Advertisement

The Ineffectiveness of the Current Definition of a “Mercenary” in International Humanitarian and Criminal Law

  • José L. Gómez del Prado
Chapter

Abstract

The world is facing today new forms of mercenarism. Non-State armed groups, such as foreign fighters and private military and security companies (PMSCs), operate with impunity in armed conflicts.

In the 1960s, colonial powers recruited mercenaries, particularly in Africa, to crush liberation movements fighting for their independence. Private military and security companies closely linked to the economic interests of the international mining sector have replaced these soldiers of fortune, or dogs of war.

The turning of the century has seen PMSCs increasingly taking part in hostilities and armed conflicts. The revolving door phenomenon between governments and PMSCs, particularly in Western countries, has largely contributed to this phenomenon.

With the globalization of the economy, in the 1980s, governments are increasingly outsourcing to the private sector security and a number of functions considered as the prerogative of the State.

The United Nations has defined the use of mercenaries “as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination.” In order to control this phenomenon, it adopted, in 1989, the International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries.

The UN Convention, however, as well as other international instruments adopted in the mid-twentieth century have become obsolete to deal with the new forms of mercenarism.

This article underscores the difficulties to apply the provisions contained in the definition of the 1989 Convention and emphasizes the need to adopt a new binding international instrument regulating private military and security companies.

References

Books, Book Chapters and Journal Articles

  1. Antonyshyn D, Grofe J, Hubert D (2009) Beyond the law? The regulation of Canadian private military and security companies operating abroad. Priv-War Report CanadaGoogle Scholar
  2. Arte TV (2016a) Daesch parole de deserteurs. Program broadcast on March 15, 2016Google Scholar
  3. Arte TV (2016b) Kosovo, un pays sans avenir? Television program broadcast on March 21, 2016Google Scholar
  4. ATT Monitor (2016) Dealing in double standards. A Project of Control ArmsGoogle Scholar
  5. BBC News (2010) The rise of the UK’s private security companies, November 2, 2010Google Scholar
  6. Bloomberg (2012) Shooting to kill pirates risks Blackwater moment, May 8, 2012Google Scholar
  7. Clapeau P (2006) Les Mercenaires. Collection Histoire, Ed. Ouest FranceGoogle Scholar
  8. Davrichewy K (2016) L’autre Joseph Stalin. Sabine Wespieser Editeur, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Diplock Report (1976) Report of the Committee of Privy Counsellors appointed to inquire into the recruitment of mercenaries. London, August 1976Google Scholar
  10. Duffield M (2004) Las nuevas guerras en el mundo global. Catarata, MadridGoogle Scholar
  11. El País (2016) Una poderosa mafia, March 6, 2016Google Scholar
  12. Gómez del Prado JL (2012) A U.N. Convention to regulate PMSCs? Crim Justice Ethics 31(3):262–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gómez del Prado JL (2011) A United Nations instrument to regulate and monitor private military and security contractors. Notre Dame J Int Comp Hum Right Law 1(1), SpringGoogle Scholar
  14. Guardian (2013) Piracy fears over ships laden with weapons in international waters, January 10, 2013Google Scholar
  15. Hispan TV (2016a) Aviones emiratos atacan por error mercenarios saudíes en Yemen. Nexo Latino, March 6, 2016Google Scholar
  16. Hispan TV (2016b) Fuerzas yemeníes matan a un comandante de mercenarios en Yemen. Nexo Latino, March 7, 2016Google Scholar
  17. Krahmann E (2013) The United States, PMSCs and the state monopoly on violence: leading the way towards norm change. Secur Dialog 44(I)Google Scholar
  18. Le Monde (2006) Bob Denard est condamné à cinq ans de prison avec sursis, 21 June 2006Google Scholar
  19. Lloyd’s List (2013) UK gives go ahead for floating armories, August 8, 2013Google Scholar
  20. Lockwood GH (1977) Report on the trial of mercenaries: Luanda, Angola June, 1976. Manitoba Law J 7(3):183–202Google Scholar
  21. Mother Jones (2008) Blackwater’s World of Warcraft, March/April 2008 issue, motherjones.com
  22. Percy S (2007) Mercenaries. The history of a norm. Oxford University Press, p 177Google Scholar
  23. Radio Canada.ca (2009) Un Silence Qui Derange, 16 June 2009Google Scholar
  24. Saner R (2015) Private military and security companies: industry self-led self-regulatory initiatives versus state-led containment strategies. The Centre on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding, CCDP Working Paper, Geneva, June 2015Google Scholar
  25. Scahill J (2013) Dirty wars, the world is a battlefield; Serpent’s tail. London, pp 481–482Google Scholar
  26. Solomon E, Mhidi A (2015) Au bonheur des trafiquants d’armes. Courier International, No. 1310, December 10, 2015Google Scholar
  27. Swiss Television Temps Present (2005) Guerriers à Louer. Program broadcast in 2005Google Scholar
  28. Voltairenet.org (2016) DynCorp mercenaries replace Academi mercenaries in Yemen, March 18, 2016Google Scholar
  29. War on Want (2016) Mercenaries unleashed. London, January 2016Google Scholar
  30. Weinberg S (1994) Last of the pirates: in search of Bob Denard. LondonGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Cole A (2009) US contractors fired at Kabul Car. Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2009Google Scholar
  2. El País (2015) Así se financia el terror yihadista, November 16, 2015Google Scholar
  3. Gómez del Prado JL (2016) Whether the criteria contained in the 1989 International Convention against the recruitment, use, financing and training of mercenaries notably motivation apply to today’s foreign fighters? Int Community Law Rev 18:400–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Scahill J (2007) Blackwater: the rise of the world’s most powerful mercenary army. Nations Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar

International and Regional Organizations

    African Union

    1. African Union “Protocol on Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights”; African Union Document EX.CL/846(XXV), Annex 5.Google Scholar

    United Nations

      UN General Assembly Resolutions

      1. Resolution 2625 (XXV); Resolution 3314 (XXIX); Resolution 3103(XXVIII)Google Scholar
      2. Resolution 2548(XXIV); Resolution 2395(XXIII); Resolution 2465(XXIII); A/RES/44/34Google Scholar

      UN Documents

      1. A/44/766; A/44/P.V.72; A/C.6/44/SR. 41-42-44 and Corr.1; A/70/330;A/44//43; A/C.6/44/SR.42; A/44/766 Agenda item 144 Report of the Sixth Committee; A/44/P.V.72; A/C.6/44/SR. 41-42-44 and Corr.1; A/63/467; A/67/931; A/70/330Google Scholar
      2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural RightsGoogle Scholar
      3. Treaty Series, Vol. 1125, N° 17512.Google Scholar

      UN Council on Human Rights Documents

      1. E/CN.4/2004/15; E/CN.4/2002/20Google Scholar
      2. A/HRC/4/42/Add.1; A/HRC/4/42/Add.2; A/HRC/7/7/Add.2 A/HRC/7/7/Add.3; A/HRC/7/7/Add.4; A/HRC/15/25/Add.1; A/HRC/18/32/Add.2; A/HRC/18/32/Add.3; A/HRC/24/45; A/HRC/27/50; A/HRC/30/34; A/HRC/30/47; A/HRC/31/68; A/HRC/32/39; A/HRC/33/43Google Scholar

      UN International Criminal Tribunal

      1. UN International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia, CC/PIO/190-E, The Hague, May 7, 1997, TADIC CASE: THE VERDICT.Google Scholar

Online Publications

  1. Corporación Colectivo de Abogados ‘José Alvear Restrepo’ (2007) “Accusation Against the Transnational DynCorp”, Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Session on Colombia, Hearing on Biodiversity, Humanitarian Zone, Cacarica, February 24–27, 2007, see http://www.prensarural.org/spip/spip.php?article673, last accessed January 18, 2012
  2. Gómez del Prado JL (2006) Private security companies: the mercenaries or the corsairs of the XXI century? Published and disseminated on the website of Alai-amlatina. http://www.alainet.org
  3. Scott JB (1909) The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, p 423. http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/210?OpenDocument
  4. The 1856 Paris Declaration in Conventions and Declarations between the Powers Concerning War, Arbitration and Neutrality 10 (1915), http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/105?OpenDocument
  5. The 1907 Hague Convention relating to the Conversion of Merchant Ships into Warships, in Scott, J. B., “The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907”, (1909), p. 423; see http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/210?OpenDocument, last accessed January 9, 2017
  6. The Atlantic (2016) America’s addiction to mercenaries, August 2016. http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/08/iraq-afghanistan-contractor-pentagon-obama/495731/
  7. The Nation (2014) Finally, a Verdict on Blackwater’s Nisour Square Shooters, by Editors October, 24, 2014. https://www.thenation.com/login/

Other Online Sites

  1. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: http://www.ohchr.org
  2. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: http://www.unodc.org
  3. International Committee of the Red Cross: http://www.icrc.org
  4. International Peace Institute: http://www.ipinst.org
  5. Centre for Security, Development and the Rule of Law: http://www.dcaf.net
  6. Private Security Regulation: http://www.privatesecurityregulation.net
  7. International Code of Conduct for Private Security: http://www.icoca.ch
  8. Intelligence Online: http://www.intelligenceonline.com
  9. Sea Marshals official website: seamarshals.comGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.United Nations Working Group on the Use of MercenariesGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations