Use of Decision-Support Systems in Defining Scenarios for Sustainable, Shared Urban Development

  • Roberta Cocci Grifoni
  • Rosalba D’Onofrio
  • Massimo Sargolini
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)


The subject of sustainability requires the integration of various areas of disciplinary knowledge and in particular, knowledge related to the overall management and dynamics of ecological and social systems. Traditionally, the different disciplines have addressed the theme of sustainability by developing mathematical models and using indicators to measure the different aspects. However, not all of these aspects can be measured in quantitative terms (Bell and Morse 2008; Pollesch and Dale 2015).


  1. Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:769–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell S, Morse S (2008) Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable, 2nd edn. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop P, Hines A, Collins T (2007) The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight 9(1):5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burinskiene M, Rudzkiene V (2009) Future insights, scenarios and expert method application in sustainable territorial planning. Technol Econ Dev Econ 15(1):10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chermack TJ, Lynham SA (2004) Scenario planning in critical science research. Futur Res Q 20(2):41–60Google Scholar
  6. Gahin R, Veleva V, Hart M (2003) Do indicators help create sustainable communities? Local Environ 8(6):661–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giupponi C (2010) Modelli scientifici e modelli di policy per l'adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici. In: Agriregionieuropa year 6 no. 21, June 2010.
  8. Hakim C (2000) Research design: successful designs for social and economic research. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Hemphill L, McGreal S, Berry J (2004) An indicator based approach to measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance: part 1, conceptual foundations and methodological framework. Urban Stud 41:725–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunt DVL, Lombardi DR, Rogers CDF, Jefferson I (2008) Application of sustainability indicators in decision-making processes for urban regeneration projects. Proc Inst Civil Eng Eng Sustain 161(1):77–91Google Scholar
  11. Imrie R, Thomas H (1995) Changes in local governance and their implications for urban policy evaluation. In: Hambleton R, Thomas H (eds) Urban policy evaluation: challenge and change. Paul Chapman, London, pp 123–138Google Scholar
  12. Maclaren V (1996) Urban sustainability reporting. J Am Plan Assoc 62(2):184–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60:498–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oke TR (1973) City size and the urban heat island. Atmos Environ 7:76–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oke TR (2004) Siting and exposure of meteorological instruments at urban sites. In: Air pollution modelling and its application, proceedings of 27th NATO/CCMS international technical meeting, Banff, 25–29 October 2004Google Scholar
  16. Pollesch N, Dale VH (2015) Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 114:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scerri A, James P (2010) Accounting for sustainability: combining qualitative and quantitative research in developing ‘indicators’ of sustainability. Int J Soc Res Methodol 13(1):41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Siniscalco D (2002) Chair’s conclusions. In: Towards sustainable development. Indicators to measure progress. Proceedings of the oecd rome conference. Organization for Economic Co-opera-tion and Development (OECD), Paris, pp 13–16Google Scholar
  19. Stewart ID, Oke TR (2009) Classifying urban climate field sites by ‘local climate zones’: the case of Nagano, Japan. In: 7th international conference on urban climate, ICUC, Tokyo, Yokohama, Japan, 29 June–3 July 2009Google Scholar
  20. Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environ Chang 14:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tonin S (2007) Accordi volontari: considerazioni sull'efficacia ed efficienza dello strumento. In: Brunori G, Marangon F, Reho M (eds) La gestione del paesaggio rurale tra governo e governance territoriale. FrancoAngeli, MilanGoogle Scholar
  22. Turban E (1990) Decision support and expert systems: management support systems, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Wiek A, Binder C (2005) Solution spaces for decision-making—a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25:589–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wong C (2002) Developing indicators to inform economic development in England. Urban Stud 39(10):1833–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta Cocci Grifoni
    • 1
  • Rosalba D’Onofrio
    • 1
  • Massimo Sargolini
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Architecture and DesignUniversity of CamerinoAscoli PicenoItaly

Personalised recommendations