Differentiating Equality? The Different Advancements in the Protected Grounds in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyses the case law the Court of Justice has issued on the protected grounds of discrimination under Articles 18 and 19 TFEU. In order to do that, for each ground of discrimination (with the exception of religion) a few cases of the case law of the Court of Justice have been taken as examples, with the aim of offering a new perspective on the way in which the Court is dealing with one of the most delicate issues both among scholars and in public opinion. The challenge of this chapter lies on the fact that anti-discrimination law in the EU is like a chorus with several different voices, for which reason the attempt to portray a consistent picture of EU anti-discrimination law is like striving for harmony in an orchestra. Hence in conclusion to this chapter we should be able to understand whether the Court of Justice is forging a ‘new’ concept of equality or whether it is trying to adapt its reasoning to the circumstances of the case at hand, in keeping with the essence of the relational character of the principle of non-discrimination.

Keywords

Non-discrimination Equality EU law Fundamental rights EU Charter of Fundamental Rights European Court of Justice 

References

  1. Acosta Arcarazo D (2011) The long-term residence status as a subsidiary form of EU citizenship: an analysis of directive 2003/109. Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altan L et al (2014) Implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons irrespective of Religion or Belief, Disability, Age or Sexual Orientation—Impact Assessment of the Proposal for a Council Directive on Implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons irrespective of Religion or Belief, Disability, Age or Sexual Orientation, as well as Amendments 37 and 41 of the European Parliament, European Parliamentary Research Service. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/supporting-analyses-search.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2016
  3. Biagioni G (2011) Il principio di non discriminazione in base all’età—In margine al caso Kücükdeveci. In: Castangia I, Biagioni G (eds) Il principio di non discriminazione nel diritto dell’Unione Europea. Editoriale Scientifica, Naples, pp 257–270Google Scholar
  4. Bell M (2011) The principle of equal treatment: widening and deepening. In: Craig P, de Búrca G (eds) The evolution of EU law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 611–639Google Scholar
  5. Benedettelli MV (1989) Il giudizio di eguaglianza nell’ordinamento giuridico delle Comunità Europee. CEDAM, PaduaGoogle Scholar
  6. Berneri C (2014) Protection of families composed by EU citizens and third-country nationals: some suggestions to tackle reverse discrimination. Eur J Migr Law 16:249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Besson S (2008) Gender discrimination under the EU and the ECHR: never shall the twain meet? Hum Rights Law Rev 8:647–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonardi O (2007) Le discriminazioni basate sull’età. In: Barbera M (ed) Il nuovo diritto antidiscriminatorio—Il quadro comunitario e nazionale. Giuffrè Editore, Milan, pp 125–170Google Scholar
  9. Bribosia E, Bombois T (2011) Interdiction de la discrimination en raison de l’âge—Du principe, de ses exceptions et de quelques hesitations. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen 41:41–84Google Scholar
  10. Casolari F (2012) L’azione dell’Unione europea contro le discriminazioni basate sulla religione: l’impatto della giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti umani. Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale 3:475–511Google Scholar
  11. Casolari F (2014) Commento all’art. 23 della Carta dei Diritti Fondamentali dell’Unione Europea. In: Pocar F, Baruffi MC (eds) Commentario breve ai Trattati dell’Unione Europea, 2nd edn. CEDAM, Padua, pp 1731–1734Google Scholar
  12. Craig P (1997) Directives: direct effect, indirect effect and the construction of national legislation. Eur Law Rev 22:519–538Google Scholar
  13. Craig P (2006) EU administrative law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curtin D (1990) Directives: the effectiveness of judicial protection of individual rights. Common Market Law Rev 27:709–739Google Scholar
  15. Danisi C (2015) Tutela dei diritti umani, non discriminazione e orientamento sessuale. Editoriale Scientifica, NaplesGoogle Scholar
  16. de Witte B (2011) Direct effect, primacy and the nature of the legal order. In: Craig P, de Búrca G (eds) The evolution of EU law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 323–362Google Scholar
  17. Di Federico G (2010) La sentenza Kücükdeveci e la vexata quaestio degli effetti orizzontali delle direttive. Rivista Italiana di Diritto del Lavoro 29:1002–1111Google Scholar
  18. Di Federico G (2014) Access to healthcare in the Post-Lisbon Era and the genuine enjoyment of EU citizens’ rights. In: Rossi LS, Casolari F (eds) The EU after Lisbon: amending or coping with the existing treaties? Springer, Heidelberg, pp 177–212Google Scholar
  19. Ellis E, Watson P (2012) EU anti-discrimination law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission (2010) Compilation of case law on the equality of treatment between women and men and discrimination in the European Union, 3rd edn. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  21. Favilli C (2008) La non discriminazione nel diritto dell’Unione Europea. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaja G (1984) Constitutional Court (Italy), Decision No. 170 of 8 June 1984, S.p.a. Granital v. Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato. Common Mark Law Rev 21:756–772Google Scholar
  23. Gallo D et al (eds) (2014) Same-sex couples before national, supranational and international jurisdictions. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  24. Goudappel F (2010) The effects of EU citizenship: economic, social and political rights in a time of constitutional change. T.M.C. Asser Press, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guild E et al (eds) (2009) Illiberal liberal states: immigration, citizenship and integration in the EU. Ashgate, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Hailbronner K, Thym D (2011) Annotation Case C-34/09, Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office National de l’emploi (ONEM). Common Mark Law Rev 48:1253–1270Google Scholar
  27. Hernu R (2003) Principe d’égalité et principe de non-discrimination dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes. LGDJ, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. Howard E (2009) The EU race directive: developing the protection against racial discrimination within the EU. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Kochenov D, Plender R (2012) EU citizenship: from an incipient form to an incipient substance? The discovery of the treaty text. Eur Law Rev 37:369–396Google Scholar
  30. Lansbergen A, Miller N (2011) European citizenship rights in internal situations: an ambiguous revolution? Decision of 8 March 2011, Case C-34/09, Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi. Eur Const Law Rev 7:287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lazzerini N (2015) “Please Handle with Care!”—some considerations on the approach of the European court of justice to the direct effect of general principles of EU law. In: Pineschi L (ed) The general principles of law—the role of the judiciary. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 145–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lenaerts K (2013) The principle of equal treatment and the European court of justice. Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 18:461–482Google Scholar
  33. Mancini GF (1998) Europe: the case for statehood. Eur Law J 4:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maron F, Pozarlik G (eds) (2012) Identités citoyennetés et démocratie : 20 ans après. Bruylant, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin D (2006) Egalité et non-discrimination dans la jurisprudence communautaire : Etude critique à la lumière d’une approche comparatiste. Bruylant, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin D (2011) L’actualité de la jurisprudence européenne et internationale. La Cour de justice et les situations internes à un État membre : vive la révolution? Revue de jurisprudence sociale 1:450–452Google Scholar
  37. Mengozzi P (2011) La sentenza Zambrano: Prodromi e conseguenze di una pronuncia inattesa. Studi sull’integrazione europea 2:417–432Google Scholar
  38. More G (1999) The principle of equal treatment: from market unifier to fundamental right? In: Craig P, de Búrca G (eds) The evolution of EU law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 517–553Google Scholar
  39. Morris R (2011) European citizenship and the right to move freely: internal situations, reverse discrimination and fundamental rights. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 18:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nic Shuibhne N (2010) The resilience of EU market citizenship. Common Mark Law Rev 47:1597–1628Google Scholar
  41. Peers S (2015) Benefits for EU citizens: A U-Turn by the court of justice. Camb Law J 2:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poiares Maduro M (2005) The European court of justice and anti-discrimination law. Anti-Discrim Law Rev 2:21–26Google Scholar
  43. Prechal S (2000) Does direct effect still matter? Common Mark Law Rev 37:1047–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prechal S (2004) Equality of treatment, non-discrimination and social policy: achievements in three themes. Common Mark Law Rev 41:533–551Google Scholar
  45. Prechal S, Burrows N (1990) Gender discrimination law of the European community. Dartmouth Publishing Company, BrookfieldGoogle Scholar
  46. Rossi LS (2010) La sentenza del Bundesverfassungsgericht sul Trattato di Lisbona e le implicazioni sul processo di integrazione europea. In: Rossi LS, Baroncini E (eds) Rapporti fra ordinamenti e diritti dei singoli: Studi degli allievi di Paolo Mengozzi. Editoriale Scientifica, Naples, pp 91–115Google Scholar
  47. Rossi LS (2016) ‘Stesso valore giuridico dei Trattati’? Rango, primato ed effetti diretti della Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell’Unione europea. Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 2:329–356Google Scholar
  48. Schiek D (2005) Broadening the scope and the norms of EU gender equality law: towards a multidimensional conception of equality law. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 12:427–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Solanke I (2012) Using the citizen to bring the refugee In: Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEM). Mod Law Rev 75:101–111Google Scholar
  50. Strazzari D (2008) Discriminazione razziale e diritto: Un’indagine comparata per un modello “europeo” dell’antidiscriminazione. CEDAM, PaduaGoogle Scholar
  51. Tryfonidou A (2009) Reverse discrimination in EC law. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Elsuwege P, Kochenov D (2011) On the limits of judicial intervention: EU citizenship and family reunification rights. Eur J Migr Law 13:443–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ventura M (2011) Law and religion issues in Strasbourg and Luxembourg: the virtues of European courts. ReligioWest Kick-Off Meeting Conference Paper, http://www.eui.eu/Projects/ReligioWest/Documents/events/conferencePapers/Ventura.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2016
  54. Verschueren H (2015) Preventing “benefit tourism” in the EU: A narrow or broad interpretation of the possibilities offered by the ECJ in Dano? Common Mark Law Rev 2:363–390Google Scholar
  55. Vickers L (2007) Religion and belief discrimination in employment: the EU law. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiler JHH (2011) The political and legal culture of European integration: an exploratory essay. Int J Comp Law 9:678–694Google Scholar
  57. Wintemute R (1997) Sexual orientation and human rights: the United States constitution, the European convention, and the Canadian charter. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Wintemute R, Andenæs M (eds) (2001) Legal recognition of same-sex partnerships: a study of national, European and international law. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Yetano M (2014) La dynamique du principe de proportionnalité—Essai dans le contexte des libertés de circulation du droit de l’Union européenne. Institut Universitaire Varenne, Clermont-FerrandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LuxembourgLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations