Advertisement

Work Related Symptoms, Support and Cost Effectiveness

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
  • Raj Persad
Chapter

Abstract

Deterioration of physical symptoms occurs more frequently at work [1, 2]. This was a qualitative study and quality assessed according to [3]. This study further contributed to understanding of the topic. An appropriate method was chosen with a literature review present. This study also contributes to development of knowledge of this subject. The sample was appropriate, with a clear description of data collection which was appropriately managed. Validity criteria were present. The analysis was clearly described with adequate discussion. Findings were confirmed in the study, excerpts were transcribed. There was appropriate discussion including an alternative explanation and results are applicable to other areas of research.

References

  1. 1.
    Taskila T, de Boer AG, van Dijk FJ, Verbeek JH. Fatigue and its correlates in cancer patients who had returned to work—a cohort study. Psychooncology. 2011;20(11):1236–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frew G, Dashfield E. Testing care pathways for prostate cancer survivors. Nurs Times. 2012;108:30–1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:6–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gudbergsson SB, Fossa SD, Dahl AA. A study of work changes due to cancer in tumor-free primary-treated cancer patients. A NOCWO study. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:1163–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCammon KA, Kolm P, Main B, Schellhammer PF. Comparative quality-of-life analysis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 1999;54:509–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Online). 2009;339:332–6.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snyder CW, Biggio JR, Brinson P, Barnes LA, Bartle DT, Georgeson KE, Muensterer OJ. Effects of multidisciplinary prenatal care and delivery mode on gastroschisis outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(1):86–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhindi B, Mamdani M, Kulkarni GS, Finelli A, Hamiton RJ, Trachtenberg J, Zlotta AR, Toi A, Evans A, Van Der Kwast TH, Fleshner NE. Prostate biopsy trends in relation to U.S. Preventative Task for recommendations against routine PSA-based screening: a time-series analysis. Eur Urol Suppl. 2014;13(1):e852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meade CD, Calvo A, Rivera MA, Baer RD. Focus groups in the design of prostate cancer screening information for Hispanic farmworkers and African American men. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003;30:967–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Megas G, Papadopoulos G, Stathouros G, Moschonas D, Gkialas I, Ntoumas K. Comparison of efficacy and satisfaction profile, between penile prosthesis implantation and oral PDE5 inhibitor Tadalafil therapy, in men with nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction. BJU Int. 2013;112:E169–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller DC, Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Montie JE, Pimentel H, Sandler HM, McLaughlin WP, Wei JT. Long-term outcomes among localized prostate cancer survivors: health-related quality-of-life changes after radical prostatectomy, external radiation, and brachytherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2772–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller DC, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Montie JE, Pimentel H, Sandler HM, McLaughlin PW, Sanda MG. Use of medications or devices for erectile dysfunction among long-term prostate cancer treatment survivors: potential influence of sexual motivation and/or indifference. Urology. 2006;68:166–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
    • 1
  • Raj Persad
    • 2
  1. 1.The Royal Free Hospital and UCLLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.North Bristol NHS TrustBristolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations