Advertisement

Challenges of Research Ethics Committees in the Arab Region

  • Hany M. Sleem
  • Henry Silverman
Chapter
Part of the Research Ethics Forum book series (REFF, volume 5)

Abstract

In the last decade health research, including international clinical trials, has increased greatly in the Arab region. However, commentators have voiced concerns that many RECs in this region might not be able to promote high standards of human subject protection due to several challenges that they face. These challenges include the lack of an enabling legal framework at the national level, inadequate institutional support that includes appropriate human and capital resources, insufficient training of members to review studies, inadequate membership diversity, lack of transparency and accountability mechanisms, absence of internal quality improvement programs, and 1lack of assessment mechanisms. We offer several solutions to address these challenges.

References

  1. Abdel-Aal, W., E.A. Ghaffar, and O. El Shabrawy. 2013. Review of the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC), National Research Center of Egypt, 2003–2011. Current Medical Research and Opinion 29 (10): 1411–1417. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2013.815158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP). 2015. Available at: http://www.aahrpp.org
  3. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), and World Health Organization (WHO). 2016. International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Geneva: CIOMS.Google Scholar
  4. Egyptian Network of Research Ethics Committees (ENREC). 2015. Available at: www.enrec.org.
  5. Hyder, A.A., S.A. Wali, A.N. Khan, N.B. Teoh, N.E. Kass, and L. Dawson. 2004. Ethical review of health research: A perspective from developing country researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics 38: 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kass, N., L. Dawson, and N.I. Loyo-Berrios. 2003. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Matar, A., and H. Silverman. 2013. Perspectives of Egyptian research ethics committees regarding their effective functioning. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 8 (1): 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Milford, C., D. Wassenaar, and C. Slack. 2006. Resources and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: Preparations for HIV vaccine trials. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 28: 1–9.Google Scholar
  9. Moodley, K., and L. Myer. 2007. Health research ethics committees in South Africa 12 years into democracy. BMC Medical Ethics 8: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-8-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP). 2015. IRBs and assurances. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/assurances/index.html.
  11. Silaigwana, B., and D. Wassenaar. 2015. Biomedical research ethics committees in sub-Saharan Africa: A collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10 (2): 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615575511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Silverman, H., H. Sleem, K. Moodley, N. Kumar, S. Naidoo, T. Subramanian,. .. M. Moni 2015. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 41(4): 332–337. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101587.Google Scholar
  13. Sleem, H., S. El-Kamary, and H.J. Silverman. 2010a. Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt. BMC Medical Ethics 11: 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sleem, H., R.A. Abdelhai, I. Al-Abdallat, M. Al-Naif, H.M. Gabr, E. T. Kehil, . .. H. Silverman. 2010b. Development of an accessible self-assessment tool for research ethics committees in developing countries. Journal of Empirical Research Human Reseach Ethics 5(3): 85–96; quiz 97–88. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.85.Google Scholar
  15. Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethical Review (SIDCER). 2015. SIDCER recognition programme: Available at: http://www.who.int/sidcer/en/
  16. World Medical Association. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/
  17. Younis, I.M. 2015. Overview of research committees status in Egypt: Challenges aspirations and current situation. Accountability in Research 22 (4): 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.956869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Egyptian Network of Research Ethics Committees (ENREC)CairoEgypt
  2. 2.National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute (NHTMRI)CairoEgypt
  3. 3.University of MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations