Advertisement

Assessment Tools for Psychosexual Concerns in Patients Post-surgery for Prostate Cancer

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
  • Raj Persad
Chapter

Abstract

Previously, there has been a lack of erectile dysfunction assessment tools [1]. However, several psychometrically valid screening measures have been developed. This is important to address in a cohort where there maybe several significant issues present.

References

  1. 1.
    Lehmann K, Eichlisberger R, Gasser TC. Lack of diagnostic tools to prove erectile dysfunction: consequences for reimbursement? J Urol. 2000;163:91–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Brook RH. The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. Med Care. 1998;36:1002–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2000;56:899–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krahn M, Ritvo P, Irvine J, Tomlinson G, Bezjak A, Trachtenberg J, Naglie G. Construction of the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS): a multiattribute health state classification system for prostate cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:920–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pen BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11:319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel JM, Sundararajan V. Practice of epidemiology: updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:676–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanchia S. Goonewardene
    • 1
  • Raj Persad
    • 2
  1. 1.The Royal Free Hospital and UCLLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.North Bristol NHS TrustBristolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations