A New Approach to Online Visual Analysis and Sharing of Archaeological Surveys and Image Collections

  • Ilya Zaslavsky
  • Margie M. Burton
  • Thomas E. Levy
Chapter
Part of the Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences book series (QMHSS)

Abstract

Sharing digital archaeological data via a web-based analytical interface has the potential to engage joint expertise of archaeologists as well as researchers from other disciplines who can explore imagery datasets online and share their findings. These tasks can now be accomplished with a new general-purpose survey data analysis tool called Survey Analysis via Visual Exploration (SuAVE). A test case is presented here with legacy data and new ceramic petrographic data from the large-scale excavations of Shiqmim, a Chalcolithic (ca. 4500–3600 BC) village and cemetery site, located in Israel’s northern Negev desert.

Keywords

Web-based analyses Exploratory data analysis Shiqmim Interactive visualization Cyber-Archaeology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

SuAVE development is supported by NSF award 1443082 “EAGER: Development of a Novel Online Visual Survey Data Analysis Tool and Assessment of its Capabilities to Enhance Learning of Quantitative Research Methods.” M. Burton thanks the Center for Cyber-Archaeology and Sustainability—Qualcomm Institute for providing travel funding for the ceramic petrographic study described in this chapter. M. Burton also thanks Dr. Patrick Sean Quinn at the University College London Institute of Archaeology for permitting access to laboratory equipment and microscopes as well as generous assistance with thin section preparation and interpretation. Part of this research project is funded by the UC Office of the President through a President’s Research Catalyst Award for At-Risk Cultural Heritage and the Digital Humanities (Grant ID Number CA-16-376911).

References

  1. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel. 2015. EarthCube Stakeholder Survey Data. Integrated Earth Data Applications (IEDA). doi:10.1594/IEDA/100535; Date Available: 2015-04-15; URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/IEDA/100535
  2. EAGER award “Development of a Novel Online Visual Survey Data Analysis Tool and Assessment of its Capabilities to Enhance Learning of Quantitative Research Methods” [ACI-1443082] 2017.Google Scholar
  3. Microsoft Silverlight PivotViewer. https://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/pivotviewer/. Accessed 9/5/2016.
  4. OpenLink HTML5 PivotViewer. https://github.com/openlink/html5pivotviewer. Accessed 9/5/2016.
  5. Taylor, S., and R. Noble. 2014. HTML5 PivotViewer: high-throughput visualization and querying of image data on the web. Bioinformatics 30 (18): 2691–2692. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology.Google Scholar
  7. Ragin, C.C., and B. Rihoux. 2004. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): State of the art and prospects. Qualitative Methods 2 (2): 3–13.Google Scholar
  8. Arnold, Taylor, and Lauren Tilton. 2015. Humanities data in R: exploring networks, geospatial data, images, and text. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. S. V. Chesnokov. 1980. Determinacy analysis of social-economic data, Sociological Studies, #3, 179–189 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  10. Luelsdorff, P.A., and S.V. Chesnokov. 1996. Determinacy form as the essence of language. Prague Linguistic Circle Papers 2: 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. OpenCPU. https://www.opencpu.org/. Accessed 10/22/2016.
  12. Openseadragon. https://github.com/openseadragon. Accessed 10/21/2016.
  13. National Opinion Research Center. The General Social Survey. http://gss.norc.org/. Accessed 9/5/2016.
  14. Edmunds, P of Moorea Coral Reef LTER. 2012. MCR LTER: Coral Reef: Computer Vision: Moorea Labeled Corals. knb-lter-mcr.5006.2.Google Scholar
  15. British Geological Survey. JISC-funded project: GB3D type fossils online. http://www.bgs.ac.uk/collections/jiscGB3DTypeFossils.html. Accessed 9/5/2016.
  16. Manovich, Lev. “Data Science and Digital Art History.” International Journal for Digital Art History, no. 1 (2015). https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/dah/article/view/21631.
  17. Schmidt, B., B. Gemeinholzer, and A. Treloar. 2016. Open data in global environmental research: the Belmont Forum’s Open Data Survey. PLOS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146695.
  18. Levantine and Cyber-Archaeology Lab. Shiqmim – The Beersheva Valley Chiefdom. University of California, San Diego. Accessed 9/19/2016. http://levlab.ucsd.edu/projects/shiqmim/.
  19. SuAVE|Survey Analysis via Visual Exploration. Accessed September 19, 2016. http://suave.sdsc.edu/.
  20. Levy, T.E. (editor). 1987. Shiqmim I: Studies Concerning Chalcolithic Societies in the Northern Negev Desert, Israel (1982–1984). BAR International Series 356, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Levy, T.E., D. Alon, C. Grigson, A. Holl, P. Goldberg, Y. Rowan, and P. Smith. 1991. Subterranean Negev settlement. National Geographic Research and Exploration 7: 394–413.Google Scholar
  22. Burton, M. and T.E. Levy 2001. The Chalcolithic radiocarbon record and its use in Southern Levantine archaeology. Radiocarbon 43 (2): 1–24. Proceedings of the 17th International 14C Conference, eds. I. Carmi and E. Boaretto.Google Scholar
  23. Levy, T.E. 1992. Transhumance, subsistence, and social evolution in the northern Negev desert. In Pastoralism in the Levant: archaeological material in anthropological perspective, ed. A. Khazanov and O. Bar-Yosef. Madison, Wisconsin: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2007. Journey to the copper age – archaeology in the Holy Land. San Diego: San Diego Museum of Man.Google Scholar
  25. Quinn, P.S., D. Rout, L. Stringer, T. Alexander, A. Armstrong, and S. Olmstead. 2011. Petrodatabase: an on-line database for thin section ceramic petrography. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 2491–2496. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.04.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Burton, M.M., and T.E. Levy. 2012. Chalcolithic social organization reconsidered: excavations at the Abu Hof Village, northern Negev, Israel. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society 42: 137–192.Google Scholar
  27. Levy, T.E., M.M. Burton, and Y.M. Rowan. 2006. Chalcolithic hamlet excavations near Shiqmim, Negev desert, Israel. Journal of Field Archaeology 31 (1): 41–60.Google Scholar
  28. Levy, T.E., D. Alon, Y. Rowan, E.C.M. van den Brink, C. Grigson, A. Holl, P. Smith, P. Goldberg, A.J. Witten, E. Kansa, J. Moreno, Y. Yekuteili, N. Porat, J. Golden, L. Dawson, and M. Kersel. 1997. Egyptian-Canaanite Interaction at Nahal Tillah, Israel (c. 4500–3000 B.C.E.): An Interim Report on the 1994–1995 Excavations. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 307: 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilya Zaslavsky
    • 1
  • Margie M. Burton
    • 2
  • Thomas E. Levy
    • 2
  1. 1.Spatial Information Systems Laboratory, San Diego Supercomputer CenterUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Anthropology and Center for Cyber-Archaeology and Sustainability—Qualcomm InstituteUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations