Skip to main content
Book cover

Air Lasing pp 45–74Cite as

The Role of Electron Collisions in Lasing in Neutral and Singly Ionized Molecular Nitrogen

  • 1099 Accesses

Part of the Springer Series in Optical Sciences book series (SSOS,volume 208)

Abstract

In this chapter, we will discuss lasing actions in the air that follow the excitation with a short intense laser pulse at 800 nm. We will successively analyze two types of laser actions. The first type is based on the optical transition between the excited triplet states of the neutral nitrogen molecule. Based on the study of the dependence of the lasing signal on the polarization ellipticity of the pump pulse, we unambiguously attribute gain mechanism in this scheme to the electron collisions with neutral nitrogen molecules that result in population inversion. Experimental results on the dynamics of emissions in the forward and backward directions with respect to the direction of the pump pulse are confirmed by numerical simulations based on the Maxwell-Bloch equations. The second type of lasing stems from the transition between the second electronically excited state and the ground state of a singly ionized nitrogen molecule. After reviewing current interpretations of this emission process, which remains to be a controversial issue, we will focus on our interpretation that links stimulated emission in this scheme to superradiance. We will argue that electron recollisions play an essential role in establishing the superradiant gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 3.1
Fig. 3.2
Fig. 3.3
Fig. 3.4
Fig. 3.5
Fig. 3.6
Fig. 3.7
Fig. 3.8
Fig. 3.9
Fig. 3.10
Fig. 3.11
Fig. 3.12
Fig. 3.13
Fig. 3.14
Fig. 3.15
Fig. 3.16
Fig. 3.17
Fig. 3.18
Fig. 3.19
Fig. 3.20

References

  1. A. Dogariu, J.B. Michael, M.O. Scully, R.B. Miles, Science 331(6016), 442–445 (2011)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Yao et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 051802(R) (2011)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Mitryukovskiy, Y. Liu, P. Ding, A. Houard, A. Mysyrowicz, Opt. Express 22(11), 12750–12759 (2014)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Xu, E. Lotstedt, A. Iwasaki, K. Yamanouchi, Nat. Commun. 6, 8347 (2015)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 133203 (2015)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Yao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 143007 (2016)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.J. Traverso et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 15185 (2012)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Laurain, M. Scheller, P. Polynkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 253901 (2014)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Kartashov et al., Phys. Rev. A 86(3), 033831 (2012)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Dogariu, R.B. Miles, In Frontiers in Optics 2013/Laser Science XXIX, Orlando, Florida, 2013 (Orlando, Laser Science, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Kocharovsky et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 102, 7806 (2005)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Q. Luo, W. Liu, S.L. Chin, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 76, 337 (2003)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. P.N. Malevich et al., Opt. Lett. 40, 2469 (2015)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Kartashov et al., Phys. Rev. A 88, 041805(R) (2013)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Liu, Y. Brelet, G. Point, A. Houard, A. Mysyrowicz, Opt. Express 21(19), 22791–22798 (2013)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. P.J. Ding et al., Opt. Express 22, 29964 (2014)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Yao et al., Opt. Express 22, 19005 (2014)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Mitryukovskiy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 063003 (2015)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. P.J. Ding, E. Oliva, A. Houard, A. Mysyrowicz, Y. Liu, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043824 (2016)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Wang et al., Las. Phys. Lett. 10, 125401 (2013)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S.L. Chin, H. Xu, Y. Cheng, Z. Xu, Chin. Opt. Lett. 10, 013201 (2013)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Kartashov et al, Research in Optical Sciences, HTh4b. 5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Azarm, P. Corkum, P. Polynkin, CLEO: Applications and Technology 2016, postdeadline paper JTh4B.9 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Couairon, A. Mysyrowicz, Phys. Rep. 441, 47–198 (2007)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. H.L. Xu, A. Azarm, J. Bernhardt, Y. Kamali, S.L. Chin, Chem. Phys. 360, 171–175 (2009)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Arnold, S. Roberson, P.M. Pellegrino, Chem. Phys. 405, 9 (2012)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Becker, A.D. Bandrauk, S.L. Chin, Chem. Phys. Let. 343, 345 (2001)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. P.H. Bucksbaum, M. Bashkansky, R.R. Freeman, T.J. McIlrath, L.F. DiMauro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2590–2593 (1986)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. P.B. Corkum, N.H. Burnett, F. Brunel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1259–1262 (1989)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Mitryukovskiy, Y. Liu, A. Houard, A. Mysyrowicz, J. Phys. B Atomic Mol. Phys. 48, 094003 (2015)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. X.-L. Liu, W. Cheng, M. Petrarca, P. Polynkin, Opt. Lett. 41, 4751 (2016)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. R.S. Kunabenchi, M.R. Gorbal, M.I. Savadatti, Prog. Quant. Electron. 9, 259 (1984)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. H.M. von Bergmann, V. Hasson, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 11, 2341 (1978)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Zhao et al., J. Phys. D : Appl. Phys. 46, 345201 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Sprangle, J. Peñano, B. Hafizi, D. Gordon, M. Scully, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 211102 (2011)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Peñano et al., J. Appl. Phys. 111, 033105 (2012)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. E. Oliva et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 013811 (2011)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. O. Larroche et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 043815 (2000)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. T. Tabata, T. Shirai, M. Sataka, H. Kubo, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 92, 375–406 (2006)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. R. Al’miev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 123902 (2007)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. J. Yao et al., New J. Phys. 15, 023046 (2013)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Y.D. Qin, H. Yang, C.J. Zhu, Q. Gong, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 71, 581–584 (2000)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. W. Chu et al., Las. Phys. Lett 11, 015301 (2014)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. J. Yao et al., Arxiv 1608, 05183 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. X, 041009 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. D. Kartashov et al, CLEO: science and innovations, QTh4E. 6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. G. Li et al., Phys. Rev. A 89, 033833 (2014)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. J.C. MacGillivray, M.S. Feld, Phys. Rev. A 14, 1169 (1976)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. H. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. A 88, 063417 (2013)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. P.B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. N.H. Burnett, C. Kan, P.B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. A 51, R3418 (1995)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Y. Ivanov, T. Brabec, N. Burnett, Phys. Rev. A 54, 742 (1996)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. M. Kakehata, H. Takada, H. Yumoto, K. Miyazaki, Phys. Rev. A 55, R861 (1997)

    CrossRef  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge fruitful collaborations with Eduardo Oliva of Madrid Technical University (Spain), Shihua Chen of Southeast University (China), Nevel Ibrakoivc, Samuel Bengtsso, Cord Arnold, Hohan Mauritsson, and Anne L’Huiller of Lund University (Sweden), Arnaud Couairon of Ecole Polytechnique (France), Rostyslav Danylo of Ecole Polytechnique (France), Sergey Mitryukovskiy of Russian Quantum Center (Russia), and Vladimir Tikhonchuk of Bordeaux University (France). Y. Liu would like to thank Hongbing Jiang and Chengyin Wu of Peking University (China), Ya Cheng and Jinping Yao of SIOM (China), and Huailiang Xu of Jilin University (China) for the stimulating and fruitful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratorie d’Optique Appliquée, ENSTA ParisTech, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 Boulevard des Maréchaux, 91762, Palaiseau, France

    Yi Liu, Pengji Ding, Aurélien Houard & André Mysyrowicz

  2. Shanghai Key Lab for Modern Optical System, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 200093, Shanghai, China

    Yi Liu

  3. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, 730000, Lanzhou, China

    Pengji Ding

Authors
  1. Yi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pengji Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aurélien Houard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. André Mysyrowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

    Prof. Pavel Polynkin

  2. Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China

    Prof. Ya Cheng

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, Y., Ding, P., Houard, A., Mysyrowicz, A. (2018). The Role of Electron Collisions in Lasing in Neutral and Singly Ionized Molecular Nitrogen. In: Polynkin, P., Cheng, Y. (eds) Air Lasing. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol 208. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65220-7_3

Download citation