Skip to main content

Of Heroes and Cowards: A Computer-Based Analysis of Narratives Justifying the Use of Force

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Researching Emotions in International Relations

Abstract

How can we detect narratives that legitimize the use of force? Using the ‘hero-protector narrative’ as a theoretical model to understand how political leaders manufacture collective emotions when advocating the use of force as the only effective and morally acceptable option, we show how such an argument can be tested using computer-assisted narrative analysis. Based on a case study of political speeches and statements legitimizing-and others rejecting-the use of force in the context of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, we suggest that our methodology offers an innovative approach to uncover similarities (and differences) across narratives used to mobilize collective emotions of moral anger and compassion .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We used the letters A for ‘aggression’, A bis for ‘aggression in the past’, R for ‘reaction’, R bis for ‘reaction in the past’, and N for ‘future end state’, which correspond to the five narrative sequences.

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (2004). Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy. Sociological Theory, 22(4), 527–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anker, E. (2005). Villains, Victims and Heroes: Melodrama, Media, and September 11. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1977). Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives. In R. Barthes & S. Heath (Eds.), Image, Music, Text (pp. 79–124). London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. (2015). Found in Translation: Combining Discourse Analysis with Computer Assisted Content Analysis. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 984–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (1993). La souffrance à distance: morale humanitaire, médias et politique. Paris: Editions Métailié.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brader, T., & Marcus, G. E. (2013). Emotion and Political Psychology. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 165–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2010). Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clément, M. (2014). Al-Muhajiroun in the United Kingdom: The Role of International Non-recognition in Heightened Radicalization Dynamics. Global Discourse, 4(4), 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, M. (2011). Gender, Nationalism, and War: Conflict on the Movie Screen. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, R. (2010). Quantitative Narrative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammack, P. L. (2014). Mind, Story, Society: The Political Psychology of Narrative. In M. Hanne, W. D. Crano, & J. S. Mio (Eds.), Warring with Words: Narrative and Metaphor in Politics (pp. 51–77). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammack, P. L., & Pilecki, A. (2014). Methodological Approaches in Political Psychology: Discourse and Narrative. In P. Nesbitt-Larking, C. Kinnvall, T. Capelos, & H. Dekker (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology (pp. 72–89). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. M. (2006). The Study of Emotion: An Introduction. In S. Clarke, P. Hoggett, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Emotion, Politics and Society (pp. 3–30). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. J. (2001). Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschut, S. (2014). Emotional (Security) Communities: The Significance of Emotion Norms in Inter-allied Conflict Management. Review of International Studies, 40(3), 533–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R. N. (2010). Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, T. (2010). Causes of War: The Struggle for Recognition. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, L. H. M. (2014). Decolonizing the International: Towards Multiple Emotional Worlds. International Theory, 6(3), 579–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (2007). Distant Suffering and Cosmopolitan Obligations. International Politics, 44(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (2014). Anger and World Politics: How Collective Emotions Shift Over Time. International Theory, 6(3), 574–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1971). The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup Emotions: Explaining Offensive Action Tendencies in an Intergroup Context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2005). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1996). Compassion: The Basic Social Emotion. Social Philosophy and Policy, 13(1), 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. D. (Ed.). (2011). Western Intervention in the Balkans: The Strategic Use of Emotion in Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pronk, J., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2016). Factors Influencing Interventions on Behalf of Victims of Bullying: A Counterfactual Approach to the Social Cognitions of Outsiders and Defenders. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(2), 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Propp, V. (2010 [1968]). Morphology of the Folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. (2006). Inter-texual Relations: The Quarrel Over the Iraq War as a Conflict Between Narrative Types. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(4), 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudhahar, S., Franzosi, R., & Cristianini, N. (2011). Automating Quantitative Narrative Analysis of News Data. Paper Presented at the WAPA Conference, 2nd Workshop on Applications of Pattern Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (2006). Anger and the Struggle for Justice. In S. Clarke, P. Hoggett, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Emotion, Politics and Society (pp. 123–144). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toolan, M. J. (1988). Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugazio, G., Majdandžic, J., & Lamm, C. (2014). Are Empathy and Morality Linked? In H. L. Maibom (Ed.), Empathy and Morality (pp. 155–171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weizman, E. (2011). The Least of All Possible Evils: Humanitarian Violence from Arendt to Gaza. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2014). Discourses and Discourse Analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 341–354). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Parts of this chapter are based on the article “The “Hero-Protector Narrative”: Manufacturing Emotion al Consent for the Use of Force”, published by the authors in the journal Political Psychology, available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1111%2Fpops.12385. We thank the journal editors for their friendly permission to reuse some of the results presented in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sangar, E., Clément, M., Lindemann, T. (2018). Of Heroes and Cowards: A Computer-Based Analysis of Narratives Justifying the Use of Force. In: Clément, M., Sangar, E. (eds) Researching Emotions in International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics