Skip to main content

The Farm, the Farmer, and Labor Supply

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Development and Economic Transformation

Abstract

Rapid agricultural growth with all its benefits is possible because of the potential for the small commercial farmer to change from low-productivity underutilization of resources in traditional agriculture to high-productivity greater use of resources in a modernizing agriculture. The conditions of traditional agriculture provide the base for modernization, influencing how it proceeds, and its impact. Of particular importance are the labor/leisure choices of the small commercial farmer, how they differ considerably and among farms, and how that provides the basis for quite different outcomes in a variety of situations. Discussion of policies for increasing production in traditional agriculture explains why continuous rapid growth does not occur in traditional agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I make these and later observations on the basis of decades of observing rural areas in various stages of development and from perusing a wide literature, particularly including: the field surveys at IFPRI while I was the Director; and J. Lossing Buck’s (1937) massive China field studies. The latter was of a traditional agriculture and is an unusually detailed source. It shows a high degree of variability throughout the country, with greatest variability in the higher productivity areas; Mellor (1963, 1966; Mellor and Stevens 1956) provides that detail for one area in India, representative of the Indo-Gangetic Plain; Jayne and his colleagues at Michigan State University have published numerous papers that describe a similar agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa with great variability within similar areas; the large rural household surveys published in numerous World Bank papers for many countries in Asia and Africa and include areas still dominated by traditional agriculture and showing similar variability.

References

  • Barrett, C. B. (1996). On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 51(2), 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Sherlund, S. M., & Adesina, A. A. (2008). Shadow wages, allocative inefficiency, and labor supply in smallholder agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 38(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Bellemare, M. F., & Hou, J. Y. (2010). Reconsidering conventional explanations of the inverse productivity–size relationship. World Development, 38(1), 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. L. (1937). Land utilization in China: A study of 16,786 farms in 168 localities, and 38,256 farm families in twenty-two province in China, 1929–1933. Shanghai: University of Nanking.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M., & Sadoulet, E. (1991). Peasant household behaviour with missing markets: Some paradoxes explained. The Economic Journal, 101(409), 1400–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2011). The state of food and agriculture: Women in agriculture, closing the gender gap for development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirashima, S. (1977). Zamindars and kammees in the Punjab: An economic analysis of non-farm households in the Pakistan Punjab. In S. Hirashima (Ed.), Hired labor in rural Asia. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. K. (1987). Women’s role and agricultural technology. In J. W. Mellor, C. L. Delgado, & M. J. Blackie (Eds.), Accelerating food production in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 135–147). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J. W. (1963). The use and productivity of farm family labor in early stages of agricultural development. Journal of Farm Economics, 45(3), 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J. W. (1966). The economics of agricultural development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J. W., & Stevens, R. D. (1956). The average and marginal product of farm labor in underdeveloped economies. Journal of Farm Economics, 38(3), 780–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Lopez, A., Christiaensen, L., & Kilic, T. (2017). How much of the labor in African agriculture is provided by women? Food Policy, 67, 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1975). The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(3), 827–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group. (2012). World development report 2012: Gender equality in development. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mellor, J.W. (2017). The Farm, the Farmer, and Labor Supply. In: Agricultural Development and Economic Transformation. Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65259-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65259-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65258-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65259-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics