Advertisement

Introduction

  • Fatma M. AlHaidari
Chapter
  • 216 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter presents the reasons for and aims in examining business meetings of managers and staff members from a social perspective. The researcher observes two financial organizations: a financial company in Kuwait City and a nonprofit trade organization in Phoenix, Arizona. In the chapter, the author talks about the two key linguistic units of analysis: (1) the agency of managers and staff members, and (2) managers’ and staff members’ performance of power in the business meetings. The last part of the chapter lays out a summary of the researcher’s definitions used in the book.

References

  1. Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahearn, L. (2010). Agency and language. In J. Jaspers, J. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Society and language use (pp. 28–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angouri, J., & Marra, M. (2011). Ok one last thing for today then: Constructing corporate identities in corporate meeting talk. In J. Angouri & M. Marra (Eds.), Constructing identity at work (pp. 85–100). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, J. (1980). The art of decision making. New York: Amacom.Google Scholar
  5. Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2009). The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Harris, S. (1997). Managing language: The discourse of corporate meetings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C., & Planken, B. (2007). Business discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1980). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Castor, T. (2005). Constructing social reality in organizational decision making: Account vocabularies in a diversity discussion. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Debelak, D. (2008). Perfect phrases for meetings. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Dunkerley, K., & Robinson, P. (2002). Similarities and differences in perceptions and evaluations of the communication styles of American and British managers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4), 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duranti, A. (2004). Agency in language. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 451–473). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Fairclough, N. (1991). What might we mean by “enterprise discourse”? In R. Keat & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), Enterprise culture (pp. 38–57). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity (pp. 53–70). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Georgakpoulou, A. (2005). Styling men and masculinities: Interactional and identity aspects at work. Language in Society, 34, 163–184.Google Scholar
  21. Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. (1995). Behavior in organizations: Understanding & managing the human side of work. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Henkel, S. (2007). Successful meetings: How to plan, prepare, and execute topnotch business meetings. Ocala: Atlanta Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Hindle, T. (1998). Managing meetings. New York: DK Publishing..Google Scholar
  24. Holmes, J. (2005). Story-telling at work: A complex discursive resource for integrating personal, professional and social identities. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 671–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes, J. (2008). Gendered discourse at work. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(3), 478–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2005). Narrative and the construction of professional identity in the workplace. In J. Coates & J. Thornborrow (Eds.), The sociolinguistics of narrative: Theory, context and culture in oral story-telling (pp. 193–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  28. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  29. Janner, G. (1986). Janner on meetings: How to make meetings really work. London: Wild-wood House.Google Scholar
  30. Johnsson, H. (1990). Professional communications—For a change. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Jorgenson, J. (2002). Engineering selves: Negotiating gender and identity in technical work. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 350–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koester, A. (2006). Investigating workplace discourse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Koester, A. (2010). Workplace discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  34. Kuwait Central Statistics Administration. (2016, December 31). Kuwait statistics. AlRai Media. http://www.alraimedia.com/ar/pdfs/date/2016/12/31. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  35. Kwon, W., Clarke, I., & Wodak, R. (2009). Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: Integrating across contexts and scales. Discourse & Communication, 3(3), 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mullany, L. (2007). Gendered discourse in the professional workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mumby, D. (1988). Communication and power in organizations. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  38. Mumby, D. (2007). Organizational communication. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 3290–3299). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Myrsiades, L. (1987). Corporate stories as cultural communications in the organizational setting. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(1), 84–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Poncini, G. (2004). Discursive strategies in multicultural business meetings. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  41. Rogers, P. (2001). Convergence and commonality challenge business communication research. Journal of Business Communication, 38(1), 79–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sarangi, S., & Roberts, C. (1999). Talk, work, and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schieffelin, B. (1990). The give and take of everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schwartzman, H. (1986). The meeting as a neglected social form in organizational studies. In L. Cummings & P. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (pp. 233–258). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Schwartzman, H. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwartzman, H. (1993). Ethnography in organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaw, S., & Smith, E. (1974). The law of meetings: Their conduct and procedure. London: Macdonald & Evans.Google Scholar
  48. Sherzer, J., & Darnell, R. (1986). Outline guide for the ethnographic study of speech use. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 548–554). London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Snair, S. (2003). Stop the meeting I want to get off: How to eliminate endless meetings while improving your team’s communication, productivity, and effectiveness. Shantou: Shantou University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Svennevig, J. (2008). Exploring leadership conversations. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 529–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tropman, J. (2003). Making meetings work: Achieving high quality group decisions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as a structure and process (Discourse studies a multidisciplinary introduction). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Van Dijk, T. (2007). Discourse studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and discourse: How context controls text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 144–161). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Van Vree, W. (1999). Meetings manners and civilization: The development of modern meeting behavior. London: University of Leicester Press.Google Scholar
  59. Vine, B. (2004). Getting things done at work: The discourse of power in workplace interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wodak, R. (1989). Language, power and ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15(1), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  63. Wodak, R., & Weiss, G. (2005). Analyzing European Union discourses: Theories and applications. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in critical discourse analysis: Theory, methodology, and interdisciplinary (pp. 121–173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yamada, H. (1992). American and Japanese business discourse: A comparison of interactional styles. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  65. Yeung, L. (2004). The paradox of control in participative decision-making: Facilitative discourse in banks. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 166, 83–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatma M. AlHaidari
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Authority for Applied Education and TrainingKuwait CityKuwait

Personalised recommendations