Terror and Identity: The Case of Argentina and the Importance of the Different ‘Representations’ of the Past

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the ways in which mass violence destroys social ties through the traumatic effects of terror, transforming the identity of the survivors and their societies. Questioning the notion that the perpetrators are motivated by hatred or evil, or that they seek to eradicate population groups for ideological reasons alone, it examines the functionality and effectiveness of mass violence over time and attempts to determine why its effects are so enduring. Taking the Argentine state violence from 1976 to 1983 as an example, it examines the implications of different types of memory for processing the traumatic consequences of terror. To this end, it revisits Raphael Lemkin’s pioneering concept of genocide as the “destruction of the national identity of the oppressed group” in the light of contemporary developments in neuroscience, psychoanalysis, and social sciences.

Keywords

Genocide Memory Identity Collective identities Social fabric Argentina 

References

  1. Bermann, S., Lucila, E., Kordon, D., et al. (1994). Efectos psicosociales de la represión política: Sus secuelas en Alemania. InArgentina y Uruguay. Córdoba: Goethe-Institut.Google Scholar
  2. CINTRAS, EATIP, GTNM/RJ, & SERSOC. (2009). Daño transgeneracional: Consecuencias de la represión política en el Cono Sur. Santiago de Chile: Gráfica LOM.Google Scholar
  3. Danieli, Y. (1998). International handbook of multigenerational legacies of trauma. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, J. G. (2000). Consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  5. Feierstein, D. (2014). Genocide as social practice: Reorganizing society under the Nazis and Argentina’s military juntas. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1922). Beyond the pleasure principle (C. J. M. Hubback, Trans.) & (E. Jones, Ed.). London: International Psycho-Analytical Press.Google Scholar
  7. Furnari, R. (2002). Keywords glossary screen (2). Chicago: University of Chicago. http://csmt.uchicago.edu/glossary2004/screen2.htm. Accessed 10 June 2016.
  8. Kaës, R., & Puget, J. (1991). Violencia de estado y psicoanálisis. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.Google Scholar
  9. Kandel, E. (2006). In search of memory: The emergence of a new science of mind. New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Laborit, H. (1983). La colombe assassinée. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
  11. Laplanche, J., & Pontalis J. B. (1988). The language of psycho-analysis (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  12. Lemkin, R. (1944). Axis rule in occupied Europe. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  13. Piaget, J. (1974). La prise de conscience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  14. Rostica, J. (2013). Observatorio Latinoamericano 13: Dossier Violencia y Seguridad en Centroamérica, Instituto de Estudios de América Latina y el Caribe, Universidad de Buenos Aires. http://iealc.sociales.uba.ar/files/2011/06/Observatorio-13.-Seguridad-y-violencia.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  15. Rostica, J. (2015). Las dictaduras militares en Guatemala (1982–1985) y Argentina (1976–1983) en la lucha contra la subversión. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  16. Sherin, J. E., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2011). Post-traumatic stress disorder: The neurobiological impact of psychological trauma. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 13, 263–278.Google Scholar
  17. Terranova, J. (2004). El ignorante. Buenos Aires: Tantalia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero, Universidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations