Abstract
As performances are rarely observable, evaluation errors may occur. We observe how women react to evaluation errors and wrongful reward assessment in organizations. In particular, we focus on severity and leniency errors in the evaluation of performances. Severity errors occur when workers do not receive the reward although they exerted high effort and reached the target. Leniency errors occur when workers are rewarded even when they exerted low effort and did not reach the target. They are both detrimental to motivation and effort provision. Our findings from a laboratory experiment show that, when gender is considered, asymmetric results are shown for men and women. Whereas males drop their contribution more under severity errors rather than leniency errors, female tend to do the opposite. We discuss these results contributing to the literature on organizational justice by investigating the role of gender in the perception of justice within organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abeler, J., Falk, A., Goette, L., & Huffman, D. (2011). Reference points and effort provision. The American Economic Review, 101(2), 470–492.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.
Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2009). Women don’t ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2000). Gender Differences in Pay. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 75–99.
Brockner, J., & Adsit, L. (1986). The moderating impact of sex on the equity–satisfaction relationship: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(4), 585.
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Foley, S., Hang-Yue, N., & Wong, A. (2005). Perceptions of discrimination and justice: Are there gender differences in outcomes? Group & Organization Management, 30(4), 421–450.
Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22.
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.
Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 222–234.
Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239.
Lee, C., & Farh, J. L. (1999). The effects of gender in organizational justice perception. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(1), 133–143.
Marchegiani, L., Reggiani, T., & Rizzolli, M. (2016). Loss averse agents and lenient supervisors in performance appraisal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131, 183–197.
Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Expectancy-value models in organizational psychology. InExpectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 293–312).
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101.
Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). Introduction to special topic forum: The future of work motivation theory. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379–387.
Sweeney, P.D., & McFarlin, D.B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83–98.
Pritchard, R. D. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 176–211.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2002). Examining the construct of organizational justice: A meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(3), 193–203.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation (p. 45). NY: John Wiley & sons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marchegiani, L., Reggiani, T., Rizzolli, M. (2018). Gender Effects in Injustice Perceptions: An Experiment on Error Evaluation and Effort Provision. In: Paoloni, P., Lombardi, R. (eds) Gender Issues in Business and Economics. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65193-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65193-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65192-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65193-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)