Interval-Based Gender Diversity Composite Indicators in Gender Studies
This study aims to construct an original interval-based composite indicator of the gender diversity considering different assumptions on the development of the composite indicator. In this way the composite indicator built can be considered more robust than a classical version of the same indicator. Composite indicators are a very important tool to analyse and evaluate policies and sectors. The problem in using composite indicators is that the results which can be obtained can be dependent to the assumptions given on their construction. In this sense we have already considered an initial approach in the construction of composite indicator (Paoloni et al. (2016) Towards a new architecture of knowledge: Big data, culture and creativity. Proceedings, 15–17 June 2016 Dresden Germany (pp. 1944–1958)). We take into account different assumptions, and we are able to construct an interval-based composite indicator. In this way we can consider a value which is useful for the comparison (the chosen assumption), a centre of the composite indicator, and the range which is related to the variability due to the different assumptions. Our work contributes to the existing literature on composite indicators in gender studies. In particular our work is addressed on providing a composite indicator of gender diversity for the listed European companies. This study is useful to policy purposes because it helps the process of decision-making which can be based on the different rankings which are derived from the interval-based composite indicators.
KeywordsGender Composite indicators Europe ESG Corporate reporting Women Board
- Adams, C., & Harte, G. (1999). Towards corporate accountability for equal opportunities performance, occasional research paper no. 26. London: CAET.Google Scholar
- Aiello F., & Attanasio, M. (n.d.). Some issues in constructing composite indicators. Retrieved from: http://www3.unisi.it/eventi/dmq2006/paper/Aiello_Attanasio.pdf
- Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2004). Through the eyes of management: Narrative reporting through three sectors. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.Google Scholar
- Boyatzis, M. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Thematic analysis and code development. Cleveland: Sage, Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
- Drago, C. (2014, November). Interval based composite indicators. Conference paper conference of european statistics stakeholders, at Rome. doi: 10.13140/2.1.1280.6721.
- Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2003/16, O). Google Scholar
- Grosser, K., Adams, C. & Moon, J. (2008). Equal opportunities for women in the workplace: A study of corporate disclosure, research report 102, The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, ACCA.Google Scholar
- International Labour Organization (ILO) (2017). Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, available at http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/--- multi/documents/publication/wcms_094386.pdf. (Last access 30th May 2017).
- International Organization for Standardization (2010). ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility, available at https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:26000:ed-1:v1:en (Last access 30th May 2017).Google Scholar
- Krippendorff K. (2004). Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Krippendorff, K. H., & Bock, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- OECD (2011). Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2011. Edition available at https://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/48004323.pdf (Last access 30th May 2017).Google Scholar
- Paoloni, P., Doni, F., & Drago, C. (2016). Gender diversity indicator, corporate environmental and financial performance: Evidence from Europe. In Towards a new architecture of knowledge: Big data, culture and creativity. Proceedings, 15–17 June 2016 Dresden Germany (pp. 1944–1958). IFKAD 2016.Google Scholar
- Rhode, A. K., & Packel, D. L. (2010). Diversity on corporate boards: How much difference does difference make? (Rock center for corporate governance working paper series 89). SSRN Journal. pp. 1–24. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1685615. Accessed April 2016.
- Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(2), 307–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985x.2005.00350.x.
- United Nations (UN) Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf. (Last access 30th may 2017)
- United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2010). Gender Inequality Index (GII). Available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii. (Last access 30th May 2017)
- Vanstraelen, A., Zarzeski, M. T., & Robb, S. W. G. (2003). Corporate nonfinancial disclosure practices and financial analyst forecast ability across three European countries. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 14(3), 249–278. doi: 10.1111/1467-646x.00098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar