Advertisement

Energy, Wealth, and the American Dream

  • Charles A. S. Hall
  • Kent Klitgaard
Chapter

Abstract

The Americas were the last major liveable continents to be settled by humans. When first Asians («Native Americans» or «Indians») and then Europeans (and those they brought from Africa and Asia as slaves or laborers) settled in the Americas, they found enormous lands empty (or empty-able) of other humans with incredibly rich resources. Having emigrated from relatively densely populated and socially and economically stratified Asia and Europe, the Americas represented enormous resources power capita and the freedom to exploit those resources and hence generate wealth. This of course is a well-known story told to most American children with a focus on the various heroic activities of our ancestors. But it is also a story about energy.

References

  1. 1.
    Martin, P.S. 1973. The discovery of America. Science 179: 969–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tainter, J. 1988. The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diamond, J. 2004. Collapse: How societies choose to fail or survive. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crosby, Alfred. 1986. Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, germs and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zinn, Howard. 1980. A people’s history of the United States. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The two greatest causes for war among the perhaps one third of the colonial population who supported independence was basically resource scarcity – the cutting off of the trans-Allegheny frontier, first in 1763 by means of the Proclamation Act, and then later in 1775, with greater enforcement, with the Quebec act. Open rebellion soon followed.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perlin, J. 1989. A forest journey: The role of wood and civilization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greene, A.N. 2008. Horses at work: harnessing power in industrial America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yergin, Daniel. 1991. The prize: The epic quest for oil, money, and power. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bowles, S., D. Gordon, and T. Weisskop. 1990. After the wasteland. Armonk: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smil, V. 2001. Enriching the earth. Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch and the transformation of western food production. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meadows, D., D. Meadows, and J. Randers. 2004. Limits to growth: The 30-year update. White River: Chelsea Green Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ehrlich, P. 1968. The population bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hubbert, M.K. 1969. Energy resources. In The National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council, Committee on Resources and Man: A Study and Recommendations. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hardesty, J., Norris C. Clement, and Clinton E. Jencks. 1971. The political economy of environmental destruction. Review of Radical Political Economics 3 (4): 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    England, R., and B. Bluestone. 1971. Ecology and class conflict. Review of Radical Political Economics 3 (4): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bowles, S., D. Gordon, and T. Weisskopf. 1990. After the wasteland. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Odum, H.T. 1973. Environment, power and society. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Daly, Herman. 1973. Towards a steady-state economy. London: W.H. Freeman and Company, Ltd. Tables.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cleveland, C., R. Costanza, C. Hall, and R. Kaufmann. 1984. Energy and the U.S. economy. A biophysical perspective. Science 225: 890–897; Hall, C.A.S., C.J. Cleveland and R. Kaufmann. 1986. Energy and Resource Quality: The ecology of the economic process. New York: Wiley Interscience. 577 pp. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jorgenson, D.W., and Z. Grilliches. 1967. The explanation of productivity change. Review of Economic Studies: 249–283.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maddala, G.S. 1965. Productivity and technical change in the bituminous coal industry. Journal of Political Economy: 352–265.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reynolds, D. 2000. Soviet economic decline: Did an oil crisis cause the transition in the Soviet Union? Journal of Energy and Development 24: 65–82.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campbell, C., and J. Laherrere. 1998. The end of cheap oil. Scientific American (March): 78–83.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stern, N. 2007. The economics of climate change. The stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luce, E. 2010 Goodbye, American Dream. The crisis of middle-class America. The Financial Times. 30 July 2010.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brinkbaumer, K., M. Hujer, P. Muller, and T. Schulz. 2010. Is the American dream over? Das Spiegel: 2010.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahmed, N. 2017. Failing states, collapsing systems: BioPhysical triggers of political violence. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles A. S. Hall
    • 1
  • Kent Klitgaard
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Environmental Science & ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Wells CollegeAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations