Abstract
Although Mann never considered himself a relational sociologist, other scholars have seen seeds of relationalism in his works. Nevertheless, there have not been any systematic treatments of Mann’s work from the viewpoint of relational sociology. This is exactly the gap we set out to fill in this chapter. Given our space limitations, we have to restrict our task to Mann’s work on power as it unfolds in his four-volume The Sources of Social Power, since this is probably the most lasting of his achievements. We take our lead from a metalanguage of Dewey and Bentley for conceptualizing “relational sociology” by distinguishing between self-action, inter-action , and trans-action as alternative forms of conceptualizing social action, of which it is the last (i.e. trans-action) that has been considered to be characteristic of “deep” relational thinking. The major argument of the chapter is that if one reads Mann’s approach to power from a synchronic perspective it does not correspond very much to the canons of “deep” relational sociology and his depiction of power relations is clearly self-actionalist and inter-actionalist. But if one assumes a diachronic perspective, Mann appears to be engaged in a more trans-actionalist sociology.
Writing this chapter was supported by the Estonian Research Council with the personal research funding granted to the project PUT1485 A Relational Approach to Governing Wicked Problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Abbott, A. 1988. Transcending General Linear Reality. Sociological Theory 6 (2): 169–186.
Dépelteau, F. 2008. Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency. Sociological Theory 26 (1): 51–73.
———. 2013. What Is the Direction of the Relational Turn? In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, ed. C. Powell and F. Dépelteau, 163–186. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Dépelteau, F., and C. Powell. 2013. Introduction. In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, ed. C. Powell and F. Dépelteau, xv–xx. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Dewey, J., and A. Bentley. 1949. Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press.
Elias, N. 1978. What Is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.
Emirbayer, M. 1997. Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317.
Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.
Hall, J.A., and R. Schroeder, eds. 2006. An Anatomy of Power. The Social Theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heiskala, R. 2016. The Evolution of the Sources of Power, and Some Extensions. In Global Powers: Michael Mann’s Anatomy of the Twentieth Century and Beyond, 11–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Volume 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1993. The Sources of Social Power. Volume 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2004. Fascists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2012. The Sources of Social Power. Volume 3: Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2013. The Sources of Social Power. Volume 4: Globalizations 1945–2011. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Powell, C. 2013. Radical Relationism: A Proposal. In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, ed. C. Powell and F. Dépelteau, 187–207. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Powell, C., and F. Dépelteau. 2013. Introduction. In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, ed. C. Powell and F. Dépelteau, 3–11. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Schroeder, R., ed. 2016a. Global Powers: Michael Mann’s Anatomy of the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2016b. Introduction. In Global Powers: Michael Mann’s Anatomy of the Twentieth Century and Beyond, ed. R. Schroeder, 1–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Selg, P. 2016a. Two Faces of the ‘Relational Turn’. PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (1): 27–31.
———. 2016b. ‘The Fable of the Bs’: Between Substantialism and Deep Relational Thinking About Power. Journal of Political Power 9 (2): 183–205.
Smith, D. 2016. The Return of Big Historical Sociology. In Global Powers: Michael Mann’s Anatomy of the Twentieth Century and Beyond, ed. R. Schroeder, 38–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saarts, T., Selg, P. (2018). Mann and Relational Sociology. In: Dépelteau, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66004-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66005-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)