Skip to main content

Relational Agency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology

Abstract

This chapter puts the concept of agency into a relational context, avoiding the traditional ‘structure/agency’ debate in sociology. Instead of the concept of ‘social structure’, society is understood as the sum of the manifold social relations composed of temporal-relational contexts. Using two network analyses of different historical contexts, I argue that social change occurs as manifold social relations are reordered and reimagined. In this process, agency has to be reconceptualized as the power of interactants and interdependents to work from within the temporal-relational context to expand its horizon of possibilities and to create new goals of interaction. Because we are interactants and interdependents rather than lone, autonomous agents, our capacity to act is contained within power relations, and is dependent on our co-capacity to improvise on habitual actions and to redeploy resources in response to practical dilemmas. In this we also exploit the polyphony of meanings and values that define our problematic situations in order to reconstruct social relations and organizations. In this view, reflexivity is not the kernel of agency, but instead reflexive agency is a moment within social action more generally, which may have non-conscious origins, and is always set within temporal-relational contexts of interaction and interdependence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M.S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism. Sociological Theory 28 (3): 272–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M.M. 1984 [1929]. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. 2010a. Dialogues with Self and Others: Communication, Miscommunication and the Dialogical Unconscious. Theory and Psychology 20 (3): 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. Fragments of Unconscious Experience: Towards a Dialogical, Relational and Sociological Analysis. Theory and Psychology 20 (3): 322–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Emotions and Social Relations. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C.H. 1927. Social Process. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. 2011. Towards Relational Sociology. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dépelteau, F. 2013. What Is the Direction of the “Relational Turn”. In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, ed. C. Powell and F. Dépelteau, 163–185. New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Relational Sociology, Pragmatism, Transactions and Social Fields. International Review of Sociology 25 (1): 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1983 [1922]. Human Nature and Conduct: The Middle Works of John Dewey, ed. J. A. Boydston, Vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 2011. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 1978. What Is Sociology? London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. 1997. Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. 2012. Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Trans. Jeremy Gaines and Paul Keast. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. 2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1973 [1857]. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Trans. Martin Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977 [1852]. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Karl Marx: Selected Writings, ed. D. McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1970 [1846]. The German Ideology, ed. C. J. Arthur. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 2012 [1945]. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J.F., and C.K. Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98 (6): 1259–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. 1996. Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism. American Journal of Sociology 101 (4): 993–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsekeris, C. 2013. Norbert Elias on Relations: Insights and Perspectives. In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, ed. C. Powell and F. Dépelteau, 87–104. New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burkitt, I. (2018). Relational Agency. In: Dépelteau, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66004-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66005-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics