Skip to main content

A Rudimentary Approach to Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Guided Improvised Explosive Device Shrapnel Dispersal Simulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS 2017)

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology to compute, model and simulate a Directionally Focused Charge (DFC) explosive, delivered and deployed on an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), with simple particle game engine physics heuristics, for estimating shrapnel trajectories and areas of impact on an urban terrain. As a preliminary study, we model a simple DFC explosive, also known as a directionally focused fragmentary charge, which is composed of a flat top and fixed sized metal canister containing nuts, bolts and ball bearings. The simulation models a small UAV capable of delivering a maximum payload of 10 kg within a flight distance of 5 km. The simulated UAV is modeled after a commonly available heavy lift commercial drone. The terrain dataset is obtained through Google Earth Engine’s public data catalog – a standard Earth science raster dataset. We assert that this methodology can provide response and counter-IED teams involved in explosive threat detection with relevant information pertaining to the estimates of the risk associated with significant shrapnel impact in urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chan, C.C., Ferworn, A., Young, C.M.: Serious gaming for improvised explosive device neutralization training. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 68, p. 02006 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan, J.M.: Revolution or evolution? The rise of the UAVs, in technology and society. In: Proceedings of 2005 International Symposium on Weapons and Wires: Prevention and Safety in a Time of Fear, ISTAS 2005, pp. 94–101 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miasnikov, E.: Threat of terrorism using unmanned aerial vehicles: technical aspects, Moscow, Russia: Center for Arms Control, Energy, and Environmental Studies, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mandelbaum, J., Ralston, J., Gutmanis, I., Hull, A., Martin, C.: Terrorist use of improvised or commercially available precision-guided UAVs at stand-off ranges: an approach for formulating mitigation considerations, DTIC Document (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vish, J.A.: Guided Standoff Weapons: A Threat to Expeditionary Air Power, DTIC Document (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, F., Frost, D., Thibault, P., Murray, S.: Explosive dispersal of solid particles. Shock Waves 10(6), 431–443 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. U. G. Engine: Unity Game Engine-Official Site, pp. 1534–4320. http://unity3d.com. Accessed 9 Oct 2008

  8. Mays, G., Smith, P.D.: Blast Effects on Buildings: Design of Buildings to Optimize Resistance to Blast Loading. Thomas Telford, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Directional charge explosive device: Google Patents (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Directional warhead: Google Patents (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campion, T.: Family of Multi-Purpose Infantry Munition Systems MPIMS. Small Arms Defense J. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nealen, A., Müller, M., Keiser, R., Boxerman, E., Carlson, M.: Physically based deformable models in computer graphics. Comput. Graph. Forum 25(4), 809–836 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yngve, G.D., O’Brien, J.F., Hodgins, J.K.: Animating explosions. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 29–36 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neff, M., Fiume, E.: A visual model for blast waves and fracture. Graph. Interface 99, 193–202 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reeves, W.T.: Particle systems—a technique for modeling a class of fuzzy objects. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 2(2), 91–108 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sims, K.: Particle animation and rendering using data parallel computation. Newslett. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 24(4), 405–413 (1990). ACM

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wan, T.R., Tang, W.: Explosive impact on real-time. In: Vince, J., Earnshaw, R. (eds.) Advances in Modelling, Animation and Rendering, pp. 247–265. Springer, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Popat, N., Catlin, C., Arntzen, B., Lindstedt, R., Hjertager, B.H., Solberg, T., Saeter, O., Van den Berg, A.: Investigations to improve and assess the accuracy of computational fluid dynamic based explosion models. J. Hazard. Mater. 45(1), 1–25 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Y., Beom, H., Sun, M., Lin, S.: Numerical simulation of explosive welding using the material point method. Int. J. Impact Eng. 38(1), 51–60 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Selle, A., Rasmussen, N., Fedkiw, R.: A vortex particle method for smoke, water and explosions. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 24(3), 910–914 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rami, N., Proctor, M.D.: Real time physically-based modeling and simulation of cratering and fragmentation of terrain. Simulation 83(12), 830–841 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Melosh, H., Ryan, E., Asphaug, E.: Dynamic fragmentation in impacts: hydrocode simulation of laboratory impacts. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 97(E9), 14735–14759 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cioppa, T.M., Lucas, T.W., Sanchez, S.M.: Military applications of agent-based simulations. In: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Winter simulation, pp. 171–180 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, R.D.: Essential techniques for military modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Winter Simulation, pp. 805–812 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt, R.M., Housen, K.R.: Some recent advances in the scaling of impact and explosion cratering. Int. J. Impact Eng. 5(1–4), 543–560 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lisle, R.J.: Google Earth: a new geological resource. Geol. Today 22(1), 29–32 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brouillette, M.: Heavy lifting drones fill a niche. Mech. Eng. 139(2), 23 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher C. K. Chan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chan, C.C.K., Ferworn, A., Tran, D. (2018). A Rudimentary Approach to Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Guided Improvised Explosive Device Shrapnel Dispersal Simulation. In: Barolli, L., Woungang, I., Hussain, O. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems. INCoS 2017. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65636-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65636-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65635-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65636-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics