Advertisement

Two Emerging Topics for Humor Research and Practice: Diversity and Virtuality

  • Tabea ScheelEmail author
  • Christine Gockel
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Psychology book series (BRIEFSPSYCHOL)

Abstract

In this concluding chapter, we discuss two important new avenues for humor research. First, globalization, as well as demographic changes in organizations, increase diversity with regard to age, gender, nationality, and so on. Thus, there will also be more diversity in communication, the expression of emotions, and the use of humor within work units. As one consequence, humorous comments may be accompanied by misunderstandings. In worse cases, the workflow might suffer. Second, due to increasing workplace flexibility in organizations, more communication will take place virtually, for instance, via email, chat, or skype. All of these media transmit less information than traditional face-to-face communication. Therefore, it becomes more difficult for receivers to decipher those social and emotional cues that signal that a comment is not meant seriously. More misunderstandings in humorous communications should result. We discuss to what extent these misunderstandings might be mitigated by the use of emoticons and other virtual signals of emotions. Taken together, leaders and employees alike are advised to establish some common ground for their humorous communications in their work units.

Keywords

Diversity Age Gender Culture Virtuality Computer-mediated communication (CMC) Face-to-face (FTF) communication Virtual teams Emoticons Media richness theory 

References

  1. Aillaud, M., & Piolat, A. (2012). Influence of gender on judgment of dark and nondark humor. Individual Differences Research, 10(4), 211–222.Google Scholar
  2. Andres, H. P. (2012). Technology-mediated collaboration, shared mental model and task performance. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 24(1), 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axtell, C. M., Fleck, S. J., & Turner, N. (2004). Virtual teams: Collaborating across distance. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 19, 205–248.Google Scholar
  4. Bitkom. (2016). Anteil der Smartphone-Nutzer in Deutschland in den Jahren 2012 bis 2016. In Statista - Das Statistik-Portal. Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/585883/umfrage/anteil-der-smartphone-nutzer-in-deutschland/.
  5. Bowling, N. A., Beehr, T. A., Johnson, A. L., Semmer, N. K., Hendricks, E. A., & Webster, H. A. (2004). Explaining potential antecedents of workplace social support: Reciprocity or attractiveness? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(4), 339–350. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.9.4.339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2004). Development a typology of humor in audivisual media. Media Psychology, 6, 147–167. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castellá, V. O., Abad, A. Z., Alonso, F. P., & Silla, J. P. (2000). The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited behavior through three different communication media. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, G.-H., & Martin, R. A. (2007). A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. Humor, 20(3), 215–234. doi: 10.1515/HUMOR.2007.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15(4), 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coner, W. (2016). Geschlechterdifferenzen im Bereich Humor - eine Metaanalyse [Gender differences in the domain of humor—A metaanalysis] (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, J. A., Read, R. L., & Van Auken, P. M. (1990). Male-female differences in communicating job-related humor: An exploratory study. Humor, 3(3), 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curry, O. S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Sharing a joke: The effects of a similar sense of humor on affiliation and altruism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 125–129. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyck, K. T. H., & Holtzman, S. (2013). Understanding humor styles and well-being: The importance of social relationships and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenberg, A. R. (1986). Teasing: Verbal play in two mexicano homes. In B. B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 183–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Greengross, G., & Miller, G. F. (2008). Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects of status, personality, and sex on the short-term and long-term attractiveness of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruber, J., Mauss, I. B., & Tamir, M. (2011). A dark side of happiness? How, when, and why happiness is not always good. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 222–233. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hess, U., Adams, R. B., Simard, A., Stevenson, M. T., & Kleck, R. E. (2012). Smiling and sad wrinkles: Age-related changes in the face and the perception of emotions and intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1377–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.018.
  21. Hess, U., & Bourgeois, P. (2010). You smile–I smile: Emotion expression in social interaction. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 514–520. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.11.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. House, R. J., et al. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M., et al. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. Advances in Global Leadership, 1, 171–233.Google Scholar
  26. Kalliny, M., Cruthirds, K. W., & Minor, M. S. (2006). Differences between American, Egyptian and Lebanese humor styles: Implications for international management. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(1), 121–134. doi: 10.1177/1470595806062354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kauffeld, S., Handke, M. S. L., & Straube, M. S. J. (2016). Verteilt und doch verbunden: Virtuelle Teamarbeit. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 47(1), 43–51.Google Scholar
  28. Kazarian, S. S., & Martin, R. A. (2004). Humour styles, personality, and well-being among Lebanese university students. European Journal of Personality, 18(3), 209–219. doi: 10.1002/per.505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kazarian, S. S., & Martin, R. A. (2006). Humor styles, culture-related personality, well-being, and family adjustment among Armenians in Lebanon. Humor—International Journal of Humor Research, 19(4), 405–423. doi: 10.1515/HUMOR.2006.020.
  30. Kuipers, G. (2015). Good humor, bad taste: A sociology of the joke. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu, K. W. Y. (2012). Humor styles, self-esteem and subjective happiness. Humor, 1, 21–41.Google Scholar
  33. Love, A. M., & Deckers, L. H. (1989). Humor appreciation as a function of sexual, aggressive, and sexist content. Sex Roles, 20(11–12), 649–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundquist, L. (2014). Danish humor in cross-cultural professional settings: Linguistic and social aspects. Humor—International Journal of Humor Research, 27(1), 141–163. doi: 10.1515/humor-2013-0044.
  35. Lurie, A., & Monahan, K. (2015). Humor, aging, and life review: Survival through the use of humor. Social Work in Mental Health, 13(1), 82–91.Google Scholar
  36. Maemura, Y. (2014). Humor and laughter in Japanese groups: The kuuki of negotiations. Humor—International Journal of Humor Research, 27(1), 103–119. doi: 10.1515/humor-2013-0049.Google Scholar
  37. Manstead, A. S. R., Lea, M., & Goh, J. (2011). Facing the future: Emotion communication and the presence of others in the age of video-mediated communication. In A. Kappas & N. Krämer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the Internet: Issues, research, challenges (pp. 144–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maples, M. F., Dupey, P., Torres-Rivera, E., Phan, L. T., Vereen, L., & Garrett, M. T. (2001). Ethnic diversity and the use of humor in counseling: Appropriate or inappropriate? Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(1), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin, R. A., & Kuiper, N. A. (1999). Daily occurrence of laughter: Relationships with age, gender, and Type A personality. Humor, 12(4), 355–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martineau, W. H. (1972). A model of the social functions of humor. In J. Goldstein &, P. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp. 101–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 214–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2012). Hofstede’s fifth dimension: New evidence from the World Values Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1177/0022022110388567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2014). Clustering of 316 European regions on measures of values: Do Europe’s countries have national cultures? Cross-Cultural Research, 48(2), 144–176. doi: 10.1177/1069397113510866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Murata, K. (2014). An empirical cross-cultural study of humour in business meetings in New Zealand and Japan. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 251–265. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pennington, N., & Hall, J. A. (2014). An analysis of humor orientation on Facebook: A lens model approach. Humor—International Journal of Humor Research, 27(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1515/humor-2013-0053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prerost, F. J. (1995). Sexual desire and the dissipation of anger arousal through humor appreciation; gender and content issues. Social Behavior and Personality, 23(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Müller, L. (2010). Sense of humor among the elderly: Findings using the German version of the SHS. Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 43(1), 19–24. doi: 10.1007/s00391-009-0082-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheel, T., Gerdenitsch, C., & Korunka, C. (2016). Humor at work: Validation of the short work-related Humor Styles Questionnaire (swHSQ). HUMOR, 29(3), 439–465. doi: 10.1515/humor-2015-0118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scheel, T., & Nestler, S. (in preparation). Gender differences in humor use—a meta-analysis.Google Scholar
  51. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Staufenbiel Institut. (2016.). Welche Arbeitszeitmodelle über feste Wochenarbeitszeiten hinaus bietet Ihr Unternehmen den Hochschulabsolventen?. In Statista - Das Statistik-Portal. Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/408854/umfrage/arbeitszeitmodelle-fuer-hochschulabsolventen-in-deutschen-unternehmen/.
  53. Svebak, S., Martin, R. A., & Holmen, J. (2004). The prevalence of sense of humor in a large, unselected county population in Norway: Relations with age, sex, and some health indicators. Humor, 17(1/2), 121–134.Google Scholar
  54. Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(1), 13–23. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199301)49:13.0.CO;2-S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. VATM. (2015). Anzahl der verschickten SMS- und WhatsApp-Nachrichten in Deutschland von 1999 bis 2014 und Prognose für 2015 (in Millionen pro Tag). In Statista - Das Statistik-Portal. Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/3624/umfrage/entwicklung-der-anzahl-gesendeter-sms–mms-nachrichten-seit-1999/.
  56. Vilaythong, A. P., Arnau, R. C., Rosen, D. H., & Mascaro, N. (2003). Humor and hope: Can humor increase hope? Humor, 16(1), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(5), 827–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Work and Organizational PsychologyFernUniversitaet in HagenHagenGermany
  2. 2.SRH University of Applied SciencesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations