Light Metals 2013 pp 1183-1188 | Cite as

Relationships between Coke Properties and Anode Properties — Round Robin 19

  • Lorentz Petter Lossius
  • Marvin Lubin
  • Les Edwards
  • Julien Wyss
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

This paper discusses the preparation and production of bench scale and pilot scale anodes with five different calcined coke samples prepared for a world-wide calcined coke round robin (RR). A key objective of the RR and anode testing was to look for relationships between calcined coke properties and anode properties, particularly coke bulk density/apparent density results and anode densities. The calcined coke RR was the 19th organized by Rain CII Carbon, but this time it was a collaborative effort with Hydro Aluminium and R&D Carbon. Calcined coke results for RR19 are discussed in greater detail in another paper in these proceedings. Bench scale anodes with the five cokes were prepared at R&D Carbon and used to select optimum pitch levels for production of pilot scale anodes. This is the first time a RR with such a broad scope has been coordinated and published and it has provided some useful data for the industry.

Keywords

Calcined Coke Bulk Density 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Edwards, N. Backhouse, H. Darmstadt, M-J Dion, “Evolution of Anode Grade Coke Quality”, Light Metals, 2012, 1207–1211Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Panchal, M. Wyborney and J. Rolle, “Historical and Future Challenges with the Vibrated Bulk Density Test Methods for Determining Porosity of Calcined Coke”, Light Metals, 2011, 925–930Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M-J Dion, H. Darmstadt, N. Backhouse, F. Cannova and M. Canada, “Prediction of Calcined Coke Bulk Density”, Light Metals, 2011, 931–936Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Cannova, M. Canada and B. Vitchus, “Calcined Coke Particle Size and Crushing Steps Affect its VBD Result”, Light Metals, 2011, 937–939Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.P. Lossius, B. Spencer, H. 0ye, “Bulk Density – Overview of ASTM and ISO Methods and Examples of Between Laboratory Comparisions”, Light Metals, 2011,941–946Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Edwards, M. Lubin, J. Marino, “Improving the Repeatability of Coke Bulk Density Testing”, Light Metals, 2011, 947–952Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Laplante and L. Duchesneau, “ATSM D7454 Vibrated Bulk Density Method – Principal and Limitations”, Light Metals, 2011, 953–957Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Spencer, L. Johnsen, D. Kirkpatrick, D. Clark and M. Baudino, “Vibrated Bulk Density (VBD) of Calcined Petroleum Coke and Implications of Changes in the ASTM Method D4292”, Light Metals, 2011, 959–963Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Lubin, L. Edwards and L. P. Lossius, “Calcined Coke Round Robin 19”, Light Metals, 2013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. M. Odok and W. K. Fischer, “Application of Pilot Plant work in Prebaked Anode Manufacturing”, Light Metals, 1978, Vol.1, 269–286Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U. Bühler and R. C. Perruchoud, “Dynamic Process Optimisation”, Light Metals, 1995, 707–714Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.J. Akhtar and M. W. Meier, “Dynamic Process Optimization in Paste Plant” Light Metals, 2006, 571–575Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.P. Lossius et al, “Pilot Scale Anodes for Raw Material Evaluation and Process Improvement”, Light Metals, 2013Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Gavin, W. Marcrum, A. Weber, L. Crabtree, L. Edwards, “Impact of Higher Vanadium Levels on Smelter Operations”, Light Metals, 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorentz Petter Lossius
    • 1
  • Marvin Lubin
    • 2
  • Les Edwards
    • 2
  • Julien Wyss
    • 3
  1. 1.Norsk Hydro ASAØvre ÅrdalNorway
  2. 2.Rain CII CarbonKingwoodUSA
  3. 3.R&D CarbonSierreSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations