Zooarchaeology and Ecology: Mortality Profiles, Species Abundance, Diversity

  • Diane Gifford-Gonzalez
Chapter

Abstract

Chapter 22 reviews analytic methods drawn from general ecology that zooarchaeology has used since its inception over four decades ago. Mortality and taxonomic abundance measures are proxies for past processes that zooarchaeologists hope to monitor, such as hunting strategies, domestic animal management, and impacts of climate change on subsistence. The most useful proxies are those that stipulate a traceable link – physiological, structural, causal – between the proxy and some aspect of the targeted ecological processes or relationships. Given this starting point, chapter critically reviews the history and zooarchaeological applications of mortality profile analysis as a proxy for herd management and hunting. It reviews classic ecological measures of taxonomic richness, abundance, evenness, and diversity, showing how zooarchaeologists have applied such methods to archaeofaunal samples to address a range of human behavioral questions. Zooarchaeology shares a challenge with ecology in using these measures to compare samples: such quantitative measures have been shown to be sensitive to sample size (see Chap. 18 on MNI). Ecologists have devised some means of assessing whether such effects are likely in samples they wish to compare, and archaeologists have applied all of them, including regression analysis and rarefaction. These tests, their limits, and the relevance of sampling to redundancy as a background for comparing zooarchaeological samples are reviewed.

Keywords

Mortality profiles - Herding - Hunting - Species richness - Species abundance - Evenness - Diversity index - Sample area - Rarefaction 

References

  1. Acsádi, G., & Nemeskéri, J. (1970). History of human lifespan and mortality. Budapest: Académiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  2. AllWords.com. (1998–2017). AllWord.com English Dictionary. http://www.allwords.com/word-proxy.html. Accessed 2013, 2017.
  3. Baxter, M. J. (1994). Exploring multivariate analysis in archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Binford, L. R. (1984). Faunal remains from Klasies River Mouth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brochier, J. É. (2013). The use and abuse of culling profiles in recent zooarchaeological studies: Some methodological comments on “frequency correction” and its consequences. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(2), 1416–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buikstra, J. E. (1981). Mortuary practices, paleodemography, and paleopathology: A case study from the Koster Site (Illinois). In R. Chapman, I. Kinnes, & K. Randsborg (Eds.), The archeology of death (pp. 123–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, V. L. (1994). Fish feeding behaviour and fish capture: The case for variation in Lapita fishing strategies. Archaeology in Oceania, 29(2), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caldwell, J. R. (1964). Interaction spheres in prehistory. In J. R. Caldwell & R. L. Hall (Eds.), Hopewellian Studies (Vol. 12, Scientific Papers, pp. 133–143). Springfield: Illinois State Museum.Google Scholar
  9. Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9(2), 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charnov, E. L., Orians, G. H., & Hyatt, K. (1976). Ecological implications of resource depression. American Naturalist, 110(972), 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, J. G. D. (1989). Prehistory at Cambridge and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, J. G. D., Godwin, H., Godwin, M. E., & Clifford, M. H. (1935). Report on recent excavations at Peacock’s Farm, Shippea Hill, Cambridgeshire. Antiquaries Journal, 15(3), 284–319.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, D. L. (1973). Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity, 47(185), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, W. S. (1957). Sir Arthur Tansley and the science of ecology. Ecology, 38(4), 658–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coy, J. (1981). Animal husbandry and faunal exploitation in Hampshire. In S. J. Shennan, & R. T. S. Hall (Eds.), The archaeology of Hampshire: From the Palaeolithic to the Industrial Revolution (Vol. 1, Monograph, pp. 95–103). Hampshire: Hampshire Field Club and Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
  16. Cribb, R. (1985). The analysis of ancient herding systems: An application of computer simulation in faunal studies. In G. Barker & C. Gamble (Eds.), Beyond domestication in prehistoric Europe: Investigations in subsistence archaeology and social complexity (pp. 75–106). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dahl, G., & Hjort, A. (1976). Having Herds: Pastoral Herd Growth and Household Economy (Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology) (Vol. 2). Stockholm: Department of Anthropology, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
  18. Deevy, E. S., Jr. (1947). Life tables for natural populations of animals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 22(4), 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flannery, K. V. (1965). The ecology of early food production in Mesopotamia. Science, 147(3663), 1247–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flannery, K. V. (1967). Culture history v. culture process: A debate in American archaeology. Scientific American, 217(2), 119–122.Google Scholar
  21. Forde, C. D. (1934). Habitat, economy and society: A geographical introduction to ethnology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  22. Frison, G. C., & Reher, C. A. (1970). The Glenrock Buffalo Jump, 48CO304: Late prehistoric period buffalo procurement and butchering. Plains Anthropologist, 15(50), 1–45.Google Scholar
  23. Gifford, D. P., Isaac, G. L., & Nelson, C. M. (1980). Evidence for predation and pastoralism at Prolonged Drift, a Pastoral Neolithic site in Kenya. Azania, 15, 57–108.Google Scholar
  24. Gifford-Gonzalez, D. (2003). The fauna from Ele Bor: Evidence for the persistence of foragers into the later Holocene of arid north Kenya. African Archaeological Review, 20(2), 81–119.Google Scholar
  25. González, M. E., Álvarez, M. C., Massigoge, A., Gutiérrez, M. A., & Kaufmann, C. A. (2012). Differential bone survivorship and ontogenetic development in guanaco (Lama guanicoe). International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 22(5), 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gotelli, N. J., & Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4(4), 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grant, A. (1983). The use of tooth wear as a guide to the age of domestic ungulates. In B. Wilson, C. Grigson, & S. Payne (Eds.), Ageing and sexing animal bones from archaeological sites (Vol. 109, pp. 91–108). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British Series.Google Scholar
  28. Grayson, D. K. (1981). The effects of sample size on some derived measures in vertebrate faunal analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 8(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grayson, D. K. (1984). Quantitative zooarchaeology. Topics in the analysis of archaeological faunas. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Grayson, D. K. (1989). Bone transport, bone destruction, and reverse utility curves. Journal of Archaeological Science, 16(6), 643–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grayson, D. K. (1998). Moisture history and small mammal community richness during the latest Pleistocene and Holocene, northern Bonneville Basin, Utah. Quaternary Research, 49(3), 330–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grayson, D. K., & Delpech, F. (1998). Changing diet breadth in the early Upper Paleolithic of southwestern France. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25(11), 1119–1129.Google Scholar
  33. Grayson, D. K., & Delpech, F. (2006). Was there increasing dietary specialization across the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition in France? In N. Conard (Ed.), When Neanderthals and modern humans met (pp. 377–417). Tübingen: Tübingen Publications in Prehistory, Kerns Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Haberman, S. (1996). Landmarks in the history of actuarial science (up to 1919). In Department of Actuarial Science and Statistics (Ed.), Actuarial Research Paper (Vol. 84). London: City University.Google Scholar
  35. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Pyan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm. Accessed 2017.
  36. Heip, C. (1974). A new index measuring evenness. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 555–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hodder, I. (2011). Human-thing entanglement: Towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(1), 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holland, S. M. (2003). Analytical Rarefaction Software V1.3. http://strata.uga.edu/software/anRareReadme.html. Accessed 2005, 2017.
  39. Homewood, K. M., & Rogers, W. A. (1991). Maasailand Ecology: Pastoralist development and wildlife conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hoppa, R. D., & Vaupel, J. W. (2002). Paleodemography: Age distribution from skeletal samples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ingold, T. (1980). Hunters, pastoralists, and ranchers: reindeer economies and their transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kirksey, E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography: A special guest-edited issue of cultural anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klein, R. G. (1978). Stone Age predation on large African bovids. Journal of Archaeological Science, 5(3), 195–217.Google Scholar
  44. Klein, R. G. (1981). Stone Age predation on small African bovids. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 36(134), 55–65.Google Scholar
  45. Klein, R. G. (1982). Age (mortality) profiles as a means of distinguishing hunted species from scavenged ones in Stone Age archeological sites. Paleobiology, 8(2), 151–158.Google Scholar
  46. Klein, R. G. (1983). The Stone Age prehistory of southern Africa. Annual Review of Anthropology 12(1):25–48Google Scholar
  47. Klein, R. G. (1989). Why does skeletal part representation differ between smaller and larger bovids at Klasies River mouth and other archaeological sites? Journal of Archaeological Science, 16(4), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Klein, R. G., & Cruz-Uribe, K. (1984). The analysis of animal bones from archaeological sites. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Klein, R. G., Wolf, C., Freeman, L. G., & Allwarden, K. (1981). The use of dental crown heights for constructing age profiles of red deer and similar species from archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 8(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Klein, R. G., Allwarden, K., & Wolf, C. (1983). The calculation and interpretation of ungulate age profiles from dental crown heights. In G. N. Bailey (Ed.), Hunter-gatherer economy in prehistory: A European perspective (pp. 47–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Konigsberg, L. W., & Frankenberg, S. R. (1994). Paleodemography: “Not quite dead.” Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 3(3), 92–105.Google Scholar
  52. Krebs, J. R., Ryan, J. C., & Charnov, E. L. (1974). Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging? A study of patch use by chickadees. Animal Behaviour, 22(4), 953–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Krebs, J. R., Kacelnik, A., & Taylor, P. (1978). Test of optimal sampling by foraging great tits. Nature, 275(5675), 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kurtén, B. (1953). On the variation and population dynamics of fossil and recent mammal populations. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 76, 159–178.Google Scholar
  55. Levine, M. A. (1982). The use of crown height measurements and eruption-wear sequences to age horse teeth. In B. Wilson, C. Grigson, & S. Payne (Eds.), Ageing and sexing animal bones from archaeological sites (Vol. 109, pp. 223–250). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British Series.Google Scholar
  56. Levine, M. A. (1983). Mortality models and the interpretation of horse population structure. In G. N. Bailey (Ed.), Hunter-Gatherer economy in prehistory: A European perspective (pp. 23–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Levine, M. A. (1990). Dereivka and the problem of horse domestication. Antiquity, 64(245), 727–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lyman, R. L. (1984). Bone density and differential survivorship in fossil classes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 3(4), 259–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lyman, R. L. (1985). Bone frequencies, differential transport, and the MGUI. Journal of Archaeological Science, 12(3), 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lyman, R. L. (1994). Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Lyman, R. L. (2008). Quantitative Paleozoology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lyman, R. L., & Ames, K. M. (2007). On the use of species-area curves to detect the effects of sample size. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(12), 1985–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring biological diversity. Malden: Blackwell Science Ltd.Google Scholar
  65. Marean, C. W. (1995). Of taphonomy and zooarcheology: Review of Lyman's Vertebrate Taphonomy. Evolutionary Anthropology, 4(2), 64–72.Google Scholar
  66. Marean, C. W., & Assefa, Z. (2005). The Middle and Upper Pleistocene African record for the biological and behavioral origins of modern humans. In A. B. Stahl (Ed.), African archaeology: A critical introduction (pp. 93–129). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  67. Munson, P. J. (2000). Age-correlated differential destruction of bones and its effect on archaeological mortality profiles of domestic sheep and goats. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27(5), 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Munson, P. J., & Garniewicz, R. C. (2003). Age-mediated survivorship of ungulate mandibles and teeth in canid-ravaged faunal assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30(4), 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nims, R., Gifford-Gonzalez, D., Hylkema, M., & Potenzone, K. (2016). The CA-SCR-9 archaeofauna: Prey choice, seasonality, and processing. Journal of California and Great Basin anthropology, 36(2), 245–269.Google Scholar
  70. Payne, S. (1973). Kill-off patterns in sheep and goats: The mandibles from Aşvan Kale. Anatolian Studies, 23, 281–303.Google Scholar
  71. Pielou, E. C. (1966). Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10(2), 370–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., & Charnov, E. L. (1977). Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 52(2), 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reher, C. A. (1970). Appendix II: Population dynamics of the Glenrock Bison bison population. Plains Anthropologist, 15(50), 51–55.Google Scholar
  74. Reher, C. A. (1973). Appendix II: The Wardell Bison bison sample: Population dynamics and archaeological interpretation. In The Wardell Buffalo Trap, 48SH301: Communal Procurement in the Upper Green River Basin, Wyoming (Vol. 48, pp. 89–105, Anthropological Papers of the Museum of Anthropology).Google Scholar
  75. Reher, C. A. (1974). Population study of the Casper Site bison. In G. C. Frison (Ed.), The Casper Site: A Hell Gap bison kill on the High Plains (pp. 113–124). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  76. Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Schmitt, D. N., & Juell, K. E. (1994). Toward the identification of coyote scatological faunal accumulations in archaeological contexts. Journal of Archaeological Science, 21(2), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schmitt, D. N., & Lupo, K. D. (1995). On mammalian taphonomy, taxonomic diversity, and measuring subsistence data in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity, 60(3), 496–514.Google Scholar
  79. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(4), 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Simberloff, D., & Boecklen, W. (1981). Santa Rosalia reconsidered: Size ratios and competition. Evolution, 35(6), 1206–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stahl, P. W. (1992). Diversity, body size, and the archaeological recovery of mammalian faunas in the neotropical forests. Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society, 20(1–2), 209–233.Google Scholar
  82. Steward, J. H. (1936). The economic and social basis of primitive bands. In R. H. Lowie (Ed.), Essays in anthropology, presented to A. L. Kroeber in celebration of his sixtieth birthday (pp. 331–350). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  83. Steward, J. H. (1949). Cultural causality and law: A trial formulation of the development of early civilizations. American Anthropologist, 51(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stiner, M. C. (1990). The use of mortality patterns in archaeological studies of hominid predatory adaptations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 9(4), 305–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stiner, M. C. (1994). Honor among thieves: A zooarchaeological study of Neandertal ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Stiner, M. C. (2002). On in situ attrition and vertebrate body part profiles. Journal of Archaeological Science, 29(9), 979–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307.Google Scholar
  88. Voorhies, M. R. (1969). Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska. Wyoming University Contributions in Geology, Special Paper, 1, 1–69.Google Scholar
  89. Weaver, T. D., Boyko, R. H., & Steele, T. E. (2011). Cross-platform program for likelihood-based statistical comparisons of mortality profiles on a triangular graph. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(9), 2420–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wedel, W. R. (1953). Some aspects of human ecology in the Central Plains. American Anthropologist, 55(4), 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Willis, A. J. (1997). The ecosystem: An evolving concept viewed historically. Functional Ecology, 11(2), 268–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Young, T. M. (2014). Biodiversity calculator. http://www.alyoung.com/labs/biodiversity_calculator.html. Accessed 2014, 2017.
  93. Zeder, M. A. (1991). Feeding cities: Specialized animal economy in the Ancient Near East. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  94. Zohar, I., & Belmaker, M. (2005). Size does matter: Methodological comments on sieve size and species richness in fishbone assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32(4), 635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane Gifford-Gonzalez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations