Skip to main content

A Practice-Based Methodology to Enlighten Strategic Alignment Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 299))

  • 2059 Accesses

Abstract

Strategic alignment (SA) has been researched extensively since it first emerged in the early 1990s as a theme within the information systems (IS) strategy domain. The current research trajectory for SA is limited given the predominantly static focus placed on the concept to date, hence we know relatively little about what practitioners do in their day-to-day activity to achieve SA. We therefore propose a practice-based research methodology to help close this knowledge gap. More specifically, we propose joining together, the three pillars of, a Strategy-as-Practice lens, the constructivist grounded theory coding method and case study research design. This practice-based methodology will aid construction of mid-range theory that will have practical relevance in terms of how SA is practiced by practitioners. We recommend applying the methodology to two new research avenues, as a means to build mid-range theory to help us better understand what practitioners actually do, in their day-to-day activity to achieve SA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguinis, H., Vandenberg, R.J.: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: improving research quality before data collection. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1, 569–595 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hatmi, A., Hales, K.: Strategic alignment and IT projects in public sector organisation: challenges and solutions. In: European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Abu Dhabi, 12–13 April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D., Jones, J., Powell, P., Wilson, D.: Using and validating the strategic alignment model. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 13, 223–246 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J.M., Balogun, J., Do, B.: Considering planned change anew: stretching large group interventions strategically, emotionally, and meaningfully. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5, 1–52 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P.: The Logic of Practice. Polity Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A.: Re-grounding grounded theory. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 4, 25–42 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygstad, B., Munkvold, B.E.: Exploring the role of informants in interpretive case study research in IS. J. Inf. Technol. 26, 32–45 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B.: Alignment: resolving ambiguity within bounded choices. In: 9th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 7–10 July 2005, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 656–669 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B., Kay, R., Avison, D.: Strategic alignment: a pracitioner’s perspective. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 18, 653–664 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaye, A.L.M.: Case study research: a multi-faceted research approach for IS. Inf. Syst. J. 6, 227–242 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y.E.: Why haven’t we mastered alignment?: the importance of the informal organisation structure. MIS Q. Exec. 1, 97–112 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y.E., Huff, S.L.: Strategy: an information systems research perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 1, 191–204 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., Mocker, M., Preston, D., Teubner, A.: Information systems strategy: reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Q. 34, 233–259 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R., Mackay, B.: Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Hum. Relat. 60, 217–242 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C.: De Profundis? Deconstructing the concept of strategic alignment. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 9, 67–82 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltman, T., Tallon, P., Sharma, R., Queiroz, M.: Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on. J. Inf. Technol. 30, 91–100 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., Strauss, A.L.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., Verzelloni, L.: Through the practice lens: where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Manag. Learn. 41, 265–283 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumps, B., Martens, D., Debacker, M., Haesen, R., Viaene, S., Dedene, G., Baesens, B., Snoeck, M.: Inferring comprehensible business/IT alignment rules. Inf. Manag. 46, 116–124 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P., Shanks, G., Broadbent, M.: Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Inf. Syst. J. 8, 273–289 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, L., Paré, G.: Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Q. 27, 597–636 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14, 532–550 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, H., McDonagh, J.: Irish CIOs’ influence on technology innovation and IT-business alignment. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 30, 1–11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendt, J., Sachs, W.: Grounded theory method in management research: users’ perspectives. Organ. Res. Methods 11, 430–455 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Pantheon, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartlan, J., Shanks, G.: The alignment of business and information technology strategy in Australia. Aust. J. Inf. Syst. 14, 113–139 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gast, A., Zanini, M.: The social side of strategy. McKinsey Q. 2, 82–93 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J.: What is a case study and what is it good for? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98, 341–354 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, B., Scott, J.E.: Relational alignment in offshore IS outsourcing. MIS Q. Exec. 8, 19–30 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, N., Lowry, P.: Seeking middle-range theories in information systems research. In: 36th International Conference on Information Systems, 13–16 December 2015 Forth Worth, Texas (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, H., Cowley, S.: Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 41, 141–150 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organisations. IBM Syst. J. 32, 4–16 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J., Seidl, D.: The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. J. Manag. Stud. 40, 175–196 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiekkanen, K., Helenius, M., Korhonen, J., Patricio, E.: Aligning alignment with strategic context: a literature review. In: Benghozi, P.-J., Krob, D., Rowe, F. (eds.) DED&M 2013. AISC, vol. 205, pp. 81–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37317-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holohan, J., Mcdonagh, J.: Towards a systematic approach to reviewing the strategic alignment literature. In: 19th UKAIS Conference on Information Systems, 7–9 April 2014, St. Catherine’s College, University of Oxford, England (2014a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holohan, J., McDonagh, J.: Reimagining strategic alignment research: a strategy as practice perspective. In: 28th Annual Conference of the Britsish Academy of Management, 9–11 September 2014, University Business School, University of Ulster, Belfast, Northern Ireland (2014b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holohan, J., McDonagh, J.: How information systems managers align business and information systems strategies in public service organisations: a practice-based taxonomy. In: 17th European Academy of Management Conference, 21–24 June 2017, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland (2017a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P.: Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change. J. Manag. Stud. 40, 23–55 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., Seidl, D.: Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective. Hum. Relat. 60, 5–27 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D.: The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organ. Stud. 29, 1391–1426 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, A.: Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 11, 69–95 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, A.P., Smets, M.: Material artifacts: practices for doing strategy with ‘stuff’. Eur. Manag. J. 31, 41–54 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalika, M., Walsh, I.: Re-conceptualising IS strategic alignment: the translated strategic alignment model (TSAM). In: 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 12–15 August 2010, Lima, Peru (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S.: Book review - strategy as practice: an activity based approach. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 986–990 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpovsky, A., Galliers, R.D.: Aligning in practice: from current cases to a new agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 30, 136–160 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, G.S., Sabherwal, R.: Strategic alignment between business and information technology: a knowledge based view of behaviours, outcome and consequences. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23, 129–162 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S.W.J., Chao, G.T., Grand, J.A., Braun, M.T., Kuljanin, G.: Advancing multilevel research design: capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organ. Res. Methods 16, 581–615 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A., Tsoukas, H.: Introducing “perspectives on process organization studies”. In: Maitlis, T.H.A.S. (ed.) Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing. Oxford University Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J., Seddon, P.: A meta-model of alignment. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 31, 231–258 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merali, Y., Papadopoulos, T., Nadkarni, T.: Information systems strategy: past, present, future? J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 21, 125–153 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., Huberman, M., Saldana, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., Bonner, A., Francis, K.: Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: implications for research design [corrected] [published erratum appears in Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 12(2):119, April 2006]. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 12, 8–13 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M.D., Liu, F.: What does the best IS research look like? An analysis of the AIS basket of top journals. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Hyderabad, India (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D.: Practice Theory, Work & Organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederman, F., Gregor, S., Grover, V., Lyytinen, K., Saunders, C.: ICIS 2008 panel report: IS has outgrown the need for reference disciplines theories, or has it? Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 637–657 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J.: Practice in Research: Phenomenon, Perspective and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J., Markus, M.: The performance impacts of quick response and strategic alignment in speciality retailing. Inf. Syst. Res. 11, 241–259 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré, G.: Investigating information systems with positivist case study research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 233–264 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paroutis, S., Loizos, H., Angwin, D.: Practicing Strategy: Text and Cases. Sage, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppard, J., Galliers, R.D., Thorogood, A.: Information systems strategy as practice: micro strategy and strategizing for IS. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23, 1–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A.M.: What is a processual analysis? Scand. J. Manag. 13, 337–348 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyburn, P.J.: Linking the MIS plan with corporate strategy: an exploratory study. MIS Q. 7, 1–14 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., Chia, R.: Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective. Organ. Stud. 30, 713–734 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A.: Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5, 243–263 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnér, P.: Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: steps towards a dynamic view of strategy. Hum. Relat. 61, 565–588 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, B.H., Benbasat, I.: Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Q. 20, 55–81 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, A., Walsh, I.: The lost dimension of strategic alignment. In: 5th Mediterannean Conference on Information Systems, 12–14 September 2010, Tel Aviv, Israel (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, A., Walsh, I., Kalika, M.: Is SAM still alive? A bibliometric and interpretive mapping of the strategic alignment research field. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 25, 75–103 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D.: Issues of level in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Res. Organ. Behav. 7, 1–37 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, H., Spil, T.A.M.: Dynamic and emergent information systems strategy formulation and implementation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 22, 441–460 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, F.: Mastering the social IT/business alignment challenge. In: 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 9–11 August 2012, Seattle, Washington, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, S., Urquhart, C.: On emergence and forcing in information systems grounded theory studies: the case of Strauss and Corbin. J. Inf. Technol. 28, 237–260 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Seidl, D., Lê, J.K.: Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory. Strateg. Organ. 11, 329–344 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T.S.H., King, W.R.: Assessing the impact of integrating business planning and IS planning. Inf. Manag. 30, 309–321 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., Myers, M.D.: Putting the “theory” back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 20, 357–381 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wessel, M., van Buuren, R., van Woerkum, C.: Changing planning by changing practice: how water managers innovate through action. Int. Publ. Manag. J. 14, 262–283 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.M.: Information systems strategy: Quo vadis? J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 21, 165–171 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R.: Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organ. Stud. 27, 613–634 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R.: Information systems strategy and strategy-as-practice: a joint agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23, 87–91 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: Culture and Value. Blackwell, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Holohan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Holohan, J., McDonagh, J. (2017). A Practice-Based Methodology to Enlighten Strategic Alignment Research. In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65929-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65930-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics