Advertisement

Ethics of Biobanking in the Arab Region

  • Mamoun Ahram
Chapter
Part of the Research Ethics Forum book series (REFF, volume 5)

Abstract

Biobanks are storage facilities of biospecimens and related information. They are foreseen to promote research efforts and, hence, disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. As a result, several countries including Arab countries have established biobanks at the national level. However, these establishments are associated with a number of ethical aspects as well as several controversial issues including public approval of such initiatives. This chapter discusses the potential of biobanks, highlights major ethical challenges that must be considered when attempting to start a biobank, and offers solutions in order to operate a successful biobank.

Keywords

Biobanking Informed consent Returning research results Data sharing 

References

  1. Abdur Rab, M., M. Afzal, A. Abou-Zeid, and H. Silverman. 2008. Ethical practices for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the World Health Organization: A retrospective data analysis. PloS One 3 (5): e2094.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abou-Zeid, A., H. Silverman, M. Shehata, M. Shams, M. Elshabrawy, T. Hifnawy,... N. Moharram (2010). Collection, storage and use of blood samples for future research: Views of Egyptian patients expressed in a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(9), 539–547.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.033100.
  3. Ahram, M., A. Othman, and M. Shahrouri. 2012. Public perception towards biobanking in Jordan. Biopreservation and Biobanking 10 (4): 361–365.  https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2012.0010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2013. Public support and consent preference for biomedical research and biobanking in Jordan. European Journal of Human Genetics 21 (5): 567–570.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahram, M., A. Othman, M. Shahrouri, and E. Mustafa. 2014. Factors influencing public participation in biobanking. European Journal of Human Genetics 22 (4): 445–451.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahram, M., M. Soubani, L. Abu Salem, H. Saker, and M. Ahmad. 2015. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding genetic testing and genetic counselors in Jordan: A population-based survey. Journal of Genetic Counseling.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9839-3.
  7. Akhu-Zaheya, L.M., M.T. Jagbir, A. Othman, and M. Ahram. 2014. Media use for seeking health/cancer-related information: Findings from knowledge, attitudes and practices towards cancer prevention and care survey in Jordan. International Journal of Nursing Practice 20 (6): 608–615.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alahmad, G., M. Al-Juma, A. Alsuwailem. 2010. Research Biobanks and their ethical and Islamic regulations [Al-Bonook Al-Hayawiyya Al-Bahthiyya Dawabitaha Al-Akhlaqiyya wa Al-Shar’iyya]. Retrieved from Saudi Arabia: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262798001_albnwk_alhywyt_albhthyt_dwabtha_alakhlaqyt_walshryt_ghyath_alahmd_-_mhmd_aljmt_-_bdalzyz_alswylm_alnashr_jamt_alamam_mhmd_bn_swd_alaslamyt_-_alswdyt_-_altbt_bdwn_-_snt_altb_1431h.
  9. Al-Jumah, M.A., and M.A. Abolfotouh. 2011. Public perception and attitude of saudis toward organ and tissue donation. Biopreservation and Biobanking 9 (1): 21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2010.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Al-Qadire, M.M., M.M. Hammami, H.M. Abdulhameed, and E.A. Al Gaai. 2010. Saudi views on consenting for research on medical records and leftover tissue samples. BMC Medical Ethics 11: 18.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-11-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Al-Riyami, A., D. Jaju, S. Jaju, and H.J. Silverman. 2011. The adequacy of informed consent forms in genetic research in Oman: A pilot study. Developing World Bioethics 11 (2): 57–62.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2010.00293.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beskow, L.M., J.Y. Friedman, N.C. Hardy, L. Lin, and K.P. Weinfurt. 2010. Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking. PloS One 5 (10): e13302.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. da Rocha, A.C., and J.A. Seoane. 2008. Alternative consent models for biobanks: The new Spanish law on biomedical research. Bioethics 22 (8): 440–447.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00673.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission. 2012. Eurobarometer 73.1 (Jan–Feb 2010). Brussels: TNS OPINION & SOCIAL. Retrieved from Cologne: https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/sdesc2.asp?no=5000&db=e&doi=10.4232/1.11428.Google Scholar
  15. Forsberg, J.S., M.G. Hansson, and S. Eriksson. 2009. Changing perspectives in biobank research: From individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results. European Journal of Human Genetics 17 (12): 1544–1549.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2009.87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giesbertz, N.A., A.L. Bredenoord, and J.J. van Delden. 2012. Inclusion of residual tissue in biobanks: Opt-in or opt-out? PLoS Biology 10 (8): e1001373.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldenberg, A. J., K. J. Maschke, S. Joffe, J. R. Botkin, E. Rothwell, T. H. Murray,... S. M. Rivera. 2015. IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens. BMC Medical Ethics 16, 32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0020-1.
  18. Gottesman, O., H. Kuivaniemi, G. Tromp, W.A. Faucett, R. Li, T.A. Manolio, eMERGE Network, et al. 2013. The electronic medical records and genomics (eMERGE) network: Past, present, and future. Genetics in Medicine 15 (10): 761–771.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grady, C., L. Eckstein, B. Berkman, D. Brock, R. Cook-Deegan, S.M. Fullerton, et al. 2015. Broad consent for research with biological samples: Workshop conclusions. The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9): 34–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1062162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansson, M.G., J. Dillner, C.R. Bartram, J.A. Carlson, and G. Helgesson. 2006. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? The Lancet Oncology 7 (3): 266–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70618-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helgesson, G., and L. Johnsson. 2005. The right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 8 (3): 315–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0397-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hofmann, B. 2009. Broadening consent – And diluting ethics? Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2): 125–129.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.024851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hollricher, K. 2009. Life sciences in Luxembourg; A new kid on the block. Laboratory Times 6: 16.Google Scholar
  24. Hug, K., G. Hermeren, and M. Johansson. 2012. Withdrawal from biobank research: Considerations and the way forward. Stem Cell Reviews 8 (4): 1056–1065.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-012-9399-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Human Genetics Commission. 2001. Public attitudes to human genetic information. People’s panel quantitative study conducted for the human genetic commission. Retrieved from London: http://www.hgc.gov.uk/.
  26. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics, C, Wellcome Trust Case Control, C, S. Sawcer, G. Hellenthal, M. Pirinen, C.C. Spencer, et al. 2011. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature 476 (7359): 214–219.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khalil, S.S., H.J. Silverman, M. Raafat, S. El-Kamary, and M. El-Setouhy. 2007. Attitudes, understanding, and concerns regarding medical research amongst Egyptians: A qualitative pilot study. BMC Medical Ethics 8: 9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-8-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maschke, K.J. 2006. Alternative consent approaches for biobank research. The Lancet Oncology 7 (3): 193–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70590-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melas, P.A., L.K. Sjoholm, T. Forsner, M. Edhborg, N. Juth, Y. Forsell, and C. Lavebratt. 2010. Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: Empirical data from a Swedish population-based study. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (2): 93–98.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.032367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melham, K., L.B. Moraia, C. Mitchell, M. Morrison, H. Teare, and J. Kaye. 2014. The evolution of withdrawal: Negotiating research relationships in biobanking. Life Science Society Policy 10: 16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0016-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Porteri, C., and P. Borry. 2008. A proposal for a model of informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials for research purposes. Patient Education and Counseling 71 (1): 136–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothwell, E., K.J. Maschke, J.R. Botkin, A. Goldenberg, T.H. Murray, and S.M. Rivera. 2015. Biobanking research and human subjects protections: Perspectives of IRB leaders. IRB 37 (2): 8–13.Google Scholar
  33. Saffi, M., and N. Howard. 2015. Exploring the effectiveness of mandatory premarital screening and genetic counselling programmes for beta-thalassaemia in the Middle East: A scoping review. Public Health Genomics 18 (4): 193–203.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000430837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stein, D.T., and S.F. Terry. 2013. Reforming biobank consent policy: A necessary move away from broad consent toward dynamic consent. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers 17 (12): 855–856.  https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2013.1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teebi, A.S., and S.A. Teebi. 2005. Genetic diversity among the Arabs. Community Genetics 8 (1): 21–26.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000083333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vera-Badillo, F.E., A.J. Templeton, P. de Gouveia, I. Diaz-Padilla, P.L. Bedard, M. Al-Mubarak, et al. 2014. Androgen receptor expression and outcomes in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 106 (1): djt319.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vora, T., and N. Thacker. 2015. Impacts of a biobank: Bridging the gap in translational cancer medicine. Indian Journal Medicine Paediatrica Oncologica 36 (1): 17–23.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.151773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wazaify, M., S.S. Khalil, and H.J. Silverman. 2009. Expression of therapeutic misconception amongst Egyptians: A qualitative pilot study. BMC Medical Ethics 10: 7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-10-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Widdows, H., and S. Cordell. 2011. The ethics of biobanking: Key issues and controversies. Health Care Analysis 19 (3): 207–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0184-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolf, S.M., B.N. Crock, B. Van Ness, F. Lawrenz, J.P. Kahn, L.M. Beskow, et al. 2012. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genetics in Medicine 14 (4): 361–384.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wong, M.L., K.S. Chia, S. Wee, S.E. Chia, J. Lee, W.P. Koh, et al. 2004. Concerns over participation in genetic research among Malay-Muslims, Chinese and Indians in Singapore: A focus group study. Community Genetics 7 (1): 44–54.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000080303.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineThe University of JordanAmmanJordan
  2. 2.Office of ResearchJordan University Hospital, The University of JordanAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations