Skip to main content

Toward Sustainable Rivers and Water Resources

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science ((BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL))

Abstract

The previous chapter reviewed a long list of human activities that have directly and indirectly altered process and form in river ecosystems, with an associated loss of ecosystem services. Management in many river basins now focuses on trying to restore some balance between existing, typically consumptive or homogenizing uses of river resources versus restoration of diversity, sustainability, and river ecosystem health. None of the latter three terms is easy to define. Diversity refers to variety but, as discussed in Chap. 2, there are multiple ways to define physical or biotic diversity and no particular metric is consistently better in all situations or for all purposes. Sustainability in an ecological context typically refers to the ability of ecosystems to remain diverse and productive. In a physical context, sustainability may refer to the ability of a system to continue functioning or providing natural resources. River health also has multiple potential definitions. Even using the relatively simple definition in Chap. 1, that river health is the degree to which a river ecosystem matches natural conditions, requires understanding natural conditions. On the one hand, use and understanding of words matters and people may use similar words but have different objectives or desired outcomes. On the other hand, diversity, sustainability, and river health are now widely used and there is at least broad consensus on the meaning of these words. So, what is being done to protect and restore river corridors? This chapter reviews the development of river restoration during the latter twentieth century and early twenty-first century; discusses particular concepts used in restoration; and presents specific examples of watershed-scale restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbe T, Brooks A (2011) Geomorphic, engineering and ecological considerations when using wood in river restoration. In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. American Geophysical Union Press, Washington, pp 419–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews ED, Nankervis JM (1995) Effective discharge and the design of channel maintenance flows for gravel-bed rivers. In: Costa JE et al (eds) Natural and anthropogenic influences in fluvial geomorphology. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 151–164

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D (2014) Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energ Policy 69:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Pusey BJ (2003) Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers. River Res Appl 19:377–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16(4):1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker ME, Weller DE, Jordan TE (2006) Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient interception by riparian buffers. Landsc Ecol 21:1327–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balana BB, Vinten A, Slee B (2011) A review on cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: key issues, methods, and applications. Ecol Econ 70:1021–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek AT (2001) Undamming rivers: a review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environ Manag 27:803–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM (2010) Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. Bioscience 60:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellmore JR, Baxter CV (2014) Effects of geomorphic process domains on river ecosystems: a comparison of floodplain and confined valley segments. River Res Appl 30:617–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA (2011) River restoration—the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse watershed-scale degradation. Ecol Appl 21:1926–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, and the National River Restoration Science Synthesis Working Group (2005) Restoration of U.S. rivers: a national synthesis. Science 308:636–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES et al (2007) Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restor Ecol 15:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloesch J, Sieber U (2003) The morphological destruction and subsequent restoration programmes of large rivers in Europe. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 147:363–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Botterweg T, Rodda DW (1999) Danube River basin: progress with the environmental programme. Water Sci Technol 40:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AJ (1999) An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshw Biol 41:469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovee KD, Milhous R (1978) Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: theory and techniques. Instream Flow Information Paper no. 5, FWS/OBS-78/33, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Brierley GJ, Fryirs K (2000) River styles, a geomorphic approach to catchment characterization: implications for river rehabilitation in Bega catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Environ Manag 25:661–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (2005) Geomorphology and river management: applications of the river styles framework. Blackwell, Oxford, p 398

    Google Scholar 

  • Brierley G, Fryirs K (2009) Don’t fight the site: three geomorphic considerations in catchment-scale river rehabilitation planning. Environ Manag 43:1201–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (2016) The use of evolutionary trajectories to guide ‘moving targets’ in the management of river futures. River Res Appl 32:823–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley GJ, Brooks AP, Fryirs K, Taylor MP (2005) Did humid-temperate rivers in the Old and New Worlds respond differently to clearance of riparian vegetation and removal of woody debris? Prog Phys Geogr 29:27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes A (1990) Restoration and enhancement of engineered river channels: some European experiences. Regul Rivers Res Manag 5:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks AP, Brierley GJ (1997) Geomorphic responses of lower Bega River to catchment disturbance, 1851-1926. Geomorphology 18:291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks AP, Howell T, Abbe TB, Arthington AH (2006) Confronting hysteresis: wood based river rehabilitation in highly altered riverine landscapes of south-eastern Australia. Geomorphology 79:395–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CA, Joubert A (2003) Using multicriteria analysis to develop environmental flow scenarios for rivers targeted for water resource development. Water SA 29:365–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch MJ, Dudycha DJ (2004) Linking conceptual and simulation models of the Cooum River: collaborative development of a GIS-based DSS for environmental management. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Davies PM, Mosisch TD (1999) Ecosystem measures of river health and their response to riparian and catchment degradation. Freshw Biol 41:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Reclamation (US) (2016) Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program: Balancing Resource Use and Conservation, Boulder City, NV. http://www.coloradoriverrecovery.org/

  • Campana D, Marchese E, Theule JI, Comiti F (2014) Channel degradation and restoration of an Alpine river and related morphological changes. Geomorphology 221:230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin A, Daniels MD, Urban MA, Piegay H, Gregory KJ, Bigler W, Butt AZ, Grable JL, Gregory SV, Lafrenz M, Laurencio LR, Wohl E (2008) Perceptions of wood in rivers and challenges for stream restoration in the United States. Environ Manag 41:893–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin A et al (2009) Linking theory and practice for restoration of step-pool streams. Environ Manag 43:645–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin A, Laurencio LR, Daniels MD, Wohl E, Urban MA, Boyer KL, Butt A, Piegay H, Gregory KJ (2014) The significance of perceptions and feedbacks for effectively managing wood in rivers. River Res Appl 30:98–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford NJ (2012) River restoration: widening perspectives. In: Church M, Biron P, Roy A (eds) Gravel-bed rivers: processes, tools, and environments. Wiley, Chichester, pp 150–159

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MJ, Henges-Jeck C, Castillo-Moreno G (2001) A preliminary water balance for the Colorado River delta, 1992-1998. J Arid Environ 49:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins BD, Montgomery DR, Haas AD (2002) Historical changes in the distribution and functions of large wood in Puget Lowland rivers. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comiti F, Mao L, Lenzi A, Siligardi M (2009) Artificial steps to stabilize mountain rivers: a post-project ecological assessment. River Res Appl 25:639–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East AE et al (2015) Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: river channel and floodplain geomorphic change. Geomorphology 228:765–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden S, Bear C (2011) Reading the river through ‘watercraft’: environmental engagement through knowledge and practice in freshwater angling. Cult Geogr 18:297–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden S, Tunstall SM (2006) Ecological versus social restoration? How urban river restoration challenges but also fails to challenge the science-policy nexus in the United Kingdom. Environ Plann C 24:661–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden S, Tunstall SM, Tapsell SM (2000) Translating nature: river restoration as nature-culture. Environ Plann D 18:257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elosegi A, Diez J, Mutz M (2010) Effects of hydromorphological integrity on biodiversity and functioning of river ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 657:199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estevez E, Rodriguez-Castillo T, Alvarez-Cabria M, Penas FJ, Gonzalez-Ferreras AM, Lezcano M, Barquin J (2017) Analysis of structural and functional indicators for assessing the health state of mountain streams. Ecol Indic 72:553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1999) State of environment indicators of ‘river health’: exploring the metaphor. Freshw Biol 41:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Bestgen KR (1997) Ecology of fishes indigenous to the central and southwestern Great Plains. In: Knopf FL, Sampson FB (eds) Ecology and conservation of great plains vertebrates. Springer, New York, pp 131–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Finer M, Jenkins CN (2012) Proliferation of hydroelectric dams in the Andean Amazon and implications for Andes-Amazon connectivity. PLoS One 7:e35126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flessa KW, Glenn EP, Hinojosa-Huerta O, de le Parra-Renteria CA, Ramirez-Hernandez J, Schmidt JC, Zamora-Aroyo FA (2013) Flooding the Colorado River delta: a landscape-scale experiment. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 94:485–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florsheim JL, Mount JF (2002) Restoration of floodplain topography by sand-splay complex formation in response to intentional levee breaches, lower Cosumnes River, California. Geomorphology 44:67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JM, Lee VJ (2002) Extreme floods, channel change, and riparian forests along ephemeral streams. Ecol Monogr 72:409–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frothingham KM, Rhoads BL, Herricks EE (2002) A multiscale conceptual framework for integrated ecogeomorphological research to support stream naturalization in the agricultural Midwest. Environ Manag 29:16–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryirs K, Brierley GJ (2001) Variability in sediment delivery and storage along river courses in Bega catchment, NSW, Australia: implications for geomorphic river recovery. Geomorphology 38:237–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryirs K, Brierley GJ (2009) Naturalness and place in river rehabilitation. Ecol Soc 14:20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss1/art20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galat DL, Fredrickson LH, Humburg DD, Bataille KJ, Bodie JR et al (1998) Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. Bioscience 48:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale CB, Keegan CE, Berg EC, Daniels J, Christensen GA, Sorenson CB, Morgan TA, Polzin P (2012) Oregon’s forest products industry and timber harvest, 2008: industry trends and impacts of the Great Recession through 2010. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-868, Portland, OR, p 55

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Vogel RM, Kroll CN, Poff NL, Olden JD (2009) Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. J Hydrol 374:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Spicer JI (2004) Biodiversity: an introduction, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Hoboken, p 191

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn EP, Flessa KW, Pitt J (2013) Restoration potential of the aquatic ecosystems of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico: introduction to special issue on “Wetlands of the Colorado River Delta.”. Ecol Eng 59:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant (2001) Dam removal: panacea or Pandora for rivers? Hydrol Process 15:1531–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM (eds) (2003) Ecology and management of wood in world rivers. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg NS (2016) Integrated water management: an interdisciplinary approach. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumiero B, Mant J, Hein T, Elso J, Boz B (2013) Linking the restoration of rivers and riparian zones/wetlands in Europe: sharing knowledge through case studies. Ecol Eng 56:36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell A, Tockner K, Edwards P, Petts G (2005) Effects of deposited wood on biocomplexity of river corridors. Front Ecol Environ 3:377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JH, Silveira R (1999) Large-scale assessments of river health using an index of biotic integrity with low-diversity fish communities. Freshw Biol 41:235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam SM (1994) River pollution: an ecological perspective. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer FR, Locke H, Dreitz VJ, Hebblewhite M, Lowe WH, Muhlfeld CC, Nelson CR, Proctor MF, Rood SB (2016) Gravel-bed river floodplains are the ecological nexus of glaciated mountain landscapes. Sci Adv 2:e1600026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester ET, Gooseff MN (2011) Hyporheic restoration in streams and rivers. In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. American Geophysical Union Press, Washington, pp 167–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickford MJH, Schiel DR (2014) Experimental rehabilitation of degraded spawning habitat of a diadromous fish, Galaxias maculatus (Jenyns, 1842) in rural and urban streams. Restor Ecol 22:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highlights (2016) 2015-2016 highlights, upper Colorado endangered fish recovery program. US Department of Interior, Washington. http://www.coloradoriverrecovery.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilmes MM, Wohl EE (1995) Changes in channel morphology associated with placer mining. Phys Geogr 16:223–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohensinner S, Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Habersack H (2005) Historical analyses: a foundation for developing and evaluating river-type specific restoration programs. Int J River Basin Manag 3:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes FMR, Rood SB (2003) Allocation of river flows for restoration of floodplain forest ecosystems: a review of approaches and their applicability in Europe. Environ Manag 32:12–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes FMR, Adams WM, Muller E, Nilsson C, Richards KS, Barsoum N, Decamps H, Foussadier R, Girel J, Guilloy H, Hayes A, Johansson M, Lamb L, Pautou G, Peiry JL, Perrow M, Vautier F, Winfield M (2001) The importance of different scale processes for the restoration of floodplain woodlands. Regul River Res Manag 17:325–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James LA (2013) Legacy sediment: definitions and processes of episodically produced anthropogenic sediment. Anthropocene 2:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail J, Hering D, Muhar S, Gerhard M, Preis S (2007) The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria. J Appl Ecol 44:1145–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1991) Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol Appl 1:66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1999) Defining and measuring river health. Freshw Biol 41:221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J, Brown C (2010) Integrated basin flow assessments: concepts and method development in Africa and south-east Asia. Freshw Biol 55:127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JM, Brown CA, Sabet H (2003) A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for regulated rivers. River Res Appl 19:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J, Beuster H, Brown C, Joubert A (2014) Pro-active management: the role of environmental flows in transboundary cooperative planning for the Okavango River system. Hydrol Sci J 59:786–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klösch M, Hornich R, Baumann N, Puchner G, Habersack H (2011) Mitigating channel incision via sediment input and self-initiated riverbank erosion at the Mur River, Austria. In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. American Geophysical Union Press, Washington, pp 319–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Koebel JW (1995) An historical perspective on the Kissimmee River restoration project. Restor Ecol 3:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koebel JW, Bousquin SG (2014) The Kissimmee River restoration project and evaluation program, Florida, USA. Restor Ecol 22:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM (1996) A cross section of stream channel restoration. J Soil Water Conserv 51:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM (2006) River restoration and meanders. Ecol Soc 11(2):42. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/isse/art42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM (2011) Setting goals in river restoration: when and where can the river ‘heal itself’? In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. American Geophysical Union Press, Washington, pp 29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM, Smeltzer MM, Railsback SF (2001) Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream. Environ Manag 28:761–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM, Boulton AJ, O’Daniel S, Poole GC, Rahel FJ, Stanley EH, Wohl E et al (2006) Process-based ecological river restoration: visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecol Soc 11(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM, Rubin ZK, Minear JT (2014) Dams on the Mekong: cumulative sediment starvation. Water Resour Res 50:5158–5169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CP, Black RW, Voss F, Neale CMU (2008) Integrating remotely acquired and field data to assess effects of setback levees on riparian and aquatic habitats in glacial-melt water rivers. River Res Appl 24:355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CP, Olden JD, Lytle DA, Melis TS, Schmidt JC et al (2011) Large-scale flow experiments for managing river systems. Bioscience 61:948–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak JP, Bennett MG, Piazza BB, Remo JWF (2016) Towards dynamic flow regime management for floodplain restoration in the Atchafalaya River basin, Louisiana. Environ Sci Policy 64:118–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen EA, Kronvang B, Wiberg-Larsen P, Thodsen H, Nielsen C, Amor E, Friberg N, Pedersen ML, Baattrup-Pedersen A (2014) 10 years after the largest river restoration project in northern Europe: hydromorphological changes on multiple scales in River Skjern. Ecol Eng 66:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave R, Robertson MM, Doyle MW (2008) Why you should pay attention to stream mitigation banking. Ecol Restor 26:287–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1949) A sand county Almanac. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepori F, Palm D, Brannas E, Malmqvist B (2005) Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol Appl 15:2060–2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester RE, Boulton AJ (2008) Rehabilitating agricultural streams in Australia with wood: a review. Environ Manag 42:310–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz AW, Jahnig SC, Hering D (2009) Re-meandering German lowland streams: qualitative and quantitative effects of restoration measures on hydromorphology and macroinvertebrates. Environ Manag 44:745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddock I (1999) The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshw Biol 41:373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major JJ et al (2012) Geomorphic response of the Sandy River, Oregon, to removal of Marmot Dam. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1792, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks CO, Nislow KH, Magilligan FJ (2014) Quantifying flooding regime in floodplain forests to guide river restoration. Elementa Science Anthropocene 2:31. doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massong TM, Montgomery DR (2000) Influence of sediment supply, lithology, and wood debris on the distribution of bedrock and alluvial channels. Geol Soc Am Bull 112:591–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May CL, Gresswell RE (2003) Processes and rates of sediment and wood accumulation in headwater streams of the Oregon Coast Range, USA. Earth Surf Process Landf 28:409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald A, Lane SN, Haycock NE, Chalk EA (2004) Rivers of dreams: on the gulf between theoretical and practical aspects of an upland river restoration. Trans Inst Brit Geogr 29:257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melis TS (ed) (2011) Effects of three high-flow experiments on the Colorado River ecosystem downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1366, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt DM, Scott ML, Poff NL, Auble GT, Lytle DA (2010) Theory, methods and tools for determining environmental flows for riparian vegetation: Riparian vegetation-flow response guilds. Freshw Biol 55(1):206–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritts D, Walter R, Rahnis M, Cox S, Hartranft J, Scheid C, Potter N et al (2013) The rise and fall of Mid-Atlantic streams: millpond sedimentation, milldam breaching, channel incision, and stream bank erosion. In: DeGraff JV, Evans JE (eds) The challenges of dam removal and river restoration. Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology XXI, Boulder, pp 183–203

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moritsch S (2017) Influence on the riparian vegetation as a geomorphic quality unit at restored and degraded stretches of a highly dynamic river in South Tyrol. MS thesis, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller ER, Grams PE, Schmidt JC, Hazel JE, Alexander JS, Kaplinski M (2014) The influence of controlled floods on fine sediment storage in debris fan-affected canyons of the Colorado River basin. Geomorphology 226:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller ER, Schmidt JC, Topping DJ, Shafroth PB, Rodriguez-Burgueno JE, Ramirez-Hernandez J, Grams PE (2016) Geomorphic change and sediment transport during a small artificial flood in a transformed post-dam delta: the Colorado River delta, United States and Mexico. Ecological Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Muotka T, Laasonen P (2002) Ecosystem recovery in restored headwater streams: the role of enhanced leaf retention. J Appl Ecol 39:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mürle U, Ortlepp J, Zahner M (2003) Effects of experimental flooding on riverine morphology, structure and riparian vegetation: the River Spöl, Swiss National Park. Aquat Sci 65:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtnebel H-P (2000) The Danube River basin environmental programme: plans and actions for a basin wide approach. Water Policy 2:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura K, Tockner K, Amano K (2006) River and wetland restoration: lessons from Japan. Bioscience 56:419–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura F, Ishiyama N, Sueyoshi M, Negishi JN, Akasaka T (2014) The significance of meander restoration for the hydrogeomorphology and recovery of wetland organisms in the Kushiro River, a lowland river in Japan. Restor Ecol 22:544–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson SM, Fielding EJ, Zamora-Arroyo F, Flessa K (2013) Delta dynamics: effects of a major earthquake, tides, and river flows on Cienaga de Santa Clara and the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Ecol Eng 59:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newson MD, Large ARG (2006) ‘Natural’ rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality’ and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surf Process Landf 31:1606–1624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RH, Thoms MC (1999) What is river health? Freshw Biol 41:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2004) Endangered and threatened species of the Platte River. National Research Council Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor JE, Duda JJ, Grant GE (2015) 1000 dams and counting. Science 348:496–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opperman JJ, Luster R, McKenney BA, Roberts M, Meadows AW (2010) Ecologically functional floodplains: connectivity, flow regime, and scale. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46:211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortlepp J, Murle U (2003) Effects of experimental flooding on brown trout (Salmo trutta fario L.): the River Spöl, Swiss National Park. Aquat Sci 65:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paish O (2002) Small hydro power: technology and current status. Renew Sust Energ Rev 6:537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Febria CM (2012) The heartbeat of ecosystems. Science 336:1393–1394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Hondula KL (2014) Restoration as mitigation: analysis of stream mitigation for coal mining impacts in southern Appalachia. Environ Sci Technol 48:10552–10560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S et al (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Allan JD, Meyer J, Bernhardt ES (2007) River restoration in the twenty-first century: data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restor Ecol 15:472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Schlesinger WH, Eshleman KN, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Hendryx MS, Lemly AD, Likens GE, Loucks OL, Power ME, White PS, Wilcock PR (2010a) Mountaintop mining consequences. Science 327:148–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Menninger HL, Bernhardt E (2010b) River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshw Biol 55:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Filoso S, Fanelli RM (2014) From ecosystems to ecosystem services: stream restoration as ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 65:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack GB (2013) A geomorphologist’s guide to participating in river rehabilitation. In: Wohl E (ed) Treatise on fluvial geomorphology. Treatise on geomorphology, vol 9. Academic, San Diego, pp 843–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen ML, Andersen JM, Nielsen K, Linnemann M (2007) Restoration of Skern River and its valley: project description and general ecological changes in the project area. Ecol Eng 30:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkovska V, Urbanic G, Mikos M (2015) Variety of the guiding image of rivers—defined for ecologically relevant habitat features at the meeting of the alpine, Mediterranean, lowland and karst regions. Ecol Eng 81:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit NE, Naiman RJ (2006) Flood-deposited wood creates regeneration niches for riparian vegetation on a semi-arid South African river. J Veg Sci 17:615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfadenhauer J (2001) Some remarks on the socio-cultural background of restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 9:220–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitlick J, Wilcock PR (2001) Relations between streamflow, sediment transport, and aquatic habitat in regulated rivers. In: Dorava JM et al (eds) Geomorphic processes and riverine habitat. American Geophysical Union Press, Washington, pp 185–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzuto J, O’Neal M (2009) Increased mid-twentieth century riverbank erosion rates related to the demise of mill dams, South River, Virginia. Geology 37:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55:194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock MM, Lewallen G, Woodruff K, Jordan CE, Castro JM (eds) (2015) The beaver restoration guidebook: working with beavers to restore streams, wetlands, and floodplains, v. 1.0. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, p 189

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathburn SL, Merritt DM, Wohl EE, Sanderson JS, Knight HAL (2009) Characterizing environmental flows for maintenance of river ecosystems: North Fork Cache la Poudre River, Colorado. In: James LA, Rathburn SL, Whittecar GR (eds) Management and Restoration of Fluvial Systems with Broad Historical Changes and Human Impacts. Geological Society of America Special Paper 451, Boulder, Colorado, pp 143–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads BL, Herricks EE (1996) Naturalization of headwater streams in Illinois: challenges and possibilities. In: Brookes A, Shields FD (eds) River channel restoration: guiding principles for sustainable projects. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 331–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes HM, Closs GP, Townsend CR (2007) Stream ecosystem health outcomes of providing information to farmers and adoption of best management practices. J Appl Ecol 44:1106–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Baumgartner J, Powell J, Braun D (1996) A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10:1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Mathews R, Harrison DL, Wigington R (2003) Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecol Appl 13:206–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson BJ, Mitchell BD (2010) Metastability in a river subject to multiple disturbances may constrain restoration options. Mar Freshw Res 61:778–785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers KH (2006) The real river management challenge: integrating scientists, stakeholders and service agencies. River Res Appl 22:269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roley SS, Tank JL, Stephen ML, Johnson LT, Beaulieu JJ, Witter JD (2012) Floodplain restoration enhances denitrification and reach-scale nitrogen removal in an agricultural stream. Ecol Appl 22:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy EA (2017) New Zealand river granted same legal rights as human being. The Guardian, 26 March 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/16/new-zealand-river-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-being. Accessed 23 May 2017

  • Rubin DM, Nelson JM, Topping DJ (1998) Relation of inversely graded deposits to suspended-sediment grain-size evolution during the 1996 flood experiment in Grand Canyon. Geology 26:99–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson JS, Rowan N, Wilding T, Bledsoe BP, Miller WJ, Poff NL (2012) Getting to scale with environmental flow assessment: the watershed flow evaluation tool. River Res Appl 28:1369–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk ER, Hupp CR (2009) Legacy effects of colonial millponds on floodplain sedimentation, bank erosion, and channel morphology, Mid-Atlantic, USA. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45:597–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JC, Wilcock PR (2008) Metrics for assessing the downstream effects of dams. Water Resour Res 44:W04404. doi:10.1029/2006WR005092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sear DA (1994) River restoration and geomorphology. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 4:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendzimir J, Magnuszewski P, Balogh P, Vari A (2007) Anticipatory modeling of biocomplexity in the Tisza River basin: first steps to establish a participatory adaptive framework. Environ Model Softw 22:599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafroth PB, Wilcox AC, Lytle DA, Hickey JT, Andersen DC, Beauchamp VB, Hautzinger A, McMullen LE, Warner A (2010) Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river. Freshw Biol 55:68–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields FJ, Knight SS, Lizotte R, Wren DG (2011) Connectivity and variability: metrics for riverine floodplain backwater rehabilitation. In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. American Geophysical Union Press, Washington, pp 233–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CB (2011) Adaptive management on the central Platte River—science, engineering and decision analysis to assist in the recovery of four species. J Environ Manag 92:1414–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerwerk N, Bloesch J, Paunovic M, Baumgartner C, Venohr M, Schneider-Jacoby M, Hein T, Tockner K (2010) Managing the world’s most international river: the Danube River basin. Mar Freshw Res 61:736–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souchon Y, Sabaton C, Deibel R, Reiser D, Kershner J, Gard M, Katopodis C, Leonard P, Poff NL, Miller WJ, Lamb BL (2008) Detecting biological responses to flow management: missed opportunities; future directions. River Res Appl 24:506–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker C, Lamb BL, Henriksen J, Bovee K, Bartholow J (1995) The instream flow incremental methodology: a primer for IFIM. National Biological Service, US Department of the Interior, Biological Report no. 29, Fort Collins, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford JA, Ward JV, Liss WJ, Frissell CA, Williams RN, Lichatowich JA, Coutant CC (1996) A general protocol for the restoration of regulated rivers. Regul Rivers Res Manag 12:391–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley EH, Doyle MW (2003) Trading off: the ecological effects of dam removal. Front Ecol Environ 1:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes G (1937) The Colorado Delta. American Geographical Society Special Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DM (2013) The quest for the golden trout: environmental loss and America’s iconic fish. University Press of New England, Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  • Tockner K, Schiemer F, Baumgartner C, Kum G, Weigand E, Zweimuller I, Ward JV (1999) The Danube restoration project: Species diversity patterns across connectivity gradients in the floodplain system. Regul Rivers Res Manag 15:245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth LA, Obeysekera JTB, Perkins WA, Loftin MK (1993) Flow regulation and restoration of Florida’s Kissimmee River. Regul Rivers Res Manag 8:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Scarsbrook MR, Dolédec S (1997) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis, refugia, and biodiversity in streams. Limnol Oceanogr 42:938–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of Reclamation (2016) National large wood manual: assessment, planning, design, and maintenance of large wood in fluvial ecosystems: restoring process, function and structure. Bureau of Reclamation and Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, p 628

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderpoorten A, Durwael L (1999) Trophic response curves of aquatic bryophytes in lowland calcareous streams. Bryologist 102:720–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaak HJ, Kusakana K, Koko SP (2014) Status of micro-hydrokinetic river technology in rural applications: a review of literature. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29:625–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violin CR, Cada P, Sudduth EB, Hassett BA, Penrose DL, Bernhardt ES (2011) Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems. Ecol Appl 21:1932–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade RJ, Rhoads BL, Rodriguez J, Daniels M, Wilson D, Herricks EE, Bombardelli F, Garcia M, Schwartz J (2002) Integrating science and technology to support stream naturalization near Chicago, Illinois. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38:931–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter RC, Merritts DJ (2008) Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science 319:299–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Malard F (2001) Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regul Rivers Res Manag 17:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warne AG, Toth LA, White WA (2000) Drainage-basin-scale geomorphic analysis to determine reference conditions for ecologic restoration—Kissimmee River, Florida. Geol Soc Am Bull 112:884–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Annex to Document A/42/427—Development and International Co-operation: Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissmann HZ, Könitzer C, Bertiller A (2009) Strukturen der Fliessgewässer in der Schweiz. BAFU (Bundesamt für Umwelt), Bern, Switzerland. [in German]

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller DE, Baker ME (2014) Cropland riparian buffers throughout Chesapeake Bay watershed: Spatial patterns and effects on nitrate loads delivered to streams. J Am Water Resour Assoc 50:696–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiele SM, Wilcock PR, Grams PE (2007) Reach-averaged sediment routing model of a canyon river. Water Resour Res 43:W02425. doi:10.1029/2005WR004824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox AC, O’Connor JE, Major JJ (2014) Rapid reservoir erosion, hyperconcentrated flow, and downstream deposition triggered by breaching of 38 m tall Condit Dam, White Salmon River, Washington. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 119:1376–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2004) Disconnected rivers: linking rivers to landscapes. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2011) A world of rivers: environmental change on ten of the world’s great rivers. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2012) Identifying and mitigating dam-induced declines in river health: three case studies from the western United States. Int J Sed Res 27:271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2013) Wide rivers crossed: the South Platte and the Illinois of the American Prairie. University Press of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2014) A legacy of absence: wood removal in U.S. rivers. Prog Phys Geogr 38:637–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2015) Legacy effects on sediments in river corridors. Earth Sci Rev 147:30–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2017) Bridging the gaps: an overview of wood across time and space in diverse rivers. Geomorphology 279:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Angermeier PL, Bledsoe B, Kondolf GM, MacDonnell L, Merritt DM, Palmer MA, Poff NL, Tarboton D (2005) River restoration. Water Resour Res 41:W10301. doi:10.1029/2005WR003985

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Bledsoe BP, Jacobson RB, Poff NL, Rathburn SL, Walters DM, Wilcox AC (2015a) The natural sediment regime in rivers: broadening the foundation for ecosystem management. Bioscience 65:358–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Lane SN, Wilcox AC (2015b) The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resour Res 51:5974–5997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaning C, Qiang W, Weihong L, Xiao R, Yapeng C, Lihua Z (2006) Rational groundwater table indicated by the eco-physiological parameters of the vegetation: a case study of ecological restoration in the lower reaches of the Tarim River. Chin Sci Bull 51:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora HA, Nelson SM, Flessa KW, Nomura R (2013) Post-dam sediment dynamics and processes in the Colorado River estuary: implications for habitat restoration. Ecol Eng 59:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Mitsch WJ (2007) Sediment chemistry and nutrient influx in a hydrologically restored bottomland hardwood forest in midwestern USA. River Res Appl 23:1026–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wohl, E. (2018). Toward Sustainable Rivers and Water Resources. In: Sustaining River Ecosystems and Water Resources. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65124-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics