooren, T. (2014). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Dooren, T., & Rose, D. B. (2012). Storied-places in a multispecies city. Humanimalia, 3(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
  45. von Uexküll, J. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans, with a theory of meaning (J. D. O’Neil, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  46. Venter, O., et al. (2006). Threats to endangered species in Canada. Bioscience, 56(11), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whatmore, S. (2007). Hybrid geographies: Rethinking the ‘human’ in human geography. In L. Kalof & A. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The animals reader. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laurentian UniversitySudburyCanada

Personalised recommendations