Systematic Review on Work Related Symptoms and Support in Prostate Cancer Survivorship Quality Assessment of Studies

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
  • Raj Persad
Chapter

Abstract

Moher D. et al. [1], provides a useful list of questions in order to ascertain the ‘quality,’ of the study involved (Table  79.3). Five studies were of ‘C’ quality, 18 were of ‘A’ quality, 21 were of ‘B’ quality using their criteria [1]. Qualitative studies were assessed according to [2].

References

  1. 1.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Online). 2009;339:332–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frew G, Dashfield E. Testing care pathways for prostate cancer survivors. Nurs Times. 2012;108:30–1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCammon KA, Kolm P, Main B, Schellhammer PF. Comparative quality-of-life analysis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 1999;54:509–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
    • 1
  • Raj Persad
    • 2
  1. 1.The Royal Free Hospital and UCLLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.North Bristol NHS TrustBristolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations