Advertisement

Intellectual Capital and Gender Capital: The Case of Italian Universities

  • Raffaeue Trequattrini
  • Fabio Nappo
  • Aiessandra Lardo
  • Benedstta Cuozzo
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This chapter aims to understand whether the organizations characterized by the culture of diversity and inclusion are organizations that promote the creation of value. Starting from the hypothesis that gender capital, considered as gender diversity within a business reality, facilitates the transfer of interpersonal skills and relationships with stakeholders and company culture, our analysis is aimed at assessing the impact of gender capital on intellectual capital of organizations and, in particular, on its components (human capital, relational capital, structural capital). The research proposes a quantitative method. In the first step of the analysis, for each university the number of women full professors, associate professors and researchers are identified as independent variables. In the second step, the intellectual capital components are identified by the quota premium that universities receive from the ministry for research and teaching activities as dependent variables. To assess the impact that gender capital has on intellectual capital, the independent variables are correlated with the dependent variables. This methodology allows us to understand if the culture of diversity is able to generate greater value within organizations, in particular, if women’s skills can make a real difference to foster the competitive advantage of an organization. Moreover, this study contributes expanding the literature on gender studies and it offers a new perspective applied to the concept of gender capital. The outcomes of the application are related to a better understanding the need to fill the cultural and social gap. The results allow asserting that to implement diversity within organizations and develop the principle of inclusion enables to create greater value in organizations.

Keywords

Gender capital University Women Intellectual capital 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This paper is the result of a group effort of analysis and reflection, Raffaele Trequattrini, authored Sects. 12.6 and 12.8; Fabio Nappo, Sects. 12.3 and 12.4; Alessandra Lardo, Sect. 12.1 and 12.5; and Benedetta Cuozzo, Sect. 12.2 and 12.7. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Anderson, D., Sweeney, D., Williams, T., Camm, J., & Cochran, J. (2012). Quantitative methods for business. London: Cengage Learning EMEA.Google Scholar
  2. Andres, L., & Adamuti-Trache, M. (2007). You’ve come a long way, baby? Persistent gender inequality in university enrolment and completion in Canada, 1979–2004. Canadian Public Policy, 33(1), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldarelli, M. G., Del Baldo, M., & Vignini, S. (2015). White flies in Italian accounting scholars: Some suggestions from the past. Paper presented at VIII Accounting History International Conference Accounting’s history in diverse industries and other settings, Ballarat, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Baldarelli, M. G., Del Baldo, M., & Vignini, S. (2016). Disuguaglianza di genere nel contesto accademico e universitario in Italia: il contributo delle studiose di Economia Aziendale. In P. Paoloni (Ed.), I mondi delle donne. Percorsi interdisplinari (pp. 1–26). Roma: EDI Cusano, Collana Studi e Ricerche. isbn: 978-88–98948–05–5.Google Scholar
  5. Bagilhole, B. (2002). Challenging equal opportunities; changing and adapting male hegemony in academia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bianco, M. L. (2002). Effetti della riforma dei concorsi universitari su carriere accademiche e dinamiche di genere. Polis, 16(3), 417–441.Google Scholar
  8. Bridges, T. S. (2009). Gender capital and male bodybuilders. Body & Society, 15(1), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cañibano, L., & Sánchez, M. P. (2009). Intangibles in universities: Current challenges for measuring and reporting. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 13(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorrego, P. F., Costa, R. V., & Fernández, C. F. J. (2013). Product innovation and relational capital: Evidence from Portugal. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 295–308.Google Scholar
  12. Dumay, J. (2016). A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: From reporting to disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(1), 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Facchini, C. (1997). Uomini e donne nell’università italiana. In R. Moscati (Ed.), Chi governa l’Università? (Vol. 1997, pp. 214–244). Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
  14. Frattini, R., & Rossi, P. (2012). Report sulle donne nell’universitá italiane. Meno di zero III (8–9).Google Scholar
  15. Granelli, A., & Robotti, O. (2016). Introduzione. Il valore premiante delle diversità. InLa chiave per rendere la vostra azienda più forte, creativa e competitiva (pp. 7–14). Milano: Harvard Business Review Italia, StrategiQs.Google Scholar
  16. Grieco, P. (2016). La diversità è ricchezza. ll valore premiante delle diversità. InLa chiave per rendere la vostra azienda più forte, creativa e competitiva (p. 28). Milano: Harvard Business Review Italia, StrategiQs.Google Scholar
  17. Groysberg, B., & Connolly, K. (2016). I grandi leader che hanno realizzato l’inclusione. ll valore premiante delle diversità. InLa chiave per rendere la vostra azienda più forte, creativa e competitiva (pp. 47–64). Milano: Harvard Business Review Italia, StrategiQs.Google Scholar
  18. Leitner, K. H., & Warden, C. (2004). Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organizations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 15(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leitner, K. H., Curaj, A., Elena-Perez, S., Fazlagic, J., Kalemis, K., Martinaitis, Z., et al. (2014). A strategic approach for intellectual capital management in European universities. Guidelines for implementation. Bucharest: UEFISCDI Blueprint Series No. 1. Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding.Google Scholar
  20. Murray, A., Papa, A., Cuozzo, B., & Russo, G. (2016). Evaluating the innovation of the Internet of things: Empirical evidence from the Intellectual Capital assessment. Business Process Management Journal, 2(2), 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mouritsen, J., Larsden, H.T., & Bukh, P.N.D. (2001). Intellectual capital and the capable firm: narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7), 735–62.Google Scholar
  22. Myers, M. D. (2015). Qualitative research in business & management. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palomba, R. (2003). Figlie di Minerva. Primo rapporto sulle carriere femminili negli Enti Pubblici di Ricerca italiani. Franco Angeli: Milano.Google Scholar
  25. Paoloni, P. (2011). La dimensione relazionale delle imprese femminili. Franco Angeli: Milano.Google Scholar
  26. Paoloni, P., & Dumay, J. (2015). The relational capital of micro-enterprises run by women: the start-up phase. Vine, 45(2), 172–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 79–90.Google Scholar
  28. Roehler, K. P. (2016). Per una cultura realmente inclusiva. Il valore premiante delle diversità. InLa chiave per rendere la vostra azienda più forte, creativa e competitiva (p. 29). Milano: Harvard Business Review Italia, StrategiQs.Google Scholar
  29. Sala, E. (2008). Donne, uomini e potere. Disuguaglianze di genere in azienda, politica, accademica. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  30. Sánchez, M. P., Elena, S., & Castrillo, R. (2009). Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sánchez, M. P., & Elena, S. (2006). Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(4), 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Secundo, G., Dumay, J., Schiuma, G., & Passiante, G. (2016). Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stewart, T., & Ruckdeschel, C. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Performance Improvement, 37(7), 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organizing for innovation and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Todericiu, R., & Şerban, A. (2015) Intellectual Capital and its Relationship with Universities. Paper presented at 22nd International Economic Conference–IECS 2015 “Economic Prospects in the Context of Growing Global and Regional Interdependencies”, IECS 2015 Procedia Economics and Finance 27, p. 713–717.Google Scholar
  36. Trequattrini, R., Shams, R., Lardo, A., & Lombardi, R. (2016). Risk of an epidemic impact when adopting the internet of things: The role of sector-based resistance. Business Process Management Journal, 22(2), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Veltri, S., Mastroleo, G., & Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M. (2014). Measuring the intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waters, D. (2008). Quantitative methods for business. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  39. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raffaeue Trequattrini
    • 1
  • Fabio Nappo
    • 1
  • Aiessandra Lardo
    • 1
  • Benedstta Cuozzo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and LawUniversity of Cassino and Southern LazioCassinoItaly

Personalised recommendations