Data Acquisition for 3D Geometric Recording: State of the Art and Recent Innovations

  • Andreas GeorgopoulosEmail author
  • Elisavet Konstantina Stathopoulou
Part of the Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences book series (QMHSS)


Digitization of Cultural Heritage assets and sites is a broad term that includes quantitative as well as qualitative data acquisition. Towards a holistic, complete documentation, as outlined by the Venice Charter (1964), capturing the geometry of an object is considered to be one of the first and most essential steps. Within the photogrammetric, the computer vision and the robotics communities, various techniques for 2D, 3D, even 4D data acquisition and digitization have been developed during the past years. Cultural heritage assets are still a challenging object due to the complexity of their shape, the variety of their types, the high requirements of accuracy, and the heterogeneity of the end-users. This chapter focuses on the state of the art of the geometric 3D data acquisition methods, classifying them generally into passive and active. For each category, the available sensors and their working principles are presented and criticized, followed by acquisition network design suggestions and implementation guidelines. In this way, the reader is presented with their merits and disadvantages in order to be able to decide for their correct implementation.


3D geometric recording Scanning Depth sensors Photogrammetry Image-based 3D reconstruction 


  1. Ackermann, Jens, Michael, Goesele, and others. 2015. Survey of photometric stereo techniques. Boston, MA: Now Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, Sameer, Noah, Snavely, Ian, Simon, Steven M., Seitz, and Richard, Szeliski. 2009. Building rome in a day. In 2009 IEEE 12th international conference on computer vision, 72–79.Google Scholar
  3. Alahi, Alexandre, Raphael, Ortiz, and Pierre, Vandergheynst. 2012. Freak: Fast retina keypoint. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 510–517.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Eike Falk, Leigh McLoughlin, Fotis Liarokapis, Christopher Peters, Panagiotis Petridis, and Sara De Freitas. 2010. Developing serious games for cultural heritage: a state-of-the-art review. Virtual Reality 14 (4): 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angelopoulou, Elli, and James P. Williams. 1999. Photometric surface analysis in a tri-luminal environment. In The proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on computer vision, 442–449.Google Scholar
  6. Audet, Samuel, and Masatoshi, Okutomi. 2009. A user-friendly method to geometrically calibrate projector-camera systems. In IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, 47–54.Google Scholar
  7. Barsanti, S., Gonizzi F. Remondino, and D. Visintini. 2013. 3D surveying and modelling of archaeological sites-some critical issues. ISPRS photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Strasbourg, France, Sept. 2–6.Google Scholar
  8. Basri, Ronen, David Jacobs, and Ira Kemelmacher. 2007. Photometric stereo with general, unknown lighting. International Journal of Computer Vision 72 (3): 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bastonero, Paola, Elisabetta Donadio, Filiberto Chiabrando, and A. Spano. 2014. Fusion of 3D models derived from TLS and image-based techniques for CH enhanced documentation. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (Copernicus GmbH) 2 (5): 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bay, Herbert, Tinne, Tuytelaars, and Luc, Van Gool. 2006. Surf: speeded up robust features. In European conference on computer vision, 404–417.Google Scholar
  11. Besl, Paul J., and Neil D. McKay. 1992. Method for registration of 3-D shapes. Robotics-DL Tentative: 586–606.Google Scholar
  12. Böhler, Wolfgang, and Guido, Heinz. 1999. Documentation, surveying, photogrammetry. In XVII CIPA symposium, Recife, Olinda. Google Scholar
  13. Bostanci, Erkan, Nadia Kanwal, and Adrian F. Clark. 2015. Augmented reality applications for cultural heritage using Kinect. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences 5 (1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, Xiaobo, Juntong Xi, Ye Jin, and Jin Sun. 2009. Accurate calibration for a camera--projector measurement system based on structured light projection. Optics and Lasers in Engineering (Elsevier) 47 (3): 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamanti, Eleni, Andreas Georgopoulos, and Fotini Vlachaki. 2013. Geometric documentation of underwater archaeological sites. Geoinformatics FCE CTU 11: 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drareni, Jamil, Sebastien Roy, and Peter Sturm. 2012. Methods for geometrical video projector calibration. Machine Vision and Applications 23 (1): 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Endres, Felix, Jürgen Hess, Jürgen Sturm, Daniel Cremers, and Wolfram Burgard. 2014. 3-D mapping with an RGB-D camera. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 30 (1): 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esteban, Carlos Hernandez, George Vogiatzis, and Roberto Cipolla. 2008. Multiview photometric stereo. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30 (3): 548–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evgenikou, Vasiliki, and Andreas Georgopoulos. 2015. Investigating 3d reconstruction methods for small artifacts. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40 (5): 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Faugeras, Olivier D. 1992. What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig? In European conference on computer vision, 563–578.Google Scholar
  21. Fioraio, Nicola, and Kurt, Konolige. 2011. Realtime visual and point cloud slam. In Proceedings of the RGB-D workshop on advanced reasoning with depth cameras at robotics: science and systems conference (RSS). Google Scholar
  22. Foix, Sergi, Guillem Alenya, and Carme Torras. 2011. Lock-in time-of-flight (ToF) cameras: a survey. IEEE Sensors Journal 11 (9): 1917–1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Förstner, Wolfgang, and Eberhard, Gülch. 1987. A fast operator for detection and precise location of distinct points, corners and centres of circular features. In Proceedings of ISPRS intercommission conference on fast processing of photogrammetric data, 281–305.Google Scholar
  24. Furukawa, Yasutaka, and Jean Ponce. 2010. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32 (8): 1362–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Furukawa, Yasutaka, Brian, Curless, Steven M. Seitz, and Richard, Szeliski. 2010. Towards internet-scale multi-view stereo. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 1434–1441.Google Scholar
  26. Georgopoulos, Andreas, and others. 2004. 3D reconstruction and rendering for a virtual visit (Citeseer).Google Scholar
  27. Gonzalez-Jorge, H., B. Riveiro, E. Vazquez-Fernandez, J. Martínez-Sánchez, and P. Arias. 2013. Metrological evaluation of microsoft kinect and asus xtion sensors. Measurement 46 (6): 1800–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hameeuw, Hendrik, and Geert Willems. 2011. New visualization techniques for cuneiform texts and sealings. Akkadica (Fondation Assyriologique Georges Dossin) 132: 163–178.Google Scholar
  29. Hammer, Oyvind, Stefan Bengtson, Tom Malzbender, and Dan Gelb. 2002. Imaging fossils using reflectance transformation and interactive manipulation of virtual light sources. Palaeontologia Electronica 5 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
  30. Han, Jungong, Ling Shao, Dong Xu, and Jamie Shotton. 2013. Enhanced computer vision with microsoft kinect sensor: a review. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 43 (5): 1318–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, Chris, and Mike, Stephens. 1988. A combined corner and edge detector. In Alvey vision conference, 50.Google Scholar
  32. Hartley, Richard I., 1993. Euclidean reconstruction from uncalibrated views. In Joint European-US workshop on applications of invariance in computer vision, 235–256.Google Scholar
  33. Hartley, Richard, and Andrew Zisserman. 2003. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Hartley, Richard, Rajiv, Gupta, and Tom, Chang. 1992. Stereo from uncalibrated cameras. In Proceedings CVPR’92 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 761–764.Google Scholar
  35. Henry, Peter, Michael, Krainin, Evan, Herbst, Xiaofeng, Ren, and Dieter, Fox. 2010. RGB-D mapping: using depth cameras for dense 3D modeling of indoor environments. In In the 12th international symposium on experimental robotics (ISER). Google Scholar
  36. Hernandez, C., Vogiatzis, G. 2010. Shape from Photographs: A Multi-view Stereo Pipeline. Computer Vision: Detection, Recognition and Reconstruction, Cipolla, Battiato, Farinella (Eds.), 2010 Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Hertzmann, Aaron, and Steven M. Seitz. 2005. Example-based photometric stereo: Shape reconstruction with general, varying brdfs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27 (8): 1254–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hirschmuller, Heiko. 2005. Accurate and efficient stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual information. In IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’05), 807–814.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2008. Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30 (2): 328–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hyyppä, J. 2011. State of the art in laser scanning. Photogrammetric Week 2011 (Germany, Wichmann), 203–216.Google Scholar
  41. Iwahori, Yuji, R. J. Woodham, and Ardeshir, Bagheri. 1995. Principal components analysis and neural network implementation of photometric stereo. In Proceedings of the workshop on physics-based modeling in computer vision, 117.Google Scholar
  42. Izadi, Shahram, David, Kim, Otmar, Hilliges, David, Molyneaux, Richard, Newcombe, Pushmeet, Kohli, Jamie, Shotton, et al. 2011. KinectFusion: real-time 3D reconstruction and interaction using a moving depth camera. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, 559–568.Google Scholar
  43. Kerl, Christian, Jürgen, Sturm, and Daniel, Cremers. 2013. Dense visual SLAM for RGB-D cameras. In IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2100–2106.Google Scholar
  44. Khoshelham, Kourosh, and Sander Oude Elberink. 2012. Accuracy and resolution of kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors 12 (2): 1437–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kimura, Makoto, Masaaki, Mochimaru, and Takeo, Kanade. 2007. Projector calibration using arbitrary planes and calibrated camera. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 1–2.Google Scholar
  46. Köhler, Johannes, Tobias, Nöll, Gerd, Reis, and Didier, Stricker. 2013. A full-spherical device for simultaneous geometry and reflectance acquisition. In IEEE workshop on applications of computer vision (WACV), 355–362.Google Scholar
  47. Kontogianni, G., and A. Georgopoulos. 2015. Exploiting textured 3D models for developing serious games. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40 (5): 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kotoula, Lydia, and Andreas, Georgopoulos. 2015. Digital documentation for the restoration of the Anargyros Mansion. Digital Heritage, 731–734.Google Scholar
  49. Laamarti, Fedwa, Mohamad Eid, and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2014. An overview of serious games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology: 11.Google Scholar
  50. Lee, Kyoung Mu, and C.-C. Jay Kuo. 1993. Surface reconstruction from photometric stereo images. JOSA A (Optical Society of America) 10 (5): 855–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leonard, John J., and Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte. 1991. Mobile robot localization by tracking geometric beacons. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 7 (3): 376–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Letellier, Robin, and C. Gray. 2002. Bridging the gap between the information user and the information provider. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 34 (5/C7): 13–18.Google Scholar
  53. Lowe, David G. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In The proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on computer vision, 1150–1157.Google Scholar
  54. ———. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60 (2): 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Luhmann, Thomas. 2010. Close range photogrammetry for industrial applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65 (6): 558–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Makantasis, Konstantinos, Anastasios, Doulamis, Nikolaos, Doulamis, Marinos, Ioannides, and Nikolaos, Matsatsinis. 2014. Content-based filtering for fast 3D reconstruction from unstructured web-based image data. In Euro-mediterranean conference, 91–101.Google Scholar
  57. Malzbender, Thomas, Bennett, Wilburn, Dan, Gelb, and Bill, Ambrisco. 2006. Surface enhancement using real-time photometric stereo and reflectance transformation. In Proceedings of the European symposium on rendering techniques (Citeseer).Google Scholar
  58. McGlone, J. Chris. 2013. Manual of photogrammetry. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.Google Scholar
  59. Menna, F., E. Nocerino, F. Remondino, M. Dellepiane, M. Callieri, and R. Scopigno. 2016. 3D digitisation of a heritage masterpiece – a critical analysis. In ISPRS-international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 675–683.Google Scholar
  60. Moravec, Hans P. 1980. Obstacle avoidance and navigation in the real world by a seeing robot rover. Technical report, DTIC Document.Google Scholar
  61. Moreno, Daniel, and Gabriel, Taubin. 2012. Simple, accurate, and robust projector-camera calibration. In Second international conference on 3D imaging, modeling, processing, visualization and transmission, 464–471.Google Scholar
  62. Mortara, Michela, Chiara Eva Catalano, Francesco Bellotti, Giusy Fiucci, Minica Houry-Panchetti, and Panagiotis Petridis. 2014. Learning cultural heritage by serious games. Journal of Cultural Heritage 15 (3): 318–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mudge, Mark, Jean-Pierre, Voutaz, Carla, Schroer, and Marlin, Lum. 2005. Reflection transformation imaging and virtual representations of coins from the hospice of the grand St. Bernard. In VAST’05 proceedings of the 6th international conference on virtual reality, archaeology and intelligent cultural heritage, 29–39Google Scholar
  64. Nicolae, C., E. Nocerino, F. Menna, and F. Remondino. 2014. Photogrammetry applied to problematic artefacts. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40 (5): 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nocerino, Erica, Fabio Menna, and Fabio Remondino. 2014. Accuracy of typical photogrammetric networks in cultural heritage 3D modeling projects. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40 (5): 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Padfield, Joseph, David Saunders, and Tom Malzbender. 2005. Polynomial texture mapping: a new tool for examining the surface of paintings. ICOM Committee for Conservation 1: 504–510.Google Scholar
  67. Pappa, P., and G. Kottikas. 2000. The use of digital orthophotos in geometric documentation of monumets. Master’s thesis. National Technical University of Athens.Google Scholar
  68. Parkinson, Bradford W. 1996. Progress in astronautics and aeronautics: global positioning system: theory and applications. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  69. Pevar, Andrew, Lieven, Verswyvel, Stam, Georgoulis, Nico, Cornelis, Marc, Proesmans, and Luc, Van Gool. 2015. Real-time photometric stereo. In Proceedings of the 55th photogrammetric week, 185–206.Google Scholar
  70. Pollefeys, Marc, and Luc Van Gool. 1997. A stratified approach to metric self-calibration. In Proceedings of IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 407–412.Google Scholar
  71. Pollefeys, Marc, Reinhard Koch, and Luc Van Gool. 1999. Self-calibration and metric reconstruction inspite of varying and unknown intrinsic camera parameters. International Journal of Computer Vision 32 (1): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pollefeys, Marc, David Nister, J.-M. Frahm, Amir Akbarzadeh, Philippos Mordohai, Brian Clipp, Chris Engels, et al. 2008. Detailed real-time urban 3d reconstruction from video. International Journal of Computer Vision 78 (2–3): 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Prasad, Ramjee, and Marina Ruggieri. 2005. Applied satellite navigation-using GPS, GALILEO and augmentation systems. Boston: Artech House.Google Scholar
  74. Remondino, Fabio. 2011. Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sensing (Molecular Diversity Preservation International) 3 (6): 1104–1138.Google Scholar
  75. Remondino, Fabio, and Clive Fraser. 2006. Digital camera calibration methods: considerations and comparisons. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36 (5): 266–272.Google Scholar
  76. Remondino, Fabio, and Alessandro Rizzi. 2010. Reality-based 3D documentation of natural and cultural heritage sites—techniques, problems, and examples. Applied Geomatics 2 (3): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Repko, Jason, and Marc, Pollefeys. 2005. 3D models from extended uncalibrated video sequences: addressing key-frame selection and projective drift. In Fifth international conference on 3-D digital imaging and modeling (3DIM’05), 150–157.Google Scholar
  78. Richards-Rissetto, Heather, Fabio, Remondino, Giorgio, Agugiaro, Jennifer, von Schwerin, Jim, Robertsson, and Gabrio, Girardi. 2012. Kinect and 3D GIS in archaeology. In 18th international conference on virtual systems and multimedia (VSMM), 331–337.Google Scholar
  79. Rosten, Edward, and Tom, Drummond. 2006. Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. In European conference on computer vision, 430–443.Google Scholar
  80. Rothermel, Mathias, Konrad, Wenzel, Dieter, Fritsch, and Norbert, Haala. 2012. SURE: Photogrammetric surface reconstruction from imagery. In Proceedings LC3D Workshop, Berlin. Google Scholar
  81. Sadlo, Filip, Tim, Weyrich, Ronald, Peikert, and Markus, Gross. 2005. A practical structured light acquisition system for point-based geometry and texture. In Proceedings eurographics/IEEE VGTC symposium point-based graphics, 89–145.Google Scholar
  82. Santagati, Cettina, Laura, Inzerillo, and Francesco, Di Paola. 2013. Image-based modeling techniques for architectural heritage 3D digitalization: limits and potentialities. In International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, XL-5 W 2, 555–560.Google Scholar
  83. Sarbolandi, Hamed, Damien Lefloch, and Andreas Kolb. 2015. Kinect range sensing: Structured-light versus Time-of-Flight Kinect. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 139: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shan, Jie, and Charles K. Toth. 2008. Topographic laser ranging and scanning: principles and processing. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smisek, Jan, Michal Jancosek, and Tomas Pajdla. 2013. 3D with Kinect. In Consumer depth cameras for computer vision, 3–25. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith, Randall, Matthew Self, and Peter Cheeseman. 1990. Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics. In Autonomous robot vehicles, 167–193. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stathopoulou, E.K., A. Valanis, J.L. Lerma, and A. Georgopoulos. 2011. High and low resolution textured models of complex architectural surfaces. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 38 (5).Google Scholar
  88. Stathopoulou, E.K., A. Georgopoulos, G. Panagiotopoulos, and D. Kaliampakos. 2015. Crowdsourcing lost cultural heritage. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2 (5): 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Strecha, Christoph, Tinne, Tuytelaars, and Luc, Van Gool. 2003. Dense matching of multiple wide-baseline views. In Proceedings of ninth IEEE international conference on computer vision, 1194–1201.Google Scholar
  90. Szeliski, Richard. 2010. Computer vision: algorithms and applications. New York: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  91. Tola, Engin, Vincent Lepetit, and Pascal Fua. 2010. Daisy: an efficient dense descriptor applied to wide-baseline stereo. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32 (5): 815–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tryfona, M. S., and A. Georgopoulos. 2016. 3D image based geometric documentation of the tower of the winds. In ISPRS-International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 969–975.Google Scholar
  93. Verhoeven, Geert. 2016. Basics of photography for cultural heritage imaging. In 3D recording, documentation and management of cultural heritage, ed. Efstratios Stylianidis and Fabio Remondino, 127–251. Dunbeath: Whittles Publishing.Google Scholar
  94. Vincent, Matthew L., Mariano Flores Gutierrez, Chance Coughenour, Victor Manuel, Lopez-Menchero Bendicho, Fabio Remondino, and Dieter Fritsch. 2015. Crowd-sourcing the 3D digital reconstructions of lost cultural heritage. Digital Heritage: 171–172.Google Scholar
  95. Vosselman, George, and Hans-Gerd Maas. 2010. Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning. Dunbeath: Whittles Publishing.Google Scholar
  96. Waldhäusl, Peter, and C.L. Ogleby. 1994. 3 × 3 rules for simple photogrammetric documentation of architecture. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 30: 426–429.Google Scholar
  97. Watteeuw, Lieve, Bruno, Vandermeulen, Jan Van, der Stock, Pierre, Delsaerdt, Stefan, Gradmann, Frederik, Truyen, Marc, Proesmans, Wim, Moreau, and Luc, Van Gool. 2013. Imaging characteristics of graphic materials with the minidome (RICH). In Paper conservation decisions and compromise, 140–141.Google Scholar
  98. Wehr, Aloysius, and Uwe Lohr. 1999. Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 54 (2): 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wenzel, K., M. Rothermel, D. Fritsch, and N. Haala. 2013. Image acquisition and model selection for multi-view stereo. In International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol 5, W1.Google Scholar
  100. Westoby, M.J., J. Brasington, N.F. Glasser, M.J. Hambrey, and J.M. Reynolds. 2012. ‘Structure-from-Motion’photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179: 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Woodham, Robert J. 1980. Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images. Optical Engineering 19 (1): 191139–191139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yastikli, Naci. 2007. Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8 (4): 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zhang, Zhengyou. 2012. Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect. IEEE Multimedia 19 (2): 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhang, Song, and Peisen S. Huang. 2006. Novel method for structured light system calibration. Optical Engineering 45 (8): 83601–83601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Georgopoulos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elisavet Konstantina Stathopoulou
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Laboratory of PhotogrammetryNational Technical University of AthensZografouGreece

Personalised recommendations