The Role of Curriculum Documents in Youth’s Ideological Upbringing: Consuming or Loving the World?

  • Snežana Ratković
  • Dragana Martinovic
  • Trevor Norris
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 16)

Abstract

Canadian Geographic is one of the best–known environmentally–oriented magazines in Canada, widely used in schools across the country in geography and science classes. Recently, the magazine has partnered with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), which is portrayed as a non–partisan non–profit organization but is widely recognized as an advocate for the Canadian Oil and Natural Gas industry. Thus, students may learn about the flows of rivers, patterns of species’ migrations, and the natural world from the perspective of the oil and gas industry. In this chapter, we explore Ontario Grades 1 to 8 mathematics, science, and social studies, history, and geography curricula using sociocultural perspectives and summative content analysis research methodology. We conclude that the analysed curricula focus on using and changing the Earth to satisfy human needs rather than on loving the Earth and giving back to it; the curricula reinforce a consumerist approach to the world by accepting human needs as given, not inquiring into how these needs are constructed, how they are enacted, or how they impact the ecological world.

Keywords

Youth consumerism K–8 Curricula Sustainability Ecopedagogy Ontario 

References

  1. Antunes, A., & Gadotti, M. (2005). Eco–pedagogy as the appropriate pedagogy to the earth charter process. In P. B. Corcoran, M. Vilela, & A. Roerink (Eds.), The Earth charter in action: Toward a sustainable world (pp. 135–137). Amsterdam: KIT Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, M. (1995). Taking power seriously: New directions in equity in mathematics education and beyond. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 329–348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, A. C., & Russell, C. L. (2000). Beyond human, beyond words: Anthropocentrism, critical pedagogy, and the poststructuralist turn. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(3), 188–203. doi: 10.2307/1585953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bencze, J. L. (2011). Science education as/for consumerism. Journal for Activism in Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 44–51.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, A. J. (1995). Western mathematics: The secret weapon of cultural imperialism. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The post–colonial studies reader (pp. 71–76). New York: Routledge. (Reprinted from Race and class, 32, 51–65, 1990).Google Scholar
  6. Carey, J. W., Morgan, M., & Oxtoby, M. J. (1996). Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open–ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. CAM, 8, 1–5. doi: 10.1177/1525822x960080030101.Google Scholar
  7. Department for Education and Skills. (1999). The national curriculum handbook for primary teachers in England. London: DFES & QCA.Google Scholar
  8. Ecological Society of America. (2016). Earth Stewardship: Sustaining and enhancing Earth’s life–support systems. Retrieved from http://www.esa.org/esa/science/earth–stewardship/
  9. Environmental education (2009). Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Acting today, shaping tomorrow: A policy framework for environmental education in Ontario schools. Toronto, ON. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/teachers/enviroed/action.html
  10. Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogia da autonomia: Saberes necessários à prática educativa. (Pedagogy of autonomy: Necessary wisdoms to the educational practices). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
  11. Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Toronto: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  13. Hsieh, H.–. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahn, R. (2008). From education for sustainable development to ecopedagogy: Sustaining capitalism or sustaining life? Green Theory & Praxis: The Journal of Ecopedagogy, 4(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  15. MacQueen, K. M., McLellan–Lemal, E., Bartholow, K., & Milstein, G. (2008). Team–based codebook development: Structure, process, and agreement. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team–based qualitative research (pp. 119–135). Lanham: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mark, J. (2013, September 10). Naomi Klein: “Big green groups are more damaging than climate deniers.” Earth Island Journal. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/sep/10/naomi-klein-green-groupsclimate-deniers
  17. Neil, G. (June 2014). Classroom inquiries: Canada’s energy resources and reserves. Canadian Geographic Education. Retrieved from https://energyiq.canadiangeographic.ca/learning_centre/topic/1507/Classroom-Inquiries-Canadas-Energy-Resources-and-Reserves
  18. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). The Ontario curriculum grades 1 to 8: Mathematics. Toronto, Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  19. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). The Ontario curriculum grades 1 to 8: Science and technology. Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
  20. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2013). The Ontario curriculum: Social studies grades 1 to 6 and history and geography grades 7 and 8. Toronto, Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  21. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). Achieving excellence: A renewed vision for education in Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/about/renewed Vision.pdf.
  22. Orr, D. (1991). What is education for? Six myths about the foundations of modern education, and six new principles to replace them. The Learning Revolution, 27. Retrieved from http://www.context.org/iclib/ic27/orr/
  23. Ratković, S. (2015). Militarism, motherhood, and teaching: A Yugoslav–Canadian case. In N. Taber (Ed.), Learning gendered militarism in Canada (pp. 147–172). Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
  24. The Royal Canadian Geographical Society. (2014, June). Energy rich: Exploring the top resources powering our nation. Canadian Geography Magazine. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Snežana Ratković
    • 1
  • Dragana Martinovic
    • 2
  • Trevor Norris
    • 1
  1. 1.Brock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  2. 2.University of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations