Advertisement

Exploring Ethical Relations to Self and New Ontologies

Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 16)

Abstract

With the recent move towards activism and engagement with ethical issues through science education, it is more important than ever to examine the ethical dimensions of education and practice. In dealing with the issue of consumerism, and the economic regimes that challenge our ability to maintain healthy environments for community wellbeing, it is important to closely examine how students and teachers come to think of themselves as ethical subjects. In addition, it is important to understand that our social world has been bound by modern distinctions between what is human/non–human, biotic/abiotic, which may prevent communities from engaging ethically in issues of ecological and social justice. Using the work of Michel Foucault, Karen Barad, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, we argue for (a) a more complex understanding of the ethical subject in education through an understanding of relations of self along three axes: self to self, self to others, and self to the world; and (b) a reconsideration of the place of this ‘ethical subject’ by engaging social ontologies and new materialisms.

Keywords

Ethics Subjectivity Foucault Ontology Science education 

References

  1. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831Google Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2012). Nature’s Queer performativity. Kvinder, Koenog Forskning, 21, 25–54.Google Scholar
  5. Bazzul, J. (2012). Neoliberal ideology, global capitalism, and science education: Engaging the question of subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 1001–1020. doi: 10.1007/s11422–012–9413–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bazzul, J. (2014a). Critical discourse analysis and science education texts: Employing Foucauldian notions of discourse and subjectivity. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 36(5), 422–437. doi: 10.1080/10714413.2014.958381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazzul, J. (2014b). Tracing “ethical subjectivities” in science education: How biology textbooks can frame ethico–political choices for students. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11165–014–9411–4.Google Scholar
  8. Bazzul, J. (2015). Towards a political subjectivity for science education: Dissensus and the reconfiguration of the sensible. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 15(3), 221–233. doi: 10.1080/14926156.2015.1051670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Toward a social ontology for science education: Introducing Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(3), 284–299.Google Scholar
  10. Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669. doi: 10.1002/tea.20419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, L. (2011). Gathering in threads in the insensible global world: The wicked problem of globalisation and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11422–010–9307–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. New York: A&C Black.Google Scholar
  15. DeLanda, M. (2012, October 30). Assemblage theory and social institutions. 2011. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZePCx8YUys
  16. Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality, Vol II. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1986). The care of the self: The history of sexuality, Vol. 3. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  20. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 1968. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Herder.Google Scholar
  21. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2010.500628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazzarrato, M. (2013). Enunciation and politics. In S. O. Wallenstein & J. Nilsson (Eds.), Foucault, biopolitics, and governmentality (pp. 155–173). Stockholm: E–print.Google Scholar
  25. Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  26. Mueller, M. P. (2009). Educational reflections on the “ecological crisis”: Ecojustice, environmentalism, and sustainability. Science & Education, 18(8), 1031–1056. doi: 10.1007/s11191–008–9179–x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pierce, C. (2012). Education in the age of biocapitalism: Optimizing educational life for a flat world. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  28. Rancière, J., & Corcoran, S. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  29. Weinstein, M. (2008). Finding science in the school body: Reflections on transgressing the boundaries of science education and the social studies of science. Science Education, 92(3), 389–403. doi: 10.1002/sce.20267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Žižek, S. (2011). Living in the end times. New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ReginaReginaCanada
  2. 2.University of Massachusetts DartmouthDartmouthUSA

Personalised recommendations