Abstract
I report on the implementation of principles of action learning in undergraduate economics teaching at both the intermediate and advanced level. I define action learning as a form of experiential learning in which participants work together to resolve problems in the learning process. Reviewing students’ evaluation of the experience of action learning, I argue that in some settings they found it to be a good means of encouraging the emergence of a community of practice. Reflecting on students’ concerns about the extent to which it might be possible to engage in action learning effectively without deep subject knowledge, I argue that there is a need to recognize the epistemological structure of disciplinary knowledge as an important constraint on the implementation of action learning principles with undergraduate students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.
Davies, P., & Mangan, J. (2006). Embedding threshold concepts: From theory to pedagogical principles to learning activities. Paper presented at the Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines Symposium, Glasgow.
Forsyth, F. (2006). Problem based learning. Retrieved May 26, 2011, from http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/pbl/
Frank, R. (2006). The economic naturalist writing assignment. Journal of Economic Education, 37(1), 58–67.
Frank, R. (2008). The economic naturalist. London: Virgin Books Ltd.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Harlow: Prentice-Hall.
Mathieson, S. (2011). Disciplinary cultures of teaching and learning as socially situated practice: Rethinking the space between social constructivism and epistemological essentialism from the South African experience. Higher Education, 63(5), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9458-3. Published 25th June, 2011.
McGill, I., & Beatty, L. (2001). Action learning: A practitioner’s guide (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.
Mochrie, R. (2015). Intermediate microeconomics. London: Palgrave.
Moore, R. (2004). Education and society: Issues and explanations in the sociology of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pedlar, M. (2008). Action learning for managers (3rd ed.). Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.
Revans, R. (1971). Developing effective managers: A new approach to management education. London: Praeger.
Revans, R. (1982). The origins and growth of action learning. Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.
Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Oxford: Jossey-Bass Ltd.
Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education: Theories and practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mochrie, R. (2018). Applying Principles of Action Learning in Undergraduate Economics. In: Feraboli, O., Morelli, C. (eds) Post-Crash Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65855-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65855-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65854-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65855-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)