Skip to main content

Outlook: Girlhood, Agency, and Embodied Space for Action

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nordic Girlhoods

Abstract

The sexual double standard and the realities of sexual violence have a significant impact on the embodied freedoms of girls and young women, as shown in Chaps. 5 and 6. The work of both Aaltonen and Honkasalo reveals ongoing challenges for feminists seeking to conceptualize the ambiguous balance of girls’ agency, particularly sexual agency, as it is lived. There may be, however, untapped potential in further working with the concepts of embodied space for action and situated agency, employing both alongside an intersectional perspective that pays attention to how a hierarchy of worth situates girls in relation to each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beauvoir, S. de [1949] (2011). The second sex. Trans. C. Borde, C. and S. Malovany-Chevallier. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convery, A. 2006. No victims, no oppression: Feminist theory and the denial of victimhood. Paper presented at the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coy, M. (2009). Milkshakes, lady lumps and growing up to want boobies: How the sexualisation of popular culture limits girls’ horizons. Child Abuse Review, 18(6), 372–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coy, M., & Garner, M. (2012). Definitions, discourses and dilemmas: Policy and academic engagement with the sexualisation of popular culture. Gender and Education, 24(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (2012). Beyond “empowerment”? Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 718–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Love, & Paul Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffner, S. (2000, May). Different space for action: The everyday meaning of young people’s perception of rape. Presentation at ESS Faculty Seminar, University of North London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2002). Journeys of Jeopardy: A commentary on current research on trafficking of women and children for sexual exploitation within Europe. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2003). The wrong debate: Reflections on why force is not the key issue with respect to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation. Feminist Review, 73, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, E. (1998). The hand that strikes and comforts: Gender construction and the tension between body and symbol. In R. E. Dobash & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 169–196). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (2004). Agency and experience: Gender as a lived relation. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. [1945] (2002). Phenomenology of perception. Trans. Smith, C. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miriam, K. (2005). Stopping the traffic in women: Power, agency and abolition in feminist debates over Sex-Trafficking. Journal of Social Philosophy, 36(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp-Jeffs, N., Kelly, L., & Klein, R. (2017). Long journeys toward freedom: The relationship between coercive control and space for action—Measurement and emerging evidence. Violence Against Women. doi:10.1177/1077801216686199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavro, E. (2000). Re-Reading the second sex: Theorizing the situation. Feminist Theory, 1(2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Gray, F. (2016). Situating agency. Trouble and Strife. Available http://www.troubleandstrife.org/2016/05/situating-agency/.

  • Vera-Gray, F. (2017). Men’s intrusion, women’s embodiment: A critical analysis of street harassment. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Vera-Gray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vera-Gray, F. (2017). Outlook: Girlhood, Agency, and Embodied Space for Action. In: Formark, B., Mulari, H., Voipio, M. (eds) Nordic Girlhoods . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65118-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics