Conclusion

Chapter
Part of the Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty book series (CRSTRU)

Abstract

This chapter summarises the findings presented in the book, using them to address the research questions presented in Chap.  1: (1) how do individuals imagine the future of their society? (2) Do individuals’ imaginings of the long-term future interact with or impact upon the ways in which they relate to the short-term, biographical future? And (3) are the ways in which individuals relate to the long-term future compatible with popular theoretical accounts of the contemporary future horizon? The implications that these finding may have for both the sociology of risk and uncertainty and broader research considering environmental issues and pro-environmental behaviour are considered. Finally, the book concludes by contending that the long-term, societal future is of both relevance and concern for individuals in their everyday lives.

Keywords

Future thinking Risk and uncertainty Long-term thinking Future imaginaries 

References

  1. Anderson, M., Bechhofer, F., McGrone, D., Jamieson, L., Li, Y., & Stewart, R. (2005). Timespans and plans among young adults. Sociology, 39(1), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnason, J. (2002). The multiplication of modernity. In E. Ben-Rafael & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Identity, culture, and globalization (pp. 131–155). Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, R., & Everett, G. (2008). The prevalence of “life planning”: Evidence from UK graduates. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(3), 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson, D. (2012). Analysing responses to climate change through the lens of reflexivity. The British Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 616–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think global act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudley, K. (1997). The end of the line: Lost jobs, new lives in postindustrial America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climate Change, 77(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Weber, E. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climate Change, 77(1), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations