Advertisement

Conflicting Boundaries and Roles: Impressions of Ethnographic Fieldwork in the French Banlieues

  • Luuk Slooter
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

Drawing on extensive ‘fieldwork’ in the Parisian suburb of La Courneuve, this chapter emphasizes the need for ethnographers to provide more details on, and justification of their methods in their publications. First, it discusses the challenge of defining and delineating the ‘field’ and suggests that ‘mental maps’ or ‘narrative cartographies’ are a valuable tool for exploring and decomposing the ‘field’. Second, it reflects on the positionality of the researcher. It shows how the ethnographer can easily become ‘the observed’ (rather than the observer) due to unexpected role ascriptions by informants. These role ascriptions should, however, not be seen as an obstacle to the ethnographic research but rather as part of the core data, revealing the dynamics and policing of boundaries between ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’.

References

  1. Body-Gendrot, Sophie, and Catherine Wihtol de Wenden. 2003. Police et Discriminations Raciales: Le Tabou Français. Paris: Les éditions de l’atelier.Google Scholar
  2. Bourgois, Philippe. 1995. In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boucher, Manuel. 2009. L’experience du ghetto. Stormy, Roger, Abdou et leur clan: rebelles et débrouillards. Deviance et Société 33 (2): 221–248.Google Scholar
  4. Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campos, Paul. 2015. Alice Goffman’s Implausible Ethnography. Chronicle of Higher Education 21. http://www.chronicle.com/article/Alice-Goffmans-Implausible-/232491.
  6. Candea, Matei. 2009. Arbitrary Locations: In Defence of the Bounded Field-site. In Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research, ed. Mark-Anthony Falzon, 25–45. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, Carolyn E., Tony E. Adams, and Arthur P. Bochner. 2011. Autoethnography: An Overview. Forum Qualitative Social Research 12 (1): Art. 10. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108.
  8. Falzon, Mark-Anthony. 2009. Introduction. Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. In Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research, ed. Mark-Anthony Falzon, 1–23. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Fassin, Didier. 2013. Enforcing Order: An Ethnography of Urban Policing. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ferguson, James. 1997. Paradoxes of Sovereignty and Independence: ‘Real’ and ‘Pseudo’ Nation-states and the Depoliticization of Poverty. In Siting Culture: The Shifting Anthropological Object, ed. Karen F. Olwig and Kirsten Hastrup, 123–141. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, Alice. 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gold, Raymond L. 1958. Roles in Sociological Field Observations. Social Forces 36 (3): 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gould, Peter, and Rodney White. 1993. Mental Maps. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, Stephen. 2010. Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  15. Greenhouse, Carol J. 2010. Introduction. In Ethnographies of Neoliberalism, ed. Carol J. Greenhouse, 1–10. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1997. Discipline and Practice: ‘The Field’ as Site, Method and Location in Anthropology. In Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, ed. Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson, 1–46. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gutsche, Robert E. 2014. News Place-Making: Applying ‘Mental Mapping’ to Explore the Journalistic Interpretive Community. Visual Communication 13 (4): 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography. Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hannerz, Ulf. 2003. Being There… and There… and There!: Reflections on Multi-Site Ethnography. Ethnography 4 (2): 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hart, Harm’t, Jan van Dijk, Martijn de Goede, Wim Jansen, and Joop Teunissen. 1998. Onderzoeksmethoden. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  21. Hastrup, Kirsten, and Karen F. Olwig. 1997. Introduction. In Siting Culture: The Shifting Anthropological Object, ed. Karen F. Olwig and Kirsten Hastrup, 1–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Jazouli, Adil. 1992. Les Années Banlieues. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  23. Lederach, John Paul. 1995. Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation across Cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lubet, Steven. 2015. Ethics on the Run. The New Rambler. http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run.
  25. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2013. Indicators +: A Proposal for Everyday Peace Indicators. Evaluation and Program Planning 36: 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Madden, Raymond. 2010. Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Malinowski, Bronisław. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Marcus, George E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohammed, Marwan, and Laurent Mucchielli. 2006. La police dans les « quartiers sensibles » : un profond malaise. In Quand les banlieues brûlent… Retour sur les émeutes de novembre 2005, ed. Laurent Mucchielli and Véronique Le Goaziou, 98–119. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  30. Nadai, Eva, and Christoph Maeder. 2005. Fuzzy Fields: Multi-sited Ethnography in Sociological Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6 (3): Art. 28. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503288.
  31. Olwig, Karen F. 1997. Cultural Sites. Sustaining a Home in a Deterritorialized World. In Siting Culture: The Shifting Anthropological Object, ed. Karen F. Olwig and Kirsten Hastrup, 17–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. O’Reilly, Karen. 2012. Ethnographic Methods. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Reinders, Leeke. 2011. Harde stad, zachte stad. De narratieve cartografie van het dagelijkse leven. Kunstlicht 32 (1/2): 52–63.Google Scholar
  34. Reinders, Leeke. 2013. Harde stad, zachte stad. Moderne architectuur en de antropologie van een naoorlogse wijk. PhD dissertation, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft.Google Scholar
  35. Richmond, Oliver P., Stefanie Kappler, and Annika Björkdahl. 2015. The ‘Field’ in the Age of Intervention: Power, Legitimacy, and Authority Versus the ‘Local’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rivayrand, Serge. 2006. L’Action de la Police Nationale dans la Lutte Contre les Violences Urbaines. Regards sur l’Actualité 319: 51–58.Google Scholar
  37. Schut, Michelle, Peter J.M. Nas, and Siri T. Hettige. 2012. Emotion in the Symbolic Spectrum of Colombo, Sri Lanka. In Cities Full of Symbols: A Theory of Urban Space and Culture, ed. Peter J.M. Nas, 27–54. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Slooter, Luuk. 2015. The Making of the Banlieue: An Ethnography of Space, Identity and Violence. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University and École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
  39. Van Maanen, John. 2011. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luuk Slooter
    • 1
  1. 1.UGlobe, the Utrecht Centre for Global ChallengesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations