Advertisement

Introduction and Theoretical Focus

  • Simone Claar
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

This chapter presents the analytical and theoretical frameworks used in the book to analyse South African class relations within economic and trade policy, specifically the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA). It highlights the empirical problem of why the South African government rejected the agreement in 2007 and concluded it in 2016. The main argument is that the South African rejection was based on a short-lived class fraction compromise that eroded over time. The analysis is based on Nikos Poulantzas’ theory of social relations and is strengthened through the references to transnationalisation, North-South relations, a postcolonial perspective and race. Based on this, the chapter introduces the historical materialist policy analysis (HMPA) that provides the foundation of the book structure in the form of a context, actor and process analysis.

References

  1. Ahearn, Raymond. 2011. Europe’s Preferential Trade Agreements: Status, Content, and Implications. United States Congress: Congressional Research Service, R 41143.Google Scholar
  2. Alavi, Hamza. 1972. The State in Post-Colonial Societies: Pakistan and Bangladesh. New Left Review 74: 59–81.Google Scholar
  3. Althusser, Louis. 1977. Ideologie und Ideologische Staatsapparate. Hamburg: VSA Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Alves, Philip, and Lawrence Edwards. 2009. South Africa. In The Political Economy of Trade Reform in Emerging Markets: Crisis or Opportunity? ed. Peter Draper, Philip Alves, and Razeen Sally, 200–238. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Asche, Helmut, and Ulf Engel, eds. 2008. Negotiating Regions: Economic Partnership Agreements between the European Union and the African Regional Economic Communities. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  6. Ayres, Jeffrey M. 2004. Political Economy, Civil Society, and the Deep Integration Debate in Canada. The American Review of Canadian Studies 34: 621–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balassa, Béla. 1961. Towards a Theory of Economic Integration. Kyklos 14 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrow, Clyde W. 2016. Toward a Critical Theory of States—The Poulantzas-Miliband Debate after Globalization. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bayart, Jean-François, Stephen Ellis, and Béatrice Hibou. 1999. The Criminalization of the State in Africa. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, Uwe, ed. 2013. The BRICS and Emerging Economies in Comparative Perspective: Political Economy, Liberalization and Institutional Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Behrens, Maria, and Holger Janusch. 2012. Der transnationale Wettbewerbsstaat. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 28 (2): 28–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell, Trevor. 1993. Should South Africa Further Liberalise Its Trade? In State and Market: In Post-Apartheid South Africa, ed. Merlie Lipton and Charles Simkins, 81–128. Johannesburg: Witswaterand University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Beresford, Alexander. 2016. South Africa’s Political Crisis. Unfinished Liberation and Fractured Class Struggles. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  14. Bertow, Kerstin. 2009. Trade Policy Between European Union and African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) Countries: Agriculture in the Negotiations on Economic Partnership Agreements in Southern Africa. PhD diss., Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen. http://geb.unigiessen.de/geb/volltexte/2009/7104/pdf/BertowKerstin_2009_07_15.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2014.
  15. Bieling, Hans-Jürgen. 2011. “Integraler Staat” und Globalisierung. In Gramsci global. Neogramscianische Perspektiven in der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie, ed. Benjamin Opratko and Oliver Prausmüller, 87–105. Hamburg: Argument-Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Bösl, Anton, André du Pisani, Gerhard Erasmus, Trudi Hartzenberg, and Ron Sandey. 2011. Monitoring Regional Integration in Southern Africa. Yearbook 2010. Stellenbosch: Tralac.Google Scholar
  17. Brand, Ulrich. 2013. State, Context and Correspondence. Contours of a Historical-Materialist Policy Analysis. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 42 (4): 425–442.Google Scholar
  18. Brand, Ulrich, Christoph Görg, and Markus Wissen. 2011. Second-Order Condensations of Societal Power Relations. Environmental Politics and the Internationalization of the State from a Neo-Poulantzian Perspective. Antipode 43 (1): 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruff, Ian. 2012. The Relevance of Nicos Poulantzas for Contemporary Debates on ‘The International’. International Politics 49 (2): 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buckel, Sonja. 2013. ‘Welcome to Europe’—die Grenzen des europäischen Migrationsrechts. Juridische Auseinandersetzungen um das Staatsprojekt Europa. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Büntrup, Michael. 2008. Agricultural in the Economic Partnership Agreements. In Negotiating Regions: The Economic Partnerships Agreements Between the European Union and the African Regional Economic Communities, ed. Helmut Asche and Ulf Engel, 131–164. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  22. Burawoy, Michael. 2014. The Colour of Class Revisited: Four Decades of Postcolonialism in Zambia. Journal of Southern African Studies 40 (5): 961–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Butler, Anthony. 2010. The African National Congress Under Jacob Zuma. In New South African Review 1: 2010: Development or Decline? ed. John Daniel, Prishani Naidoo, Devan Pillay, and Roger Southall, 164–183. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Carim, Xavier. 2017. South Africa, the EU, and the SADC Group Economic Partnership Agreement: Through the Negotiating Lens The ACP Group and the EU Development Partnership. In Beyond the North-South Debate, ed. Annita Montoute and Kudrat Virk, 161–180. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Chang, Ha-Joon. 2005. Policy Space in Historical Perspective—With Special Reference to Trade and Industrial Policies. Talk presented at Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, October 27. http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/about_us/leontief/Chang_remarks.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2011.
  26. Chowdhry, Geeta, and Sheila Nair. 2004. Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender, and Class in International Relations. In Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations. Reading Race, Gender and Class, ed. Geeta Chowdhry and Sheila Nair, 1–32. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Claar, Simone, and Andreas Nölke. 2012a. Tiefe Integration als widersprüchlicher Prozess in den Nord-Süd-Beziehungen. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 28 (2): 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 2012b. Tiefe Integration: Konzeptuelle Grundlagen. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 28 (2): 8–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2013. Deep Integration in North–South Relations: Compatibility Issues between the EU and South Africa. Review of African Political Economy 40 (136): 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Claar, Simone, and Anna Krämer. 2010. Reconsidering the Transnationalisation of the States from a Postcolonial Perspective. Paper presented at the Pan-European Conference on International Relations, Stockholm, Sweden, September 9–11.Google Scholar
  31. Clarke, Simon. 1978. Capital, Fractions of Capital and the State. ‘Neo-Marxist’ Analysis of the South African State. Capital and Class 5 (1): 32–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cox, Robert W. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cronin, David. 2007. TRADE: EPAs Signed “Under Duress” Says South Africa. Inter Press Service News Agency, December 21. http://www.ipsnews.net/2007/12/trade-epas-signed-lsquolsquounder-duressrsquorsquo-says-south-africa/. Accessed 12 Jan 2009.
  34. Davies, Robert, David Kaplan, Mike Morris, and Dan O’Meara. 1976. Class Struggle and the Periodization of the State in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy 7 (1): 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Declaration of Civil Society Organisations. 2008. Call to Action Against Europe’s Aggressive Economic Agenda in Africa. Meeting of the Africa Trade Network, Cape Town, South Africa, February 22. https://sslsites.de/stopepa.de/img/ATN_Declaration_EPAs_Capetown_Feb_22_2008.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.
  36. Demirović, Alex. 2007. Nicos Poulantzas. Zur Aktualität und Probleme materialistischer Staatstheorie. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  37. British Department for International Development. 2007. Ten Myths About Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs). December 11. Accessed 12 Jan 2009. http://www.dfid.gov.uk/aboutdfid/organisation/economic-partnership-agreements-myths.asp. Available via web.archive.org
  38. Disenyana, Tsidiso. 2008. SACU and Deeper Integration. South African Institute of International Affairs, December 9. http://www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/sacu-and-deeper-integration. Accessed 19 Dec 2008.
  39. Draper, Peter. 2007. EU-Africa Trade Relations: The Political Economy of Economic Partnership Agreements. Jan Tumlir Policy Essays No. 2/2007, EICIPE, Brussels.Google Scholar
  40. Draper, Peter, and Nkululeko Khumalo, eds. 2008. One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Deal-Breaker Issues in the Failed US-SACU Free Trade Negotiations. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  41. Draper, Peter, and Philip Alves. 2009. Trade Reform in Southern Africa. Vision 2014? Auckland Park: Fanele.Google Scholar
  42. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). 2016. Briefing to the Parliamentary Committee on the Evolution of EU—ACP Relations and the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) Negotiations. Department of Trade and Industry, June 20. https://www.thedti.gov.za/parliament/2016/Evolution_EPA_negotiations.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2017.
  43. Durrheim, Kevin, Xoliswa Mtose, and Lyndsay Brown. 2011. Race Trouble. Race, Identity and Inequality in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  44. Edwards, Lawrence, and Robert Z. Lawrence. 2012. A Strategic View of South African Trade Policy in Relation to the Future Global Trading Environment. South African Journal of International Affairs 19 (3): 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Elgström, Ole. 2009. From Cotonou to EPA Light: A Troubled Negotiation Process. In Beyond Market Access for Economic Development. EU-Africa Relations in Transition, ed. Gerrit Faber and Jan Orbie, 21–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Elsenhans, Hartmut. 1996. State, Class and Development. New Delhi: Radiant Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. European Commission 1996. Green Paper on the Relations Between the European Union and the ACP Countries in the eve of the 21st century. Challenges and Options for a New Partnership. COM(96)570 final.Google Scholar
  48. ——— 2006. A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy. Executive Summary. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/october/tradoc_130380.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2010.
  49. ———. 2017a. The State of EU Trade. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/june/tradoc_149622.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
  50. ———. 2017b. Overview of the Economic Partnership Agreement. Updated in January 2017. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/september/tradoc_144912.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
  51. EU–SADC EPA (European Commission). 2016. Economic Partnership Agreement. Official Journal of the European Union. July 19, 2016. LL 250: 3–2120. https://www.tralac.org/images/Resources/SADC/SADC-EU%20EPA%20consolidated%20text%20and%20annexes%20September%202016.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  52. European Parliament. 2009. The Cariforum-EU Economic Partnership Agreement (EPAs): The Development Component. http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4205.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2014.
  53. Evans, David, Peter Holmes, Leonardo Iacovone, and Sherman Robinson. 2004. A Framework for Evaluating Regional Trade Agreements: Deep Integration and New Regionalism. December, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  54. Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Faber, Gerrit, and Jan Orbie, eds. 2009a. Beyond Market Access for Economic Development. EU-Africa Relations in Transition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 2009b. EPAs Between the EU and Africa: Beyond Free Trade? In Beyond Market Access for Economic Development. EU-Africa Relations in Transition, ed. Gerrit Faber and Jan Orbie, 3–20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Fanon, Franz. 2004. The Wretched of the Earth. First Published in French Language in 1961. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  58. Fautrel, Vincent. 2008. Economic Partnership Agreements, Agricultural and Common Agricultural Policy Reform: Key Challenges for the ACP Countries. In Negotiating Regions: The Economic Partnerships Agreements between the European Union and the African Regional Economic Communities, ed. Helmut Asche and Ulf Engel, 165–172. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  59. Fontagné, Lionel, David Laborde, and Cristina Mitaritonna. 2011. “An Impact Study of the EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements in the Six ACP Regions.” Journal of African Economies 20 (2): 179-216.Google Scholar
  60. Forschungsgruppe ›Staatsprojekt Europa‹. 2014. Kämpfe um Migrationspolitik. Theorie, Methode und Analysen kritischer Europaforschung. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Fundira, Taku. 2017. Implementing the SADC EPA—Challenges and Impact. Tralac Discussion, March 1. https://www.tralac.org/discussions/article/11348-implementing-the-sadc-epa-challenges-and-impact.html. Accessed 11 Mar 2017.
  62. Gallagher, Kevin. 2011. Trading Away Stability and Growth: United States Trade Agreements in Latin America. PERI Working Paper 266. Amherst: Political Economy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  63. Gallas, Alexander. 2016. The Thatcherite Offensive. A Neo-Poulantzasian Analysis. Leiden: Brill. Leiden.Google Scholar
  64. Gallas, Alexander, Lars Bretthauer, John Kannankulam, and Ingo Stützle. 2011. Introduction. In Reading Poulantzas, ed. Alexander Gallas, Lars Bretthauer, John Kannankulam, and Ingo Stützle, 9–26. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  65. Gasiorek, Michael, and Peter Holmes. 2008. Globalisation and Deep Integration. Paper presented at the CARIS Conference, Sussex, UK, May 22–23.Google Scholar
  66. Ghoneim, Ahmed Farouk. 2008. Investigating the Needs and Potential Effects of some Aspects of Deep Integration in the EU-Egypt Association Agreement and Neighbourhood Policy. Paper presented at the CARIS Conference, Sussex, May 22–23. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/caris/documents/4.doc. Accessed 17 Nov 2008.
  67. Ghoneim, Ahmed F., Javier J. Gonzalez, Maximiliano M. Parra, and Nicolas Péridy. 2011. Shallow vs. Deep Integration Between Mediterranean Countries and the EU and within the Mediterranean Region. Case Network Reports, 96/2011, Case: Warsaw.Google Scholar
  68. Gill, Stephen. 2003. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  69. Grant-Makokera, Catherina, and Lambert Botha. 2011. South Africa—European Union Trade: Age-old Chestnuts and Dealmakers. South African Institute of International Affairs, October 4. http://www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/south-africa-european-union-trade-age-old-chestnuts-and-dealmakers. Accessed 14 Dec 2014.
  70. Grobbelaar, Neumar, and Hany Besada, eds. 2008. Unlocking Africa’s Potential: The Role of Corporate South Africa in Strengthening Africa’s Private Sector. Johannesburg: SAIIA.Google Scholar
  71. Habib, Adam. 2013. South Africa’s Suspended Revolution. Hopes and Prospects. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Hall, Stuart. 1980. Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance. In Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism, published by UNESCO, 306–345. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 2000 [1978]. Introduction to the Verso Classics edition. Nicos Poulantzas: State, Power, Socialism, 1980. In State, Power Socialism, edited by Nicos Poulantzas, vii–xviii. New Edition with an Introduction by Stuart Hall. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  74. Harvey, David. 2005. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Hirsch, Alan. 2005a. Season of Hope. Economic Reforms under Mandela and Mbeki. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  76. Hirsch, Joachim. 2005b. Materialistische Staatstheorie: Transformationsprozess des kapitalistischen Staatsystems. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.Google Scholar
  77. Hirsch, Joachim, and Jens Wissel. 2011. The Transformation of Contemporary Capitalism and the Concept of a Transnational Capitalist Class: A Critical Review in Neo-Poulantzian Perspective. Studies in Political Economy 88 (1): 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hirsch, Joachim, John Kannankulam, and Jens Wissel. 2008. Die Staatstheorie des “westlichen Marxismus”. Gramsci, Althusser, Poulantzas und die so genannte Staatsableitung. In Der Staat der Bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Zum Staatsverständnis von Karl Marx, ed. Joachim Hirsch, John Kannankulam, and Jens Wissel, 92–115. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Horn, Henrik, Petros C. Mavroidis, and André Sapir. 2009. Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements. Bruegel Blueprint Series 7, Bruegel.Google Scholar
  80. Jakobeit, Cord, Trudi Hartzenberg, and Nick Charalambides. 2005. Overlapping Membership in COMESA, EAC, SACU and SADC. Trade Policy Options for the Region and for EPA Negotiations. Eschborn, GTZ.Google Scholar
  81. Jenss, Alke. 2016. Grauzonen staatlicher Gewalt—Staatlich produzierte Unsicherheit in Kolumbien und Mexiko. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  82. Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
  83. ———. 1985. Nicos Poulantzas: Marxist Theory and Political Strategy. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Johnson, Chalmers. 1999. The Developmental State: Odyssey of a Concept. In The Developmental State, ed. Meredith Woo-Cummings, 32–60. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Julian, Melissa. 2010. EPA Update. Trade Negotiations Insight 9(6).Google Scholar
  86. Kabwe, Na Zitto Z. 2007. The Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA): Challenges for Tanzania. Accessed 19 Jan 2009. http://www.chadema.net/makala/kabwe/zitto_4.html. Available via web.archive.org
  87. Kahler, Miles. 2013. Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo. International Affairs 89: 711–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kannankulam, John, and Fabian Georgi. 2012. Die Europäische Integration als materielle Verdichtung von Kräfteverhältnissen. Hegemonieprojekte im Kampf um das ‚Staatsprojekt Europa’. Arbeitspapier 30, Forschungsgruppe Europäische Integration am Institut für Politikwissenschaft des Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften und Philosophie der Philipps-Universität Marburg.Google Scholar
  89. ———. 2014. Varieties of Capitalism or Varieties of Relationship of Forces? Outlines of a Historical Materialist Policy Analysis. Capital & Class 38 (1): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Kappel, Robert. 2011. The Challenge to Europe: Regional Powers and the Shifting of the Global Order. Intereconomics 46 (5): 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Kasirye, Samuel. 2014. 10 Years of the Stop EPA Movement: The Future of Trade Activism. Keynote Address at Free Trade at the Crossroads: Examining the Past Lessons for the Future, Brussels. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, November 18–20. https://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/Ausland/Afrika/Kasirye_-_10_years_of_the_Stop_EPA_Movement.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
  92. KOSA. 2005. Über die Kampagne. Last updated 2009. http://www.stopepa.de/kampagne.html. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
  93. Langan, Mark. 2009. ACP–EU Normative Concessions from Stabex to Private Sector Development: Why the European Union’s Moralised Pursuit of a ‘Deep’ Trade Agenda is Nothing ‘New’ in ACP–EU Relations. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10 (3): 416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lawrence, Robert. 1996. Regionalisms, Multilateralism and Deeper Integration. Washington: The Bookings Institution.Google Scholar
  95. Le Roux, Mathabo. 2008. South Africa: Crunch Week for World’s Oldest Customs Union. Business Day, March 3. http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/article.aspx?ID=BD4A718582. Accessed 12 Dec 2009.
  96. Leubolt, Berhard. 2015. Transformation von Ungleichheitsregimes Gleichheitsorientierte Politik in Brasilien und Südafrika. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  97. Lloyd, Peter. 2008. Deep Integration in Regional Trading Agreements. In Regional Trade Agreements in Asia, ed. Tran van Hoa and Charles Harvie, 16–43. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  98. Lorenz, Ulrike. 2011. Negotiating Regional Trade Agreements—Transforming Regional Order. The Economic Partnership Agreements between the European Union and the SADC EPA Group. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
  99. Lorenz-Carl, Ulrike. 2013. When the ‘Not so Weak’ Bargain with the ‘Not so Strong’: Whose Agency Matters in the Economic Partnership Agreements. In Mapping Agency: Comparing Regionalisms in Africa, ed. Ulrike Lorenz-Carl and Martin Rempe, 61–76. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  100. Marais, Hein. 2011. South Africa Pushed to the Limit. The Political Economy of Change. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  101. McCarthy, Colin, Paul Kruger, and Johan Fourie. 2007. Benchmarking EPA Negotiations Between EU and SADC. Stellenbosch: Tralac.Google Scholar
  102. Meyn, Mareike. 2003. Das Freihandelsabkommen zwischen Südafrika und der EU und seine Implikationen für die Länder der Southern African Customs Union (SACU). Berichte aus dem Weltwirtschaftlichen Colloquium Nr. 82. Bremen: Institut für Weltwirtschaft und Internationales Management.Google Scholar
  103. ———. 2004. The EU—South Africa FTA and its Effect on EPA Negotiations: An Examination of Some Options, Opportunities and Challenges Facing the BLNS Countries. Paper prepared for the European Community Studies Association in Southern Africa Conference ‘The Relationship between Africa and the European Union’, University of Western Cape, South Africa, January 22–23. http://www.iwim.uni-bremen.de/dasiwim/ECSA%20SA%20Paper.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2009.
  104. ———. 2006. The Impact of EU Free Trade Agreements on Economic Development and Regional Integration in Southern Africa: The Example of EU-SACU Trade Relations. Hamburg: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
  105. Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Morrissey, Oliver, and Evious Zgovu. 2011. The Impact of EPAs on ACP Imports and Welfare. In Assessing Prospective Trade Policy. Methods Applied to EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements, ed. Oliver Morrissey, 60–82. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Müller, Franziska. 2015. Im Namen liberaler Normen? Gouvernementalität in den EU-AKP-Beziehungen. Nomos: Baden-Baden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Müller, Franziska, Simone Claar, and Aram Ziai. 2013. Zur Architektur des Welthandels. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 1–3/2014.Google Scholar
  109. Ndletyana, Mcebisi. 2014. Middle Class in South Africa: Significance, Role and Impact 6th BRICS Academic Forum. Mistra, March 18–19. http://www.mistra.org.za/Library/ConferencePaper/Documents/Middle%20Class%20in%20South%20Africa-Significance,%20role%20and%20impact.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  110. Nduru, Moyiga. 2007. Trade-Southern Africa: EU Agreement Has ‘Not Been Beneficial’. Inter Press Service News Agency, April 26. http://ipsnews.net/print.asp?idnews=37501. Accessed 12 Jan 2009.
  111. Nölke, Andreas, Christian May und Simone Claar. 2014. Die großen Schwellenländer. Ursachen und Folgen ihres Aufstiegs in der Weltwirtschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Nölke, Andreas, Tobias ten Brink, Simone Claar, and Christian May. 2015. Domestic Structures, Foreign Economic Policies and Global Economic Order: Implications from the Rise of Large Emerging Economies. European Journal of International Relations 21 (3): 538–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Olivier, Gerrit. 2006. South Africa and the European Union, Self-Interest, Ideology and Altruism. Pretoria: Protea Book House.Google Scholar
  114. Patel, Mayur. 2007. Economic Partnership Agreements Between the EU and African Countries: Potential Development Implications for Ghana. Realizing Rights, June. http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/sites/geg/files/documents/Trade%20Document_Ghana.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2008.
  115. Phiri, Dorica Suvye. 2008. Economic Partnership Agreements and Intellectual Property Rights Protection: Challenges for the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Region. South African Institute of International Affairs, November 10. http://www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/economic-partnership-agreements-and-intellectual-property-rights-protection-challenges-for-the-southern-african-development-community-sadc-region. Accessed 19 Dec 2008.
  116. Pillay, Devan. 2011. The Tripartite Alliance and its Discontents: Contesting the ‘National Democratic Revolution’ in the Zuma Era. In New South African Review 2: New Path? Old Compromises? ed. John Daniel, Prishani Naidoo, Devan Pillay, and Roger Southall, 31–49. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  117. Pisani, André du, Gerhard Erasmus, and Trudi Hartenberg. 2013. Monitoring Regional Integration in Southern Africa. Yearbook 2012. Stellenbosch: Tralac/Konrad Adenauer Foundation.Google Scholar
  118. Pitcher, Anne. 2012a. Party Politics and Economic Reform in Africa’s Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. ———. 2012b. Was Privatisation Necessary and Did it Work? The Case of South Africa. Review of African Political Economy 39 (132): 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Plaut, Martin, and Paul Holden, eds. 2012. Who Rules South Africa? Pulling the Strings in the Battle for Power. Johannesburg and Cape Town: Jonathan and Ball Publishers.Google Scholar
  121. Pollard, Jane, Cheryl McEwan, and Alex Hughes. 2011. Introduction: Postcolonial Economies. In Postcolonial Economies, ed. Jane Pollard, Cheryl McEwan, and Alex Hughes, 1–22. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  122. Poulantzas, Nicos. 1973. On Social Classes. New Left Review 78: 27–55.Google Scholar
  123. ———. 1974. Internationalisation of Capitalist Relations and Nation-State. Economy and Society 3 (2): 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. ———. 1975a [1973]. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  125. ———. 1975b [1973]. Klassen im Kapitalismus- heute. Studien zur Klassenanalyse 5. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.Google Scholar
  126. ———. 1976a. The Capitalist State: A Reply to Miliband and Laclau. New Left Review 95: 63–83.Google Scholar
  127. ———. 1976b. The Crisis of the Dictatorships: Portugal, Greece, Spain. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  128. ———. 1977. The New Petty Bourgeoisie. In Class and Class Structure, ed. Alan Hunt, 113–125. London: Lawerence & Wishardt.Google Scholar
  129. ———. 2000 [1978]. State, Power Socialism. New Edition with an Introduction by Stuart Hall. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  130. Randeria, Shalini. 2007. The State of Globalisation. Legal Plurality, Overlapping Sovereignties and Ambiguous Alliances between Civil Society and the Cunning State in India. Theory, Culture & Society 24 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Risse, Thomas, ed. 2011. Governance Without a State? Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Robinson, William. 2002. Capitalist Globalization and the Transnationalisation of the State. In Historical Materialism and Globalization, ed. Mark Rupert and Hazel Smith, 210–229. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  133. de Roquefeuil, Quentin. 2014. EPA Update. GREAT Insights 3 (7). http://ecdpm.org/great-insights/epa-update-july-august-2014/. Accessed 6 Nov 2014.
  134. Rotberg, Robert I., ed. 2003. When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  135. Roux, Wallie. 2007. Response to the Letter ‘This is Not a Poker Game’ by Messrs Peter Mandelson and Louis Michel in Guardian, October 31, 2007. bilaterals.org, November 6. http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?page=print&id_article=10274&lang=en. Accessed 25 Jan 2009.
  136. Schaffar, Wolfram, and Aram Ziai. 2011. Demokratie, Demokratisierung und Konstiutionalismus in Peripheriestaaten. In Politik und Peripherie. Eine politikwissenschaftliche Einführung, ed. Ilker Ataç, Albert Kraler, and Aram Ziai, 93–112. Vienna: Mandelbaum Verlag.Google Scholar
  137. Schneider, Ben Ross. 1999. The desarollista State in Brazil and Mexico. In The Developmental State, ed. Meredith Woo-Cummings, 276–305. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Schwank, Oliver. 2007. Handel und Entwicklung: Entwicklungsprozesse in historischer Perspektive in Abhängigkeit von der Eingliederung in das internationale Handelsregime. In Kapitalistische Entwicklung in Nord und Süd. Handel, Geld, Arbeit, Staat, ed. Joachim Becker, Karen Imhof, Johannes Jäger, and Cornelia Staritz, 91–105. Vienna: Mandelbaum Verlag.Google Scholar
  139. Seekings, Jeremy, and Nicoli Nattrass. 2005. Class, Race, and Inequality in South Africa. Scottsville: UKZN Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. ———. 2015. Policy, Politics and Poverty in South Africa. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Shadlen, Kenneth. 2005. Exchanging Development for Market Access? Deep Integration and Industrial Policy Under Multilateral and Regional-Bilateral Trade Agreements. Review of International Political Economy 12 (5): 750–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. 2014. Constructing European Union Trade Policy: A Global Idea of Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Sklair, Leslie. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  144. Southall, Roger. 2014. The Black Middle Class and Democracy in South Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies 52 (4): 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Stephen, Matthew. 2012. Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa. Global Society 26 (3): 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. ten Brink, Tobias. 2013. Chinas Kapitalismus. Entstehung, Verlauf, Paradoxien. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  147. Terreblanche, Sampie. 2002. A History of Inequality in South Africa 1652–2002. Scottsville: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
  148. The Times of India. 2016. BRICS Trade with World Grows 5.8%, India Leading: Maersk, October 15. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/BRICS-trade-with-world-grows-5-8-India-leading-Maersk/articleshow/54836146.cms. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
  149. Tralac. 2012. The Tripartite Free Trade Area: Towards a New African Integration Paradigm? Stellenbosch: Trade Law Centre for Southern Africa.Google Scholar
  150. ———. 2017. SADC Legal Texts and Policy Documents. https://www.tralac.org/resources/by-region/sadc.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2017.
  151. United States Trade Representative. n.d. Free Trade Agreements. https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements. Accessed 11 Mar 2017.
  152. van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. 2004. Theorizing the Transnational: A Historical Materialist Approach. Journal of International Relations and Development 7 (2): 142–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. van der Pijl, Kees. 1997. Transnational Class Formation and State Forms. In Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, ed. Stephen Gill and James H. Mittelmann, 115–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  154. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2002. The Itinerary of World-Systems Analysis; or, How to Resist Becoming a Theory. In New Direction in Contemporary Sociological Theory, ed. Joseph Berger and Zeldtich Morris Jr., 358–376. Maryland: Lanham Rownan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  155. Weber, Max. 1980 [1921]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. 5th ed. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr Verlag.Google Scholar
  156. Weidlich, Brigitte. 2008. TRADE: EPA Damages Regional Cooperation in Southern Africa. Inter Press Service News Agency, February 15. http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=41212. Accessed 19 Jan 2009.
  157. Wissel, Jens. 2007. Die Transnationalisierung von Herrschaftsverhältnissen. Zur Aktualität von Nicos Poulantzas’ Staatstheorie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. ———. 2011. Staatsprojekt Europa. Zur Rekonfiguration politischer Herrschaft. Eurostudia 7 (1–2): 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Wolpe, Harold. 1972. Capitalism and Cheap Labour—Power in South Africa: From Segregation to Apartheid. Economy and Society 1 (4): 425–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. ———. 1988. Race, Class and the Apartheid State. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  161. World Trade Organisation. 1994. General Agreement of Trade and Tariffs Article I, General Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment. World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt_ai_e/art1_e.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2014.
  162. ———. 2014. International Trade Statistics 2014. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2014_e/its14_toc_e.htm. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
  163. ———. 2016. World Trade Statistical Review 2016. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2016_e/wts2016_e.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
  164. ———. 2017. What Is the WTO. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/whatis_e.htm. Accessed 11 Mar 2017.
  165. Young, Alasdair R., and John Peterson. 2006. The EU and the New Trade Politics. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6): 863–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Claar
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations