Abstract
This chapter goes into more detail on the connection between culture, cognition, and emotion, according to the theoretical framework of ecological rationality (Sundararajan, Understanding emotion in Chinese culture: Thinking through psychology. New York, NY: Springer, 2015). It reports the results from psycho-linguistic analysis of the emotional expressions of suffering. Consistent with the ecological rationality hypothesis, which predicted that forms of emotion expression would differ across religious communities, and also consistent with the cognitive differences between the two groups reported in previous chapters, Yi-Christians were found to use relatively more emotional words, whereas Yi-Bimo dwelt relatively more on details of emotion-laden events. Informed by Peircean semiotics, the authors interpret these results in terms of the health implications of religion as a sign system. More specifically, to the extent that their religion capitalizes on external resources (rituals, religious experts, clan, etc.) for the maintenance of its integrity as a sign, the Yi-Bimo are more vulnerable to rapid urbanization, which is destructive of community and inimical to traditional religious symbols—now branded “superstitions” (mi xin). These factors may have contributed to the Yi-Bimo’s relative susceptibility to the pernicious consequences of globalization, such as AIDS and drug addiction.
References
Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: W. W. Norton.
Fonagy, P. (1991). Thinking about thinking: Some clinical and theoretical considerations in the treatment of a borderline patient. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72(Pt 4), 639–656.
Hoopes, J. (Ed.). (1991). Peirce on signs. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina.
Kirmayer, L. J., Dandeneau, S., Marshall, E., Phillips, M. K., & Williamson, K. J. (2011). Rethinking resilience from indigenous perspectives. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(2), 84–91.
Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. R. (1994). Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence. Washington, DC: APA.
Liu, S. H. (2011). Passage to manhood: Youth migration, heroin, and AIDS in Southwest China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ortony, A., Clore, G., & Foss, M. A. (1987). The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cognitive Science, 11, 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(87)80010-1.
Pargament, K. I. (2001). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Parmentier, R. J. (1994). Signs in society/studies in semiotic anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multi-level sequential checking. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scherer, K. R., Wallbott, H. G., & Summerfield, A. R. (1986). Experiencing emotion: A cross-cultural study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sifneos, P. E. (1967). Clinical observations on some patients suffering from a variety of psychosomatic diseases. Acta Medicina Psychosomatica, 7, 1–10.
Sundararajan, L. (2015). Understanding emotion in Chinese culture: Thinking through psychology. New York, NY: Springer SBM.
Sundararajan, L., & Hsieh, S. K. (2017, June). Culture, cognitive, and emotion: What can the robot tell us? Paper presented at the 11th annual Sino-American cultural psychology of religion conference, Beijing.
Sundararajan, L., & Kim, C. (2011). Beyond I-you-me: An empirically supported formulation of the triadic self. The American Sociologist, 42, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-010-9117-7.
Taylor, G. J. (2000). Recent developments in alexithymia theory and research. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 134–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ting, R.SK., Sundararajan, L. (2018). Emotions of Suffering. In: Culture, Cognition, and Emotion in China's Religious Ethnic Minorities. Palgrave Studies in Indigenous Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66059-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66059-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66058-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66059-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)