Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

This chapter sketches in broad strokes and critically examines several aspects of the world of research that pertain to the teaching, learning, understanding, and using of statistics and probability in diverse contexts, both formal and informal. It reflects on the methods and conceptual schemes that underlie the research activity in this field (the how), the topics being researched (the what), and the people carrying out the research (the who). The chapter examines purposes and motivations for different types of studies in statistics education, distinguishing between large-R research that often aims for academic reporting and generalizability versus small-r types of research whose motivation is more on local problems set in a particular context. We illustrate some trends in the field by presenting empirical results from an exploratory qualitative analysis of the text of a body of papers and publications in the field. The chapter points out that the range of what qualifies as research in (or of relevance to) statistics education is much broader than what gets published in leading journals and conferences in our field. It highlights the multiplicity of philosophical foundations and methodologies in use. Some directions for future development and research are outlined, including aspects of statistical literacy, cultural dimensions of statistics education research, the role of practitioner inquiry, and the importance of broad interdisciplinary research in statistics education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ASA (American Statistical Association). (2007). Using statistics effectively in mathematics education research (SMER Report). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/EDU-UsingStatisticsEffectivelyinMathEdResearch.pdf

  • Bennett, C. D., & Dewar, J. M. (2012). An overview of the scholarship of teaching and learning in mathematics. PRIMUS (Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies), 22(6), 458–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehler, R., Ben-Zvi, D., Bakker, A., & Makar, K. (2013). Technologies for enhancing statistical reasoning at the school level. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel-Kreidt, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643–690). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bihan-Poudec, A. (2010). L’enseignement de la statistique: en premier lieu, l’apprenant (Statistical education: Focusing on the learner). Journal of Statistics Education, 9(2). Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ9(2)_Bihan-Poudec.pdf

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantlinger, A. (2014). Critical mathematics discourse in a high school classroom: Examining patterns of student engagement and resistance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazorla, I. M., Kataoka, V. Y., & da Silva, C. B. (2010). Trajetória e perspectivas da educação estatística no Brasil: um olhar a partir do GT12 (The growth of and prospects for statistics education in Brazil: A view from the GT12). In C. E. Lopes, C. Q. S. Coutinho, & S. A. Almouloud (Eds.), Estudos e Reflexões em Educação Estatística (Studies in and reflections on statistics education). Brazil: Mercado de Letras, Florianopolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutinho, C., & Samá, S. (2016). Editorial. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 18(3), 1099–1108. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/emp/issue/view/1658

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2010). Researcher practice: Embedding creative practice within doctoral research in industrial design. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), 1–17. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/200/197

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Clarke, P. (2000). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage (Critical perspectives series: A book series dedicated to Paulo Freire). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2002a). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2002b). Dispositional aspects of coping with interpretive numeracy tasks. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 11(2), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I., & Ograjenšek, I. (2010). Qualitative research in the service of understanding learners and users of statistics. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 372–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Research on teaching and learning statistics. In Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice (pp. 21–43). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Godino, J., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1/2), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S., Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2014). Researchers’ use of statistics in creative and qualitative disciplines. In H. McGillivray, M. Martin, & B. Phillips (Eds.), Australian conference on teaching statistics—Topics from OZCOTS 2008–2012 (pp. 365–384). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, R. (2015). Working at the boundaries of mathematics education and statistics education communities of practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., & Shih, J. C. (2009). Examining the quality of statistical mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobden, S. (2014). When statistical literacy really matters: Understanding published information about the HIV/AIDS epidemic in South Africa. Statistics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 72–82. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/Publications.php?p=SERJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, F. (1998). What is research in statistics education. In Statistical education—Expanding the network: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching of Statistics, ICOTS5 (pp. 801–806).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, F. (2003). Towards a data base of research in statistical education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, F. K., & Wiliam, D. (2002). On the purpose of mathematics education research: Making productive contributions to policy and practice. In L. English (Ed.), International handbook of research in mathematics education (pp. 489–506). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). The role of context and evidence in informal inferential reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1/2), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S., & Cobb, G. W. (2000). Statistics and mathematics: Tension and cooperation. American Mathematical Monthly, 107(7), 615–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D., Reston, E., Cordani, L., & Petocz, P. (2014). A global view of statistics education research. Statistics Education Research Journal, 13(2). Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ13(2)_Editorial.pdf

  • Ograjenšek, I., & Gal, I. (2016). Enhancing statistics education by including qualitative research. International Statistical Review, 84(2), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviani, M. (2002). 1982–2002: From the past to the future. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, ICOTS 6. IASE: Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots6/07_ot.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, D., Garfield, J., delMas, R., Groth, R., Kaplan, J. McGowan, H., & Lee, H.S. (2012). Connecting research to practice in a culture of assessment for introductory college-level statistics. Retrieved from http://www.causeweb.org/research/guidelines/ResearchReport_Dec_2012.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2010). On becoming a statistician: A qualitative view. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M., Garfield, J., & Greer, B. (1996). Data handling. In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 205–238). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, M. (2005, August). Education research meets the gold standard: statistics, education, and research methods after “No Child Left Behind”. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, MN, USA. Retrieved from http://www.matstat.com/teach/Shelley.ppt

  • SRTL. (2017). Research forums. International collaboration for research on statistical reasoning, thinking and literacy [website]. Retrieved from srtl.info

  • Takemura, A. (2013). Activities of Japanese inter-university network for statistical education. Joint IASE/IAOS satellite: Statistics education for progress. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/sat2013/IASE_IAOS_2013_Paper_K5_Takemura_ppt.pdf

  • Vita, A., & Kataoka, V. (2014). Blind students’ learning of probability through the use of a tactile model. Statistics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 148–163. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ13(2)_Vita.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2002). Doing research in statistics education: More than just data. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, ICOTS 6. IASE: Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots6/03_wa.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3–46. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ2(2)_Watson_Callingham.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2000a). Developing concepts of sampling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 44–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2000b). Development of understanding of sampling for statistical literacy. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(1), 109–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2013). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/06-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdf (or just refer to the website at http://wenger-trayner.cp/theory/).

  • Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., delMas, R., Le, L., Isaak, R., Bjornsdottir, A., et al. (2011). Publishing in SERJ: An analysis of papers from 2002–2009. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 5–26. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ10(2)_Zieffler.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Petocz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petocz, P., Reid, A., Gal, I. (2018). Statistics Education Research. In: Ben-Zvi, D., Makar, K., Garfield, J. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Statistics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66193-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66195-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics