Skip to main content

Plantations and Economic Development in the Twentieth Century: The End of an Era?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Development in the World Periphery

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Economic History ((PEHS))

Abstract

After a shameful period of forced labour and colonial exploitation, a modern plantation system emerged during the twentieth century, akin to a near-industrial form of production of tropical commodities. Chapter 4 reviews the experience of plantations over the twentieth century, mainly for bananas, oil palm, rubber, sugar cane and tea, with particular attention to the political economy of plantations versus smallholders, infringement of land rights inherent in large land concessions, and the rights and welfare of the large labour force employed. The chapter concludes that large plantations that were the norm at the beginning of that century had largely given way to smallholders by the early twenty-first century and this trend is likely to continue. Land rights of communities on the frontier remain imperfectly recognised while labour rights and conditions on plantations vary widely depending on country and commodity.

Valuable comments from Vicente Pinilla and Anne Booth are appreciated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Another exception is intensive indoor livestock production (poultry and pigs) although this requires little land.

  2. 2.

    The processed product constitutes about 10% of the raw materials for sugar cane and 20% for oil palm .

  3. 3.

    Given the high volume of exports, the frequency of shipping has mitigated the need for contractual delivery of the harvest.

  4. 4.

    At the time, transforming forest “wastelands” into productive plantations was part of the development ethos and only in the later part of the twentieth century was the global value of tropical forests recognised. See Byerlee and Rueda (2015) for a review.

References

  • Allen, D., & Lueck, D. (1998). The Nature of the Farm. The Journal of Law & Economics, 41, 343–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anti-Slavery International. (2004). The Cocoa Industry in West Africa: A History of Exploitation. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from http://www.antislavery.org/includes/documents/cm_docs/2008/c/cocoa_report_2004.pdf

  • Ashagrie, K. (1993). Statistics on Child Labour. Bulletin of Labour Statistics, 3, 663–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. T. (1948). The Rubber Industry: A Study in Competition and Monopoly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, G. L. (1972). Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in Plantation Economies of the Third World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H. P., Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (1995). Power, Distortions, Revolt and Reform in Agricultural Land Relations. In J. Behrman & T. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 3B, pp. 2659–772). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H. P., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1986). Behavioural and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture. Journal of Development Studies, 22(3), 503–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (2007). Colonial Legacies Economic and Social Development in East and Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borah, K. (2013). Entrepreneurship in Small Tea Plantation: A Case of Assam. The Echo, 1, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, U. (2013). Sugar Plantation in India and Indonesia: Industrial Production, 1770–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D. (2014). The Fall and Rise Again of Plantations in Tropical Asia: History Repeated? Land, 3(3), 574–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D., Falcon, W. P., & Naylor, R. L. (2017). The Tropical Oil Crop Revolution: Food, Fuel, Farms and Forests. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D., & Rueda, X. (2015). A Century of Global Discourse on Tropical Commodities on the Forest Frontier: From Public to Private Standards. Forests, 6(4), 1301–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield-Taylor, W. (1956). Firestone Operations in Liberia. Washington, DC: National Planning Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, M. (2003). Land Codes and the State in French Cochin-China c. 1900–1940. Journal of Historical Geography, 29, 356–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, M. C. (1992). Plantation Agriculture and the Formulation of Native Land Rights in British North Borneo c. 1880–1930. Geographical Journal, 158(2), 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Venables, A. J. (2012). Land Deals in Africa: Pioneers and Speculators. Journal of Globalization and Development, 3(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtenay, P. P. (1969). Plantation Agriculture. London: G. Bell and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramb, R. A. (2013). Palmed Off: Incentive Problems with Joint-Venture Schemes for Oil Palm Development on Customary Land. World Development, 43, 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., & Binswanger, H. P. (1995). Rent Seeking and the Development of Large-Scale Agriculture in Kenya, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 43, 493–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drabble, J. H. (1973). Rubber in Malaya, 1876–1922; The Genesis of the Industry. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, A. (1994). Avoiding Holdup: Asset Specificity and Technical Change in the Cuban Sugar Industry, 1899–1929. The Journal of Economic History, 54(03), 628–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (2015). Is Plantation Agriculture Good for the Poor? Evidence from Indonesia’s Palm Oil Expansion? Paper No. 2015-12, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, C. C. (1988). A Definition and Typology of Plantation Agriculture. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 8, 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E., & Foering, I. (1984). The Modern Plantation in the Third World. New York: St Matins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, I. C. (1935). Modern Production Among Backward Peoples. London: G. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Finance Corporation. (2013). Diagnostic Study on Indonesian Oil Palm Smallholders. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization. (1994). Recent Developments in the Plantations Sector. Committee on Work on Plantations, International Labour Organization, Sectoral Activities Programme—Tenth Session Geneva—1994, Report I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. C. (1968). Planters and Speculators: Chinese and European Agricultural Enterprise in Malaya, 1786–1921. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratoska, P. H. (1985). The Peripatetic Peasant and Land Tenure in British Malaya. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 16, 16–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. M. (1988). Palm Oil and Protest: An Economic History of the Ngwa Region, South-Eastern Nigeria, 1800–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. M. (2004). The UP Saga. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. F. (2010). Processes of Inclusion and Adverse Incorporation: Oil Palm and Agrarian Change in Sumatra, Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), 821–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milder, Jeffrey C., & Newsom Deanna (2015). Evaluating the Effects of the SAN/Rainforest Alliance Certification System on Farms, People, and the Environment. SAN/Rainforest Alliance Impacts Report, Sustainable Agriculture Network, Mexico & Rainforest Alliance, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. W. (1985). Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2012). Kenya Smallholder Coffee and Tea: Divergent Trends Following Liberalization. In M. A. Aksoy (Ed.), African Agricultural Reforms: The Role of Consensus and Institutions (pp. 247–270). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. J. (1980). The Development of Capitalism in Colonial Indochina (1870–1940). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, J., & Pritchard, B. (2011). Value Chain Struggles: Institutions and Governance in the Plantation Districts of South India. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pim, A. (1946). Colonial Agricultural Production. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pletcher, J. (1991). Regulation with Growth: The Political Economy of Palm Oil in Malaysia. World Development, 19, 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, A. (1987). The Political Economy of Sugar in Thailand. Pacific Affairs, 60, 248–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajhau, J. P., & Muralt, J. V. (1987). Plantations and Plantation Workers. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, K. (2015). Wages, Mobility, and Labour Market Institutions in Tea Plantations: The Case of West Bengal and Assam. Discussion Paper No. 46, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, M. A. B. (1990). Evolution of Land Grants and Labour Policy of Government: The Growth of the Tea Industry in Assam, 1834–1940. New Delhi: South Asian Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivananthiran, A., & Venkataratnam, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Labour and Social Issues in Plantations in South Asia: Role of Social Dialogue. New Delhi: International Labour Organisation & Indian Industrial Relations Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, D. W., & Roberts, L. J. (2016). Globalized Fruit, Local Entrepreneurs: How One Banana-Exporting Country Achieved Worldwide Reach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, D. J. M. (1996). The RGA History of the Plantation Industry in the Malay Peninsula. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffen, M., & Mortimore, M. (1990). Theory and Practice in Plantation Agriculture. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, F. (2007). Examining the Rainforest Alliance’s Agricultural Certification Robustness. IR/PS CSR Case 07-07 https://gps.ucsd.edu/_files/faculty/gourevitch/gourevitch_cs_ventura.pdf

  • Viswanathan, P. K. (2008). Emerging Smallholder Rubber Farming Systems in India and Thailand: A Comparative Economic Analysis. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 5, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickizer, V. D. (1958). The Plantation System in the Development of Tropical Economies. Journal of Farm Economics, 40, 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S., & Keats, S. (2014). Rural Wages in Asia. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. (2003). The Tragedy of the Cocoa Pod: Rent-Seeking, Land and Ethnic Conflict in Ivory Coast. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 41, 641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zen, Z., Barlow, C., & Gondowarsito, R. (2005). Oil Palm in Indonesian Socio-Economic Improvement: A Review of Options. Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal, 6, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Byerlee, D., Viswanathan, P.K. (2018). Plantations and Economic Development in the Twentieth Century: The End of an Era?. In: Pinilla, V., Willebald, H. (eds) Agricultural Development in the World Periphery. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66019-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66020-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics