Wealthy Hubs and Poor Chains: Constellations in the U.S. Urban Migration System

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Geographic Information Science book series (AGIS)

Abstract

Flows of people connect cities into complex systems. Urban systems research focuses primarily on creating economic models that explain movement between cities (whether people, telecommunications, goods or money), and more recently, finding strongly and weakly-connected regions. However, geometrically graphing the dependency between cities within a large network may reveal the roles of small and peripheral city agents in the system to show which cities switch regions from year to year, which medium-sized cities serve as collectors for large cities, and how the network is configured when connected by wealthy or deprived agents.

We propose a network configuration method called ‘best friend’ networks, where a node attaches to one preferential node, so that edges = nodes = n. Our case study is 20 years of migrants, sourced from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, traveling between U.S. cities. In our networks, an edge is created to link a city to its most popular migrant destination city for a given year. The resulting configurations reveal closely connected “constellations” of cities comprised of chains, trees, and hub-spoke structures that show how urban regions are configured. We also show routing behavior within these networks to reveal that high-income migrants tend to flock to hub cities, while low-income migrants form local city chains via nearby movements.

Keywords

Migration Urban hierarchy Economic systems Regional science Spatial interaction Complex systems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Prathamesh Aher for helping prepare data.

References

  1. 1.
    Greenwood MJ (1985) Human migration: theory, models, and empirical studies. J Reg Sci 25:521–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dodd SC (1950) A gravity model fitting physical masses and human groups. Am Sociol Rev 15:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pred A (1980) Urban growth and city systems in the United States, 1840–1860. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andris C, Halverson S, Hardisty F (2011) Predicting migration system dynamics with conditional and posterior probabilities. In: ICSDM 2011—Proceedings 2011 IEEE international conference on spatial data mining and geographical knowledge servicesGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris JR, Todaro MP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60:126–142Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green HL (1955) Hinterland boundaries of New York City and Boston in Southern New England. Econ Geogr 31:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brockmann D, Hufnagel L, Geisel T (2006) The scaling laws of human travel. Nature 439:462–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calabrese F, Dahlem D, Gerber A, Paul D, Chen X, Rowland J, Rath C, Ratti C (2011) The connected states of America: quantifying social radii of influence. In: Privacy, security, risk and trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE third inernational conference on social computing (socialcom). pp 223–230Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheshire JA, Longley PA, Yano K, Nakaya T (2014) Japanese surname regions. Pap Reg Sci 93:539–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Kotkin J (2001) The new geography: how the digital revolution is reshaping the American landscape. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heim CE (2001) Leapfrogging, urban sprawl, and growth management: Phoenix, 1950–2000. Am J Econ Sociol 60:245–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Treyz GI, Rickman DS, Hunt GL, Greenwood MJ (1993) The dynamics of U.S. internal migration. Rev Econ Stat 75:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greenwood MJ, Sweetland D (1972) The determinants of migration between standard metropolitan statistical areas. Demography 9:665–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen Y, Rosenthal SS (2008) Local amenities and life-cycle migration: do people move for jobs or fun? J Urban Econ 64:519–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andris C (2016) Integrating social network data into GISystems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 30:2009–2031Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fawcett JT (1989) Networks, linkages, and migration systems. Int Migr Rev 23:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thiemann C, Theis F, Grady D, Brune R, Brockmann D (2010) The structure of borders in a small world. PLoS One 5:e15422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manduca RA (2014) Domestic migration networks in the United States. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guimera R, Mossa S, Turtschi A, Amaral LAN (2005) The worldwide air transportation network: anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities’ global roles. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 102:7794–7799Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davis KF, D’Odorico P, Laio F, Ridolfi L (2013) Global spatio-temporal patterns in human migration: a complex network perspective. PLoS One 8:e53723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Kelly ME (1998) A geographer’s analysis of hub-and-spoke networks. J Transp Geogr 6:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dunne C, Shneiderman B (2013) Motif simplification: improving network visualization readability with fan, connector, and clique glyphs. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. pp 3247–3256Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jackson MO (2008) Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.JGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clauset A, Newman MEJ, Moore C (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys Rev E 70:66111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. Int J Complex Syst 1695:1–9Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tarver JD, McLeod RD (1973) A test and modification of Zipf’s hypothesis for predicting interstate migration. Demography 10:259–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simini F, González MC, Maritan A, Barabási AL (2012) A universal model for mobility and migration patterns. Nature 484:96–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. pp 361–362Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations