Skip to main content

Towards a Scientific Collaborative Design Approach: The Construction of a Community Informatics Design Assistance System to Support Communities and Virtual Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Informatics Design Applied to Digital Social Systems

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 12))

  • 523 Accesses

Abstract

Collaborative design has become one of the main challenges in several fields of studies, especially social and communication sciences, physics and computer sciences and even biology, architecture and ecosystems of innovation. It is part of the future research program in humanities and digital social sciences. Designers want to create systems where several entities (organizations and individuals) could collaborate to society projects in an autonomous way, on site and in their sphere of respective work. Actually this social design process occurs within the collaborative network framework. Collaborative design seeks to allow collaborators to work in a more efficient way by realizing collaborative actions beyond cultural, disciplinary, geographical and temporal barriers. However, for the system to work, we must configure it in order to meet the needs of social requests and changes. According to Lu et al. (2007), few disciplines have addressed the collaborative design study rigorously, which remains a field of the occult science or black magic. These authors grant we should transform collaborative design in a real discipline, in other words, to take it from black magic practiced by very few people to a rigorous discipline understood by all (Lu et al. 2007). Researches on collaboration found a strong resistance from the determinist philosophical tradition followers, resistance also coming from some misunderstandings created by previous works. We were wondering, for example, how to evaluate the human collaboration as an acquired social dexterity if we cannot study it scientifically. In other words, if we cannot provide mathematical proof of the existence of collaboration, its uniqueness, its stability or convergence properties when collaborative design does not rely on any intellectual substance, in view of the low number of serious studies on collaboration sciences that have been led until here. In this case, how to build a collaborative design that allows to generate and share the knowledge? According to Wenger and Gervais, design does not rely on a simple communication activity:

Here, it is about unifying and coordinating the skills that exist in a practice constellation. The design challenge in organizations is not to find the form of skill that conditions all the others, but at the contrary, to coordinate multiple forms of skills in the organizational learning. (Wenger and Gervais 2005, p. 269)

The present chapter suggests an outline for the creation of the community informatics ecosystem’s design and suggests a few leads and recommendations. It also provides a methodological framework, even a multi-methodological one, to support virtual environments. In other words, it is about experiencing a community information systems design or to present the general architecture of a collaboration software, the “reference design for open collaboration”. The community informatics design assistance system (SADC) is essentially a framework presenting the adjustable design modalities according to the users’ needs. It is the starting point for virtual organizations and communities that wish to implement new collaboration solutions. As an adjustable socio-collaborative platform, the SADC covers both the community informatics design’s scientific bases, the design of virtual communities and the collaboration aspects. It links them in order to facilitate the information circulation and the access to knowledge and bring closer the users’ communities. To a lesser degree, the SADC is also a reference model, a conceptual framework defining a middle ground and a common terminology for communication and a platform prototype of open service, expandable and adaptable for the structuring and integration of all sorts of online activities, socio-technical systems, personalized portals and even all sorts of collaboration platforms like virtual communities or campuses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Reference architecture ”, Wikipedia, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_architecture>.

  2. 2.

    “Reference model”, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_model

References

  • Appelt, W., & Manbrey, P. (1999). Experiences with the BSCW shared workspace system as the backbone of a virtual learning environment for students. Proceedings of ED Media’99, Charlottesville, 1710–1715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, R. M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W. A. S., & Greenberg, S. (1995). Readings in human computer interaction: Toward the year 2000. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (2000a). Guided evolution of society: A systems view. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General systems theory, foundation, development, applications. New-York: G. Braziller, trad. française: (1973), Théorie générale des systèmes, Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Stewart, S. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London: Sage Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Budweg, M., Bock, G., & Weber, M. (2006). The Eifel plume-imaged with converted seismic waves. Geophysical Journal International, 166(2), 579–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos, L. M., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2005a). Collaborative networks: a new scientific discipline. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Netherlands, 16, 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos, L. M., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2005b). In L. M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, & A. Ortiz (Eds.), Collaborative networks and their breeding environments (Vol. 186, pp. 3–16). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., & Ollus, M. (2005a). Virtual organizations: Systems and practices. Boston: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., & Ollus, M. (2005b). ECOLEAD: A holistic approach to creation and management of dynamic virtual organizations. in.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Silveri, I., Afsarmanesh, H., & Oliveira, A. I. (2005c). Towards a framework for creation of dynamic virtual organizations. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos & H. Afsarmanesh (Eds.), Collaborative networks and their breeding environments (pp. 69–80). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1988). Information systems and systems thinking: Time to unite? International Journal of Information Management, 8, 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1974). Redesigning the future. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55. Massachusset Institute of technology. Summer 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, A. (2004). Design as a socio-cultural cognitive system, published in the proceeding of the International Design conference- Design 2004- Dubrovnik, May 18–21, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (1990). Capitalism and communication: Global culture and the economics of information. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. A. (1966). A design science, dans S. A. Gregory (dir.), The design method (pp. 323–330) Londres: Butter worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. Y., et al. (2010). Reference architecture for collaborative design. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, 5(1), 71–90. ISSN 1841-9836, E-ISSN 1841-9844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild-issue. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, 2e éd , Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S. C.-Y., Elmaraghy, W., Schuh, G., & Wilhelm, R. (2007). A scientific foundation of collaborative engineering. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 56(2), 605–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1992). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23. (incomplete).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, I., Velthausz, D., & Kriens, M. (2008). The living labs harmonization cube: Communicating living labs’ essentials. In eJOV Executive – The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, vol. 10, “Special Issue on Living Labs”, November 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning, H., et al. (2016). Cybermatics: Cyber–physical–social–thinking hyperspace based science and technology. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 504–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, J., & Feurstein, K. (2007). Living labs – a new multi-stakeholder approach to user integration. In Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Systems and Applications (I-ESA’07), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, K. S., & Duffy, A. H. B. (2003). Toward ontology of generic engineering design activities. Res En Design, 14, 200–223. doi:10.1007/s00163-003-0037-1. (incomplete).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decisions. New York: Harper & Row.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • TOGAF. (2009). TOGAF™ version 9 Enterprise edition: An introduction document no.: W094. Mumbai: The Open Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E., & Thomke, S. (2002). Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Bussiness Review, consulté le 28 novembre 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eijnatten, F. M. (2005). A chaordic view of collaborative networked organisations. January 2005. (incomplete).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., & Gervais, F. (2005). La théorie des communautés de pratique. Québec: Presses Université Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuge, H. (2009). Communities and emerging semantics in semantic link network: Discovery and learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 785–799. [87].

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuge, H. (2010). Interactive semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 174, 190–204. [88].

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuge, H. (2011). Semantic linking through spaces for cyber-physical-socio intelligence: Amethodology. Artificial Intelligence, 175, 988–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel, P., Felder, S., & Meier, M. (1999). Ageing of population and health care expenditure: A red herring? Health Economics, 8(6), 485–496.

    Google Scholar 

Webography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harvey, PL. (2017). Towards a Scientific Collaborative Design Approach: The Construction of a Community Informatics Design Assistance System to Support Communities and Virtual Organizations. In: Community Informatics Design Applied to Digital Social Systems. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65373-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65373-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65372-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65373-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics