Advertisement

Selection of Indicators of Urban Sustainability and Quality of Life of City Inhabitants

  • Rosalba D’Onofrio
  • Massimo Sargolini
  • Michele Talia
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

The quality of European landscapes and the quality of life of city inhabitants are closely related to economic, social, and cultural aspects that are manifest in time and space. This connection, interacting with the local economy, responds to the recreational, emotional, and spiritual needs and the sense of identity of the community, as the Mercer survey and Eurobarometer have highlighted. If our cities are unsustainable, as often happens, the urban landscape could/should become the litmus paper that allows the state of places to be synthetically interpreted and supports the delineation of indications to solve the problems (Benson and Roe 2007). When following this road, it is necessary to consider the technical aspects of sustainability policies—such as energy savings, recycling, environmental management, etc.—and non-technical aspects such as social behaviours and spatial organization. All of these aspects together, in addition to the way in which they interact, contribute to determining the characteristics of a given urban landscape and the quality of life of city inhabitants. The continuous “feedback” between sustainability and quality of the urban landscape and their interaction with the quality of life of city inhabitants have been the subject of numerous studies and reflections in the contemporary scientific panorama. In this respect, the 2010 book by Claudia Dinep and Kristin Schwab Sustainable Site Design Criteria, Process, and Case Studies for Integrating Site and Region in Landscape Design highlights how “…urban sustainability is fundamentally the sustainability of the urban landscape as a whole”. In a 2004 essay, MacKendrick and Parkins maintained that the sustainability of the urban landscape could be defined as the capacity of a landscape system to generate and maintain conditions for a safe, harmonious, and adequate environment of life that respects ecosystems (MacKendrick and Parkins 2004).

References

  1. Baker N, Steemers K (1992) The LTmethod. In: Goulding JR, Owen Lewis J, Steemers TC (eds) Energy in architecture: the European passive solar handbook. Batsford for the Commission of the European Community, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson J, Roe M (eds) (2007) Landscape and sustainability, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berghauser Pont M, Haupt P (2011) Spacematrix: space, density and urban form. NAi Publishers, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Faucheux S, Froger G, Munda G (1997) Toward an integration of uncertainty, irreversibility, and complexity in environmental decision making. In: van den Bergh JCJM, Van der Straaten J (eds) Economy and ecosystems in change. Analytical and historical approaches. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 50–74Google Scholar
  5. MacKendrick NA, Parkins JR (2004) Framework for assessing community sustainability: a synthesis of current research in British Columbia. Northern Forestry Centre, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller D, Patassini D (eds) (2005) Beyond benefit cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  7. Morello E, Ratti C (2009) SunScapes: ‘solar envelopes’ and the analysis of urban DEMs. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Puerari E (2011) Valutare la sostenibilità nella progettazione urbana: un approccio integrato. Post Graduate Thesis Politecnico di Milano. https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/46561?locale=en
  9. Rosales N (2010) Towards a design of sustainable cities: incorporating sustainable indicators in urban planning. 46 th ISOCARP Congress. Retrieved from: http://www.isocarp.net/Data/case_studies/1715.pdf (07 Dec 2016)
  10. Salat S, Nowacki C (2010) De l’importance de la morphologie dans l’efficience énergétique des villes. Liaison Energie Francophonie, 86Google Scholar
  11. Simon HA (1976) From substantive to procedural rationality. In: Latsis JS (ed) Methods and appraisal in economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalba D’Onofrio
    • 1
  • Massimo Sargolini
    • 1
  • Michele Talia
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Architecture and DesignUniversity of CamerinoAscoli PicenoItaly

Personalised recommendations