Systematic Review: Prostate Cancer Survivorship and Psychosexual Care

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
  • Raj Persad
Chapter

Abstract

As a result of the above findings, a systematic review relating to literature on survivorship programmes for men with prostate cancer and psychosexual concerns was conducted. The search strategy aimed to identify all references related to prostate cancer survivorship programme components AND survivorship AND psychosexual concerns. The selection criteria specified papers must be related to primary research only. All secondary research apart from published systematic reviews or meta-analyses, were excluded. Search terms used were as follows: (Prostate cancer OR prostate neoplasms) AND (survivorship OR survivor*) OR (psychosexual impairment or sexual dysfunction or erectile dysfunction) AND (comorbidity or quality of life) (Fig. 87.1). The following databases were screened from 1984 to March 2014: CINAHL and MEDLINE (NHS Evidence), Cochrane, AMed, BNI, EMBASE, Health Business Elite, HMIC, PschINFO. In addition, searches using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords were conducted using Cochrane databases. Primary research only was included in the systematic review. Two UK-based experts in survivorship care were consulted to identify any additional studies.

References

  1. 1.
    Forbat L, White I, Marshall-Lucette S, Kelly D. Discussing the sexual consequences of treatment in radiotherapy and urology consultations with couples affected by prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2012;109:98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Online). 2009;339:332–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    French S, Swain J. Changing disability research: participating and emancipatory research with disabled people. Physiotherapy. 1997;83:26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR. Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104:2689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muller-Mattheis V, Schulz C, Schmelzer R, Mortsiefer A, Rotthoff T, Albers P, Karger A. Evaluation of a new course on teaching of erectile dysfunction following pelvic surgery in men with prostate or bladder cancer in undergraduate medical education. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:124.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fereday J. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naccarato A, Reis L, Mendonca G, Denardi F. Post radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction rehabilitation is couple dependent: a missing piece in the puzzle. Urology. 2013;1:S184.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Naccarato AMEP, Souto SC, Moreira M, Heckler P, Ferreira U, Souza EAP, Denardi F. Effects of phosphodiesterase inhibitors on erectile function and performance, and impacts of psychotherapy on the quality of life of patients submitted to radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2014;11:244.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Namiki S, Ishidoya S, Ito A, Arai Y. The impact of sexual desire on sexual health related quality of life following radical prostatectomy: a 5-year follow up study in Japan. Eur Urol Suppl. 2012;11(1):e671–e671a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neese LE, Schover LR, Klein EA, Zippe C, Kupelian PA. Finding help for sexual problems after prostate cancer treatment: a phone survey of men’s and women’s perspectives. Psychooncology. 2003;12:463–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nelson C, Kenowitz J, Pessin H, Lacey S, Mulhall J. Acceptance and commitment therapy for adherence to an erectile rehabilitation program after radical prostatectomy: preliminary results from a randomized control trial. Psychooncology. 2013;22:34.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nelson CJ, Kenowitz J. Communication and intimacy-enhancing interventions for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners. J Sex Med. 2013;10:127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP, Roth AJ. The association between erectile dysfunction and depressive symptoms in men treated for prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2011;8:560–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, Hussain M, Pienta KJ, Smith DC, Kershaw T. Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer. 2007;110:2809–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bober SL, Sanchez Varela V. Sexuality in adult cancer survivors: challenges and intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3712–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Brien R, Rose P, Campbell C, Weller D, Neal RD, Wilkinson C, McIntosh H, Watson E. “I wish I’d told them”: a qualitative study examining the unmet psychosexual needs of prostate cancer patients during follow-up after treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:200–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    O’Brien R, Rose PW, Campbell C, Weller D, Neal RD, Wilkinson C, Watson EK. Experiences of follow-up after treatment in patients with prostate cancer: a qualitative study. BJU Int. 2010;106:998–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Shaughnessy PT, Laws TA, Pinnock C, Moul JW, Esterman A. Differences in self-reported outcomes of open prostatectomy patients and robotic prostatectomy patients in an international web-based survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:775–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parker GB, Arvela O, Braye S, Edwards M, French P, Leung A, Parsons J, Smiley M. Letter: the economy, social integration and utilization of health services. Med J Aust. 1974;2:464.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parker PA, Pettaway CA, Babaian RJ, Pisters LL, Miles B, Fortier A, Wei Q, Carr DD, Cohen L. The effects of a presurgical stress management intervention for men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3169–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pavlovich CP, Levinson AW, Su LM, Mettee LZ, Feng Z, Bivalacqua TJ, Trock BJ. Nightly vs on-demand sildenafil for penile rehabilitation after minimally invasive nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a randomized double-blind trial with placebo. BJU Int. 2013;112:844–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peltier A, van Velthoven R, Roumeguere T. Current management of erectile dysfunction after cancer treatment. Curr Opin Oncol. 2009;21:303–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
    • 1
  • Raj Persad
    • 2
  1. 1.The Royal Free Hospital and UCLLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.North Bristol NHS TrustBristolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations