Intelligent Food Information Provision to Consumers in an Internet of Food Era

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 506)


Food information is a crucial tool for facilitating consumers in decision-making activities related to their consumption process. Recent advances in “Internet of food” technologies (such as food sensors, cloud computing, food data analysis, and mobile app technologies) makes possible to conceive new consumer information platforms. The rationale is to empower consumers by letting them get more relevant food information than they usually obtain through on-product labeling, mass media or other traditional channels. In this paper, we envisage a new generation of food information provision services, called intelligent food services (IFSs), which would be responsive to consumer’s expectations and information needs. We outline IFS structure and main features as well as constitutive elements of user-IFS interaction context. Particularly, we focus on food-in-context awareness capability and we discuss its influence on consumer and IFS behaviors.


Intelligent food services Internet of food Food-in-context awareness Food information provision 


  1. 1.
    Ghvanidze, S., Velikova, N., Dodd, T.H., Oldewage-Theron, W.: Consumers’ environmental and ethical consciousness and the use of the related food products information: the role of perceived consumer effectiveness. Appetite 107, 311–322 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lando, A.M., Labiner-Wolfe, J.: Helping consumers make more healthful food choices: consumer views on modifying food labels and providing point-of-purchase nutrition information at quick-service restaurants. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 39(3), 157–163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Downey, G.: Advances in food authenticity testing. Woodhead Publishing series in food science, technology and nutrition (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verbeke, W.: Impact of communication on consumers’ food choices. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 67(3), 281–288 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bialkova, S., Grunert, K.G., van Trijp, H.: Standing out in the crowd: the effect of information clutter on consumer attention for front-of-pack nutrition labels. Food Policy 41, 65–74 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Volpentesta, A.P., Ammirato, S.; Evaluating web interfaces of B2C e-commerce systems for typical agrifood products. In: Pittaway, L., Koh, S.C.L. (eds.) The Adoption of Innovation and Technology by Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. (special issue). International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, vol. 7, No. 1, p. 74 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Volpentesta, A.P., Felicetti, A.M.: Analyzing App-Based services providing consumers with food information. In: Spender, J.C., Schiuma, G., Noennig, J.R. (eds.) Towards a New Architecture of Knowledge: Big Data, Culture and Creativity. ISSN 2280-787X. Proceedings of 11th edition of the International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics Dresden – Germany 15–17 June 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sorak, D., Herberholz, L., Iwascek, S., Altinpinar, S., Pfeifer, F., Siesler, H.W.: New developments and applications of handheld Raman, mid-infrared, and near-infrared spectrometers. Appl. Spectro. Rev. 47(2), 83–115 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cozzolino, D.: The role of vibrational spectroscopy as a tool to assess economically motivated fraud and counterfeit issues in agricultural products and foods. Anal. Meth. 7(22), 9390–9400 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casale, M., Simonetti, R.: Review: near infrared spectroscopy for analysing olive oils. J. Near Infrared Spectro. 22(2), 59–80 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steele, R.: An overview of the state of the art of automated capture of dietary intake information. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 55(13), 1929–1938 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kong, F., Tan, J.: DietCam: automatic dietary assessment with mobile camera phones. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 8(1), 147–163 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pu, Y.Y., Feng, Y.Z., Sun, D.W.: Recent progress of hyperspectral imaging on quality and safety inspection of fruits and vegetables: a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 14(2), 176–188 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peris, M., Escuder-Gilabert, L.: A 21st century technique for food control: electronic noses. Anal. Chim. Acta 638(1), 1–15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jha, S.N., Jaiswal, P., Grewal, M.K., Gupta, M., Bhardwaj, R.: Detection of adulterants and contaminants in liquid foods-a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 56, 1662–1684 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Banerjee, R., Tudu, B., Bandyopadhyay, R., Bhattacharyya, N.: A review on combined odor and taste sensor systems. J. Food Eng. 190, 10–21 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Volpentesta, A.P.: A framework for human interaction with mobiquitous services in a smart environment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50, 177–185 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bi, Y., Lv, M., Song, C., Xu, W., Guan, N., Yi, W.: AutoDietary: AWearable acoustic sensor system for food intake recognition in daily life. IEEE Sens. J. 16, 806–816 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimmermann, A., Lorenz, A., Oppermann, R.: An operational definition of context. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D.C., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Vieu, L. (eds.) CONTEXT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4635, pp. 558–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74255-5_42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, B., Ceusters, W.: Aboutness: towards foundations for the Information Artifact Ontology. In: ICBO (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management EngineeringUniversity of CalabriaArcavacata di Rende (CS)Italy

Personalised recommendations