Understanding Consumers’ Perception of Sustainable Consumption: A ZMET Approach

  • Setayesh Sattari
  • Kaveh Peighambari
  • Arash Kordestani
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)

Abstract

Considering importance of consumers’ understanding of sustainability in shaping their attitude toward CSR and its successful implementation, this research uses the Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique (ZMET) to develop a deeper understanding of how consumers perceive sustainability in general and sustainable consumption in particular. Based on the premise that most human communication is nonverbal, we used pictures as the medium of data collection and asked the 52 participants in this study to collect pictures that visualize their perception and understanding of sustainable consumption.

Results show that overall understanding of sustainability exists among respondents; however, the majority of them have very little knowledge about actual and global meaning of sustainable consumption. Moreover, there existed a discrepancy between different age groups’ understanding of sustainable consumption. Hence, knowing the role of individual’s perception and personal values in the behavioral intention formation process, and given the fact that consumers play a vital role in the success CSR activities, this study suggests that knowing consumers and their perception of sustainability is essential to firms for using CSR as a marketing and branding tool.

Keywords

Sustainability Sustainable Consumption Perception CSR ZMET 

References

  1. Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1140–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carew, A. L., & Mitchell, C. A. (2002). Characterizing undergraduate engineering students’ understanding of sustainability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(4), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chun, H. H., & Giebelhausen, M. (2012). Reversing the green backlash in services: Credible competitors help large companies go green. Journal of Service Management, 23(3), 400–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coulter, R. H., & Zaltman, G. (1994). Using the Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique to understand brand images. Association of Consumer Research, 21, 281–295.Google Scholar
  5. Di Giulio, A., Fischer, D., Schäfer, M., & Blättel-Mink, B. (2014). Conceptualizing sustainable consumption: Toward an integrative framework. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 10(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  6. Eden, C. (1992). On the nature of cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3), 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157.Google Scholar
  8. Grunert, K. G. (2011). Sustainability in the food sector: A consumer behaviour perspective. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2(3), 207–218.Google Scholar
  9. Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2012). Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36, 678–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hustvedt, G., & Dickson, M. A. (2009). Consumer likelihood of purchasing organic cotton apparel: Influence of attitudes and self-identity. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 13(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, T. (2005a). Live better by consuming less? Is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 19–36.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, T. (2005b). Motivating sustainable consumption. Sustainable Development Research Network, 29, 30.Google Scholar
  13. Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Prideaux, B. (2013). ZMET: A psychological approach to understanding unsustainable tourism mobility. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(7), 1036–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kormos, C., & Gifford, R. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehner, M. (2015). Retail store influence on sustainable consumption behavior. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(4), 404–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luchs, M. G., Phipps, M., & Hill, T. (2015). Exploring consumer responsibility for sustainable consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13–14), 1449–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Magnier, L., & Crié, D. (2015). Communicating packaging eco-friendliness: An exploration of consumers’ perceptions of eco-designed packaging. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pinto, D. C., Nique, W. M., Añaña, E. D. S., & Herter, M. M. (2011). Green consumer values: How do personal values influence environmentally responsible water consumption? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schmitz, J., & Schrader, J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: A microeconomic review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schrader, U. (2007). The moral responsibility of consumers as citizens. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1984). Internalized values as motivators of altruism. In E. Staub, D. Bar-Tal, J. Karylowski, & J. Reykowski (Eds.), Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior (pp. 189–211). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  25. Scott, L., & Vigar-Ellis, D. (2014). Consumer understanding, perceptions and behaviours with regard to environmentally friendly packaging in a developing nation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(6), 642–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sugai, P. (2005). Mapping the mind of the mobile consumer across borders: An application of the Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique. International Marketing Review, 22(6), 641–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2006a). The dynamic interaction of personal norms and environment-friendly buying behavior: A panel study1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1758–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2006b). To what degree are environmentally beneficial choices reflective of a general conservation stance? Environment and Behavior, 38(4), 550–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(20), 1580–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Setayesh Sattari
    • 1
  • Kaveh Peighambari
    • 1
  • Arash Kordestani
    • 2
  1. 1.Linnaeus UniversityVäxjöSweden
  2. 2.Luleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations