Skip to main content

‘Profiles’ of Deportability: Analyzing Spanish Migration Control Policies from a Neocolonial Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Over the first decade of the twenty-first century, Spain was a popular destination for international migrations. Successive Spanish governments addressed this phenomenon through a set of sovereign measures, such as selective and racially biased policing, detention in internment centers and deportation. Some key aspects of these migration control policies have gradually changed throughout the last two decades. One of them is what may be called the ‘profile’ of the ‘deportable’ migrant. The analysis of the empirical data on the arrest, detention and deportation of migrants provides demographics of the targeted individuals and sheds light on the rationale underlying the migration control apparatus. Specifically, this paper examines the nationalities of individuals affected by the cycle of deportation to grasp the persistence of neocolonial power relations within current bordered penality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Eurostat data (European Commission 2016), on January 1, 2015 the foreign population rates of those countries were: France, 6.6 percent; UK, 8.4 percent; Italy, 8.2 percent and Greece, 7.6 percent. Nonwhite prison population rate in the UK was in 2014 approximately 25 percent (Institute of Race Relations 2016).

  2. 2.

    In the same vein, at least the cases of Argentina (5.6 percent of foreign prison population at the end of 2014, International Centre for Prison Studies n.d.a), Australia (19.7 percent of foreign-born prison population at midyear 2012, International Centre for Prison Studies n.d.b) and Brazil (0.4 percent of foreign prison population at year-end 2014, International Centre for Prison Studies n.d.c) should be mentioned, since in all of them the percentage of foreign or foreign-born correctional population is similar to or even lower than that of resident foreigners (See Cunneen 2006; Hogg 2001; Monclús Masó and Brandariz García 2015; Wacquant 2003).

  3. 3.

    59 percent of the US male prison population at year-end 2014 were either black (37 percent) or Hispanic (22 percent); in contrast, white accounted just for 32 percent of the male prison population (Bureau of Justice Statistics 2015).

  4. 4.

    In 2000 the foreign population rate in Spain was 2.3 percent and that of foreign-born population was 3.6 percent, while in 2010 they skyrocketed to 12.2 percent and 14.0 percent, respectively. In other words, over the first decade of the century more than 5.13 million foreign-born individuals migrated to Spain (Compiled by authors from data sourced from Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (INE)).

  5. 5.

    ‘Southern border’ is the term commonly used in Spain to designate the sea border between southern Spain and Morocco (which are separated by the Mediterranean Sea) and the Canary Islands and Morocco (separated by the Atlantic Ocean), as well as the terrestrial border among Morocco and the North Africa Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla.

  6. 6.

    Non-EU nationals accounted for the 15.6 percent of all criminal convictions in Spain in 2015, whereas their drug crimes conviction rate was 30.1 percent (Compiled by authors from data sourced from INE).

  7. 7.

    Spanish colonies in the Americas overall became independent nations or were annexed to other countries during the first quarter of the nineteenth century. The 1898 Spanish-American war led to the independence of Cuba and the cession of the Philippines, Puerto Rico and Guam to the USA. In 1956 Spain surrendered the Spanish protectorate in North Morocco to the newborn nation. In 1968 Equatorial Guinea gained independence from Spain, and in 1975 Western Sahara was invaded and seized by Morocco. Since then, only the enclave towns of Ceuta and Melilla remain in North Africa under Spanish sovereignty.

References

  • Aebi, M. F., Tiago, M. M., & Burkhardt, C. (2015). SPACE I—Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison Populations. Survey 2014. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbero González, I., & Fernández Bessa, C. (2013). Beyond surveillance: Racial profiled detention practices in everyday life. In C. William, R. Webster, G. Galdon Clavell, N. Zurawski, K. Boersma, B. Sāgvāri, et al. (Eds.), Living in Surveillance Societies: The State of Surveillance (pp. 295–304). Seattle: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodelón González, E. (2007). Mujer inmigrante y sistema penal en España: La construcción de la desigualdad de género en el sistema penal. In E. Almeda Samaranch & E. Bodelón González (Eds.), Mujeres y castigo: Un enfoque socio-jurídico y de género (pp. 105–132). Madrid: Dykinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, B. (2013). The borders of punishment: Towards a criminology of mobility. In K. Franko Aas & M. Bosworth (Eds.), The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion (pp. 291–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boza Martínez, D. (2016). La expulsion de personas extranjeras condenadas penalmente: El Nuevo artículo 89 CP. Cizur Menor: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B., García Añón, J., García Sáez, J. A., Gascón Cuenca, A., & Llorente Ferreres, A. (2013). Identificación policial por perfil étnico en España: Informe sobre experiencias y actitudes en relación con las actuaciones policiales. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandariz García, J. A. (2011). Sistema penal y control de los migrantes: Gramática del migrante como infractor penal. Granada: Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandariz García, J. A. (2016). Crimmigration policies and the Great Recession: Analysis of the Spanish case. In M. J. Guia, R. Koulish, & V. Mitsilegas (Eds.), Immigration Detention, Risk and Human Rights (pp. 185–197). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brandariz García, J. A., & Fernández Bessa, C. (2007). The managerial turn: The transformation of Spanish migration control policies since the onset of the economic crisis. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 56(2), 198–219. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/hojo.12201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calavita, K. (2005). Immigrants at the Margins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campesi, G. (2015). Polizia della frontera: Frontex e la produzione dello spazio europeo. Roma: DeriveApprodi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. (2006). Racism, discrimination and the over-representation of indigenous people in the criminal justice system: Some conceptual and explanatory issues. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 17(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daunis Rodríguez, A. (2009). El derecho penal como herramienta de la política migratoria. Granada: Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giorgi, A. (2015). Five theses on mass incarceration. Social Justice, 42(2), 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirección General de la Policia (2014) Circular 6/2014. Madrid: Ministerio del Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equipo Barañí. (2001). Mujeres gitanas y sistema penal. Madrid: Metyel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equipo Barañí. (2005). Mujeres gitanas y sistema penal. In J. L. Segovia et al. (Eds.), Las cárceles de la democracia: Del déficit de ciudadanía a la producción de control (pp. 165–179). Getafe: Bajo Cero.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016). Eurostat. Retrieved November 23, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/docs/communication_on_the_european_agenda_on_migration_en.pdf

  • Fekete, L. (2011). Accelerated removals: The human cost of EU deportation policies. Race & Class, 52(4), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396810396605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Bessa, C. (2013). Il panorama dei Centri di internamento per stranieri in Spagna: Dal controllo delle frontiere alla gestione della criminalità. Antigone, 8(1), 68–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Bessa, C. (2016). El dispositiu de deportació: Anàlisi criminològica de la detenció, internament i expulsió d’immigrants en el context espanyol. PhD thesis. Spain: University of Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Bessa, C., & Manavella Suárez, A. (2010). Controles migratorios en las fronteras euromediterráneas: Un análisis crítico desde la perspectiva de los derechos humanos. In C. Fernández Bessa, H. Silveira Gorski, G. Rodríguez Fernández, & I. Rivera Beiras (Eds.), Contornos bélicos del Estado securitario: Control de la vida y procesos de exclusión social (pp. 173–204). Barcelona: Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • García España, E. (2007). Extranjeros presos y reinserción: Un reto del siglo XXI. In A. I. Cerezo Domínguez & E. García España (Eds.), La prisión en España: Una perspectiva criminológica (pp. 101–134). Granada: Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • García España, E., Arenas García, L., & Miller, J. (2016). Identificaciones policiales y discriminación racial en España: Evaluación de un programa para su reducción. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golash-Boza, T. M. (2015). Deported: Immigrant Policing, Disposable Labor, and Global Capitalism. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • González-Enríquez, C. (2010). Spain: Irregularity as a rule. In A. Tryandafyllidou (Ed.), Irregular Migration in Europe: Myths and Realities (pp. 247–266). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Sánchez, I. (2014). La penalidad neoliberal: Aumento de presos y reconfiguración del Estado en España (1975–2008). PhD thesis. Spain: Complutense University of Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, M. (2015). Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, E. M., et al. (2012). The foreign-born population in the United States: 2010, US Census Bureau. Retrieved September 2017, from https://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/acs-19.pdf

  • Hogg, R. (2001). Penality and modes of regulating indigenous peoples in Australia. Punishment and Society, 3(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474501003003002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Race Relations. (2016). Statistics. Retrieved November 23, 2016, from www.irr.org.uk/research/statistics/

  • International Centre for Prison Studies. (n.d.-a). Argentina. World Prison Brief Data. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/argentina

  • International Centre for Prison Studies. (n.d.-b). Australia. World Prison Brief Data. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/australia

  • International Centre for Prison Studies. (n.d.-c). Brazil. World Prison Brief Data. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/brazil

  • International Centre for Prison Studies. (n.d.-d). United States World Prison Brief Data. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/united-states-america

  • Larrauri, E. (2015). Introducción a la Criminología y al sistema penal. Madrid: Trotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Escamilla, M. (2009). Para que el derecho no se detenga a las puertas de los CIE: Análisis del régimen jurídico del internamiento de extranjeros. Anuario de Derecho penal y ciencias penales, 62(1), 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Escamilla, M. (2013). Mujeres en el CIE: Género, inmigración e internamiento. Donostia-San Sebastián: Tercera Prensa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melossi, D. (2013). Punishment and migration between Europe and the USA: A transnational ‘less eligibility’? In J. Simon & R. Sparks (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Punishment and Society (pp. 416–433). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Melossi, D. (2015). Crime, Punishment and Migration. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moffette, D. (2014). Governing immigration through probation: The displacement of borderwork and the assessment of desirability in Spain. Security Dialogue, 45(3), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614530457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffette, D. (2015). Governing irregular migration: Logics and practices in Spanish immigration policy. PhD thesis. Canada: York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monclús Masó, M. (2008). La gestión penal de la inmigración. Buenos Aires: Del Puerto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monclús Masó, M., & Brandariz García, J. A. (2015). Políticas y prácticas de control migratorio: Estudio comparativo del control de los migrantes en los contextos latinoamericano y europeo. Buenos Aires: Didot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, M. M. (2004). Impossible Subjects: Illegal Alien and the Making of Modern America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pueblos Unidos. (2015). CIE y expulsiones exprés: Informe anual 2014. Madrid: Pueblos Unidos. Retrieved May 22, 2016, from www.entreculturas.org

  • Rigo, E. (2005). Citizenship at Europe’s borders: Some reflections on the post-Colonial condition of Europe in the context of EU enlargement. Citizenship Studies, 9(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362102042000325379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodier, C. (2012). Xénophobie business. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, E. (2010). Un deseo apasionado de trabajo más barato y servicial: Migraciones, fronteras y capitalismo. Oviedo: Cambalache.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, E. (2011). Quién invade a quién: Del colonialismo al II Plan África. Oviedo: Cambalache.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainz de la Maza Quintanal, E. (2015). ‘Ultima ratio’: El proceso de expulsión de inmigrantes en situación irregular en España. PhD thesis. Spain: Complutense University of Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio, A. (2015). Terrorizing Latina/o Immigrants: Race, Gender, and Immigration Politics in the Age of Security. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Tomás, J. M. (2014). Hacia un sistema alternativo al internamiento de inmigrantes irregulares. Eunomia, 5, 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segato, R. L. (2007). El color de la cárcel en América Latina: Apuntes sobre la colonialidad de la justicia en un continente en desconstrucción. Nueva sociedad, 208, 142–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (2011). Punishing Race. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez, Y. (2015). Constructing crimmigration: Latino subordination in a ‘post-racial’ world. Ohio State Law Journal, 76(3), 600–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2003). Toward a dictatorship over the poor? Notes on the penalization of poverty in Brazil. Punishment and Society, 5(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/146247450352004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernández Bessa, C., Brandariz García, J.A. (2018). ‘Profiles’ of Deportability: Analyzing Spanish Migration Control Policies from a Neocolonial Perspective. In: Carrington, K., Hogg, R., Scott, J., Sozzo, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65021-0_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65021-0_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65020-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65021-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics