Skip to main content

Reconciling Climate Model/Data Discrepancies: The Case of the ‘Trees That Didn’t Bark’

Abstract

Estimates of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS)—the temperature with a doubling of CO2—usually are between 1.5 °C and 5 °C warming, with a mid-range/most likely value close to 3 °C. Notably, comparisons of simulations of temperature changes over the past millennium with paleoreconstructions of past temperatures tend to suggest an ECS value toward the lower end of the range closer to 2 °C, which deserves closer scrutiny. In this chapter, I review evidence that paleoreconstructions may selectively underestimate the cooling signal associated with large explosive volcanic eruptions of the past millennium, due to their reliance on tree-ring data from tree-line-proximal environments. Once large volcanic episodes are masked, these comparisons instead support a mid-range of ~3 °C of ECS. Regardless of the reason for the model/paleodata discrepancy, ECS estimates—I argue—should not rely on comparisons that include these episodes.

Keywords

  • Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS)
  • Past Millennium
  • Large Explosive Volcanic Eruptions
  • Dendrochronology
  • Missing Rings

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 7.1
Fig. 7.2
Fig. 7.3
Fig. 7.4

References

  • Ammann, Caspar M., and Eugene R. Wahl. 2007. The Importance of the Geophysical Context in Statistical Evaluations of Climate Reconstruction Procedures. Climatic Change 85 (1–2): 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9276-x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anchukaitis, Kevin J., Petra Breitenmoser, Keith R. Briffa, Agata Buchwal, Ulf Büntgen, Edward R. Cook, Rosanne D. D’Arrigo, et al. 2012. Tree Rings and Volcanic Cooling. Nature Geoscience 5: 836–837. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1645.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Andreae, Meinrat O., Chris D. Jones, and Peter M. Cox. 2005. Strong Present-Day Aerosol Cooling Implies a Hot Future. Nature 435 (7046): 1187–1191.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Büntgen, Ulf, Lukas Wacker, Kurt Nicolussi, Michael Sigl, Dominik Güttler, Willy Tegel, Paul J. Krusic, and Jan Esper. 2014. Extraterrestrial Confirmation of Tree-Ring Dating. Nature Climate Change 4: 404–405. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2240.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arrigo, Rosanne, Rob Wilson, and Gordon Jacoby. 2006. On the Long-Term Context for Late Twentieth Century Warming. Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres) 111: D03103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emile-Geay, J., R. Seager, M.A. Cane, E.C. Cook, and G.J. Jaug. 2008. Volcanoes and ENSO Over the Past Millennium. Journal of Climate 21: 3134–3148.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hegerl, Gabriele C., Thomas J. Crowley, William T. Hyde, and David J. Frame. 2006. Climate Sensitivity Constrained by Temperature Reconstructions over the Past Seven Centuries. Nature 440 (7087): 1029–1032. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04679.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, Eystein, Jonathan Overpeck, and Keith R. Briffa. 2007. Paleoclimate. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assesment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P.D., and M.E. Mann. 2004. Climate over Past Millennia. Reviews of Geophysics 42 (2): RG2002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003RG000143.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Knutti, Reto, and Gabriele C. Hegerl. 2008. The Equilibrium Sensitivity of the Earth’s Temperature to Radiation Changes. Nature Geoscience 1: 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo337.

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael E. 2014. False Hope: The Rate of Global Temperature Rise May Have Hit a Plateau, but a Climate Crisis Still Looms in the Near Future. Scientific American 310: 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0414-78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael E., Jose D. Fuentes, and Scott Rutherford. 2012a. Underestimation of Volcanic Cooling in Tree-Ring-Based Reconstructions of Hemispheric Temperatures. Nature Geoscience 5: 202–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1394.

  • ———. 2012b. Reply to ‘Tree-Rings and Volcanic Cooling’. Nature Geoscience 5 (12): 837–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael E., Scott Rutherford, Andrew Schurer, Simon F.B. Tett, and Jose D. Fuentes. 2013. Discrepancies Between the Modeled and Proxy-Reconstructed Response to Volcanic Forcing over the Past Millennium: Implications and Possible Mechanisms. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 118 (14): 7617–7627. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, R., R.A. Muller, R. Jacobsen, E. Muller, S. Perlmutter, et al. 2013. A New Estimate of the Average Earth Surface Land Temperature Spanning 1753–2011. Geoinfor Geostat: An Overview 1: 1. http://static.berkeleyearth.org/papers/Results:Paper-Berkeley-Earth.pdf

  • Rutherford, Scott, and Michael E. Mann. 2014. Missing Tree Rings and the AD 774-775 Radiocarbon Event. Nature Climate Change 26: 648–649.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schurer, Andrew P., Gabriele C. Hegerl, Michael E. Mann, Simon F.B. Tett, and Steven J. Phipps. 2013. Separating Forced from Chaotic Climate Variability over the Past Millennium. Journal of Climate 26 (18): 6954–6973. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00826.1.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mann, M.E. (2018). Reconciling Climate Model/Data Discrepancies: The Case of the ‘Trees That Didn’t Bark’. In: A. Lloyd, E., Winsberg, E. (eds) Climate Modelling. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65058-6_7

Download citation