Demand Side Management Using Chicken Swarm Optimization

  • Zafar Faiz
  • Tamour Bilal
  • Muhammad Awais
  • Pamir
  • Sundas Gull
  • Nadeem Javaid
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 8)

Abstract

In this paper, two meta-heuristic techniques Chicken Swarm Optimization (CSO) and Enhanced Differential Evolution (EDE) are used for demand side management. We have integrated Traditional Grids with Demand Side Management (DSM) We have categorized appliances in two categories; fixed and shiftable/elastic appliances. Real Time Pricing (RTP) is used for calculation of electricity cost. The objective of our work is to minimize electricity bill, increase user comfort, and reduced peak to average ratio. As the simulation results show that CSO gives better results as we compared with EDE in terms of electricity cost and waiting time.

References

  1. 1.
    Khalid, A., Javaid, N., Mateen, A., Khalid, B.: Demand side management using hybrid bacterial foraging and genetic algorithm optimization techniques. In: CISIS (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zafar, A., Shah, S., Khalid, R., Hussain, S.M.: A meta-heuristic home energy management system, January 2017Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nojavan, Z., Zare, K., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B.: Selling price determination by electricity retailer in the Smart Grid under demand side management in the presence of the electrolyser and fuel cell as hydrogen storage system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42(5), 3294–3308 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu, Z., Tang, J., Lambotharan, S., Chin, W.H., Fan, Z.: An integer linear programming based optimization for home demand-side management in Smart Grid. IEEE (2011). 978-1-4577-2159-5/12/31.00Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ma, J., Chen, H., Song, L., Li, Y.: Residential load scheduling in Smart Grid: a cost efficiency perspective. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(2), 771–784 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao, Z., Lee, W.C., Shin, Y., Song, K.B.: An optimal power scheduling method for demand response in home energy management system. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4(3), 1391–1400 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Javaid, N., Javaid, S., Wadood, A., Ahmed, I., Almogren, A., Alamri, A., Niaz, I.A.: A hybrid genetic wind driven heuristic optimization algorithm for demand side management in smart grid, Version 5 February 2017, submitted to EnergiesGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barbato, A., Capone, A., Chen, L., Martignon, F., Paris, S.: A distributed demand-side management framework for the Smart Grid. Comput. Commun. 57, 13–24 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reka, S.S., Ramesh, V.: A demand response modeling for residential consumers in smart grid environment using game theory based energy scheduling algorithm. Ain Shams Eng. J. 7, 835–845 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma, K., Yao, T., Yang, J., Guan, X.: Residential power scheduling for demand response in Smart Grid. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 78, 320–325 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahim, S., Javaid, N., Ahmad, A., Khan, S.A., Khanb, Z.A., Alrajehc, N., Qasim, U.: Exploiting heuristic algorithms to efficiently utilize energy management controllers with renewable energy sources. Energy Build. 129, 452–470 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Samadi, P., Wong, V.W.S., Schober, R.: Load scheduling and power trading in systems with high penetration of renewable energy resources. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(4), July 2016Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yuce, B., Rezgui, Y., Mourshed, M.: ANN-GA smart appliance scheduling for optimised energy management in the domestic sector. Energy Build. 111, 311–325 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahmeda, M.S., Mohameda, A., Khatibc, T., Shareefd, H., Homode, R.Z., Ali, J.A.: Real time optimal schedule controller for home energy management system using new binary backtracking search algorithm. Energy Build. 138, 215–227 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khourya, J., Mbayedb, R., Salloumb, G., Monmasson, E.: Predictive demand side management of a residential house under intermittent primary energy source conditions. Energy Build. 112, 110–120 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qu, C., Zhao, S., Fu, Y., He, W.: Chicken swarm optimization based on elite opposition based learning. Math. Probl. Eng. 2017, 26 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zafar Faiz
    • 1
  • Tamour Bilal
    • 1
  • Muhammad Awais
    • 1
  • Pamir
    • 1
  • Sundas Gull
    • 2
  • Nadeem Javaid
    • 1
  1. 1.COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Bahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan

Personalised recommendations