Advertisement

Introduction

  • Henry Silverman
Chapter
Part of the Research Ethics Forum book series (REFF, volume 5)

Abstract

Recently, there has been a growth of scholarship in research ethics accompanied by several revisions of international research ethics guidelines highlighting issues pertaining to international collaborative research performed in low and middle income countries (LMICs) (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) and World Health Organization (WHO) 2016; World Medical Association 2013). Several reasons explain for focusing the lens of research ethics on international collaborative research. First and foremost, commentators have expressed concerns regarding inadequate protection of the rights and welfare of research participants leading to unnecessary harms, exploitation, and injustices at both the micro and macro levels (Bhutta 2002; London 2010; Pratt and Loff 2014). Second, oversight mechanisms that exist in LMICs have not been able to respond effectively to the ethical and legal issues that arise from the growth of such research, especially clinical trials (Kirigia et al. 2005; Moodley and Myer 2007). Indeed, many commentators have expressed concerns about the lack of regulatory oversight and the ineffectiveness of ethics review in LMICs (Bhutta 2002; Hyder et al. 2009; Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2002). Third, there is a growing recognition that the local context governed by culture and religion warrant differences in the application of general principles of research ethics, but there is controversy regarding whether such applications of ethics principles respect local diversity or whether they represent inappropriate double standards (Christakis 1992; Landes 2005; Macklin 2004; Tangwa 2004). Finally, studies have demonstrated the marked prevalence of research misbehaviors that include data falsification and fabrication, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship practices, and lack of transparency regarding conflicts of interest (Okonta and Rossouw 2013, 2014).

References

  1. Abdur Rab, M., A. Abou-Zeid, M. Afzal, and H.J. Silverman. 2008. Ethical practices for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the world health organization: A retrospective data analysis. PloS One 3: e2094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abou-Zeid, A., M. Afzal, and H.J. Silverman. 2006. Informed consent as an ethical requirement for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the World Health Organization. Washington, DC: PRIM&R Conference.Google Scholar
  3. Abraham, R. 2011. MENA: The dawn of a new era: The Middle East and North Africa region has seen a recent increase in clinical trials research. Applied Clinical Trials. Google Scholar
  4. Adams, K, C. King, D. Pendlebury, D. Hook, and J. Wilson. 2011. Global research report Middle East. Thomson Reuters. Available at: http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/sw-article/media/globalresearchreport-aptme.pdf
  5. Al-Gazali, L., H. Hamamy, and S. Al-Arrayad. 2006. Genetic disorders in the Arab world. BMJ 333: 831–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alahmad, G., M. Al-Jumah, and K. Dierickx. 2012. Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries. BMC Medical Ethics 13: 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asem, N., and H.J. Silverman. 2009. Perspectives of faculty at Cairo Universitiy towards research ethics and informed consent. Nashville: Abstract Presentation at PRIM&R.Google Scholar
  8. Bhutta, A.Z. 2002. Ethics in international health research: A perspective from the developing world. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 80: 114–120.Google Scholar
  9. Christakis, N.A. 1992. Ethics are local: Engaging cross-cultural variation in the ethics for clinical research. Social Science & Medicine 35 (9): 1079–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), and World Health Organization (WHO). 2016. International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Vol. Retrieved from: http://www.cioms.ch/index.php/12-newsflash/400-cioms-inernational-ethical-guidelines
  11. El-Dessouky, H.F., A.M. Abdel-Aziz, C. Ibrahim, M. Moni, R. Abul Fadl, and H. Silverman. 2011. Knowledge, awareness, and attitudes about research ethics among dental faculty in the Middle East: A pilot study. International Journal of Dentistry 2011: 694759. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/694759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emanuel, E.J., L.E. Schnipper, D.Y. Kamin, J. Levinson, and A.S. Lichter. 2003. The costs of conducting clinical research. Journal of Clinical Oncology 21: 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glickman, S.W., J.G. McHutchison, E.D. Peterson, C.B. Cairns, R.A. Harrington, R.M. Califf, and K.A. Schulman. 2009. Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. The New England Journal of Medicine 360 (8): 816–823. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb0803929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Global Forum for Health Research. 2000. The 10/90 report on health research. Last Accessed 23 Apr 2013 at: http://announcementsfiles.cohred.org/gfhr_pub/assoc/s14791e/s14791e.pdf
  15. Gulf Daily News. 2016. Clinical trials to be rolled out in Bahrain. Retrieved from: http://www.tradearabia.com/news/HEAL_300785.html
  16. Hyder, A.A., L. Dawson, A.M. Bachani, and J.V. Lavery. 2009. Moving from research ethics review to research ethics systems in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 373: 862–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kandeel, N., A. El-Nemer, N.M. Ali, H. Kassem, M. El-Setouhy, M.E. Elgharieb, et al. 2011. A multicenter study of the awareness and attitudes of Egyptian faculty towards research ethics: A pilot study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6 (4): 99–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirigia, J.M., C. Wambebe, and A. Baba-Moussal. 2005. Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region. BMC Medical Ethics 6: 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landes, M. 2005. Can context justify an ethical double standard for clinical research in developing countries? Globalization and Health 1 (1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-1-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. London, A.J. 2010. Justice in the application of science: Beyond fair benefits. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6): 54–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2010.483184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Macklin, R. 2004. Double standards in medical research in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malakoff, D. 2008. Clinical trials and tribulations: Spiralng costs threaten gridlock. Science 322: 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marwan Felaefel, M., M. Salem, R. Jaafar, G. Jassim, H. Edwards, F. Rashid-Doubell, R. Yousri, N. Ali, and H. Silverman. 2017a. A cross-sectional survey study to assess prevalence and attitudes regarding research misconduct among investigators in the Middle East. Journal of Academic Ethics: 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9295-9.
  24. Misik, V. 2012. Expected growth of industry-sponsored clinical trials in the Middle East bencharked on other global regions. Accessed 12 Jan 2014 at: http://www.quintiles.com/assets/2010/2111/2118/2233/1336/96587bf96585-cb96581e-94982-96588f96589b-bf96632aba99661.pdf
  25. Moodley, K., and L. Myer. 2007. Health research ethics committees in South Africa 12 years into democracy. BMC Medical Ethics 8: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Normile, D. 2008. The promise and pitfalls of clinical trials overseas. Science 322: 214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2002. The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
  28. Nwabueze, R.N. 2016. Legal and ethical regulation of biomedical research in developing countries. New York: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).Google Scholar
  29. Okonta, P., and T. Rossouw. 2013. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics 13 (3): 149–157.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Okonta, P.I., and T. Rossouw. 2014. Misconduct in research: A descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country. BMC Medical Ethics 15: 25.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pratt, B., and B. Loff. 2014. A framework to link international clinical research to the promotion of justice in global health. Bioethics 28 (8): 387–396.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schipper I, and F. Weyzig. 2008. Ethics for drug testing in low and middle INcome countries: Considerations for European market authorisation. Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO), Retrieved at: https://www.somo.nl/ethics-for-drugs-testing-in-low-and-middle-income-countries/
  33. Sleem, H., R. Adelhai, I. Al-Abdallat, M. Al-Naif, H. Gabr, E.T. Kehil, et al. 2010a. Development of an accessible self-assessment tool for research ethics committees in developing countries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6: 85–96.Google Scholar
  34. Sleem, H., S. El-Kamary, and H.J. Silverman. 2010b. Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt. BMC Medical Ethics 11: 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tangwa, G.B. 2004. Between universalism and relativism: A conceptual exploration of problems in formulating and applying international biomedical ethical guidelines. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1): 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organizations. n.d. UNESCO science report 2010. The current status of science around the world. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001898/189883E.pdf
  37. World Medical Association. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations