Skip to main content

Attainable Landing Area Computation of a Lunar Lander with Uncertainty by Reachability Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Soft landing is one of the most critical phases for space missions which require landing a spacecraft on the surface of a body like asteroids or planets. In order to ensure safety and success for the terminal landing phase, in addition to hazard maps obtained by on-board sensors, there is also a need for a map which characterizes the attainable landing area that the lander can achieve by obeying constraints within the presence of uncertainties. This paper proposes a method to obtain the attainable landing area of a lunar lander with uncertainties by reachability analysis. The method obtains the set of achievable states for a dynamical system starting from an initial condition with given admissible control inputs of the system. Nonconvex reachable sets (RS) are computed using optimal control. The candidate landing area on the Moon surface is represented by equidistant grid points and for each point an optimal control problem (OCP) is defined. The corresponding OCP is transcribed into a finite dimensional Nonlinear Programming Problem (NLP) by using Pseudospectral Methods (PSM). The solution of the NLP leads to the RS of the dynamical system. A Riccati equation-based controller is designed to track the reference trajectories. Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to obtain the safely attainable landing area of the lunar lander as probability maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baier R, Büskens C, Chahma IA, Gerdts M (2007) Aproximation of reachable sets by direct solution methods of optimal control problems. Optim Methods Softw 22(3):433–452

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitsios I, Lygeros J (2005) Aerodynamic envelope computation for safe landing of the hl-20 personnel launch vehicle using hybrid control. In: Intelligent control, 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international symposium on, mediterrean conference on control and automation (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benito J, Mease KD (2008) Characterizing the controllable entry states and reachable sites for planetary landing. In: 6th international planetary probe workshop. Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benito J, Mease KD (2010) Reachable and controllable sets for planetary entry and landing. J Guidance Control Dyn 33:2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aubin JP, Frankowska H (1990) Set valued analysis. Birkhauser (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell IM (2002) Application of level set methods to control and reachability problems in continuous and hybrid problems. PhD thesis, Standford University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baier R, Gerdts M (2009) A computational method for non-convex reachable sets using optimal control. In: Proceedings of the European control conference (ECC) 2009, August 23–26, Budapest, Hungary (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garg D (2011) Advances in global pseudospectral methods for optimal control. PhD thesis, University of Florida (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oehlschlägel T, Theil S, Krüger H, Knauer M, Tietjen J, Büskens C (2011) Optimal guidance and control of lunar landers with non-throttable main engine. In: Advances in aerospace guidance. Navigation and control. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garg D, Patterson MA, Francolin C, Darby CL, Huntington G, Hager W, Rao AV (2011) Direct trajectory optimization and costate estimation offinite-horizon and infinite-horizon optimal control problems using a radau pseudospectral method. Comput Optim Appl 49:335–358

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fahroo M, Ross F (2011) On discrete-time optimal conditions for pseudospectral methods. In: AIAA/AAS astrodynamics specialist conference, (Keystone, Colorado), August 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huntington GD (2007) Advancement and analysis of a gauss pseudospectral transcription for optimal control problems. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  13. Runge C (1901) Über empirische funktionen und die interpolation zwischen äquidistanten ordinaten. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 46:224–243

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sagliano M, Samaan M, Theil S, Mooij E (2014) Shefex-3 optimal feedback entry guidance. In: AIAA space 2014 conference and exposition

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sagliano M (2014) Performance analysis of linear and nonlinear techniques for automatic scaling of discretized control problems. Oper Res Lett 42:213–216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Sagliano M, Theil S (2013) Hybrid jacobian computation for fast optimal trajectories generation. In: AIAA guidance, navigation and control (GNC) conference

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arslantas YE, Oehlschlägel T, Sagliano M, Theil S, Braxmaier C (2014) Approximation of attainable landing area of a moon lander by reachability analysis. In: 17th international conference on hybrid systems: computation and control

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arslantas YE, Oehlschlägel T, Sagliano M, Theil S, Braxmaier C (2014) Safe landing area determination for a moon lander by reachability analysis. In: International astronautical congress, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kerr ML, Hagenfeldt M, Ospina JA, Ramn JM, Penin LF (2013) Esa lunar lander: approach phase concept and g and c performance. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) conference, (Boston, MA), August 19–22 2013

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davidian KJ, Dieck RH, Chuang I (1987) A detailed description of the uncertainty analysis for high area ratio rocket nozzle tests at the NASA lewis research center, technical report, NASA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported and funded by DLR (German Aerospace Center), DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service) Research Fellowship Programme and the Excellence Initiative of the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunus Emre Arslantas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arslantas, Y.E., Theil, S. (2018). Attainable Landing Area Computation of a Lunar Lander with Uncertainty by Reachability Analysis. In: Dołęga, B., Głębocki, R., Kordos, D., Żugaj, M. (eds) Advances in Aerospace Guidance, Navigation and Control. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65283-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65283-2_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65282-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65283-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics