Advertisement

Ontology Engineering

  • David E. ForbesEmail author
  • Pornpit Wongthongtham
  • Chamonix Terblanche
  • Udsanee Pakdeetrakulwong
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 123)

Abstract

Some ontologies represent domain knowledge and organise knowledge into a specific structure e.g. hierarchy, graph, etc. Other ontologies represent formal vocabularies with well-defined axioms that allow further deductions or inferences.

References

  1. Ashraf, J., Hussain, O.K., Hussain, F.K.: A framework for measuring ontology usage on the web. Comp J (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Bechhofer, S., Horrocks, I., Goble, C., Stevens, R.: OilEd: a reason-able ontology editor for the semantic web. In: F. Baader, G. Brewka, T. Eiter (eds.) KI 2001: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Joint German/Austrian Conference on AI Vienna, Austria, September 19–21, 2001 Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 396–408 2001Google Scholar
  3. Bontcheva, K., Tablan, V., Maynard, D., Cunningham, H.: Evolving GATE to meet new challenges in language engineering. Nat. Lang. Eng. 10(3–4), 349–373 (2004). doi: 10.1017/s1351324904003468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Bo, J., Spyns, P., Meersman, R.: Creating a “DOGMAtic” multilingual ontology infrastructure to support a semantic portal. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: OTM 2003 Workshops: OTM Confederated International Workshops, HCI-SWWA, IPW, JTRES,WORM, WMS, and WRSM 2003, Catania, Sicily, Italy, November 3–7, 2003. Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 253–266 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. Dentler, K., Cornet, R., ten Teije, A., de Keizer, N.: Comparison of reasoners for large ontologies in the OWL 2 EL profile. Semant. web 2(2), 71–87 (2011). doi: 10.3233/sw-2011-0034 Google Scholar
  6. Deray, T., Verheyden, P.: Towards a semantic integration of medical relational databases by using ontologies: a case study. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: OTM 2003 Workshops: OTM Confederated International Workshops, HCI-SWWA, IPW, JTRES,WORM, WMS, and WRSM 2003, Catania, Sicily, Italy, November 3–7, 2003. Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 137–150 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. AAAI-97 Spring Symposium Series, Stanford University, EEUU (1997)Google Scholar
  8. Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: International Workshop on Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, Padova, Italy (1993)Google Scholar
  9. Gruninger, M., Fox, M.: Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In: IJCAI’95, Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, 13 Apr 1995Google Scholar
  10. Hepp, M.: Possible ontologies: how reality constrains the development of relevant ontologies. Internet Comput 11(1), 90–96 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martins, H., Silva, N.: A User-driven and a Semantic-based Ontology Mapping Evolution Approach. ICEIS (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Musen, M.A.: The protege project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters 1(4), 4–12 (2015). doi: 10.1145/2757001.2757003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mustafa, J., Demey, J., Meersman, R.: On using conceptual data modeling for ontology engineering. In: S. Spaccapietra, S. March, K. Aberer (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics I, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 185–207 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. Pinto, H.S., Steffen, S., Tempich, C.: DILIGENT: Towards a Fine-grained Methodology for Distributed, Loosely-controlled and Evolving Engineering of oNTologies. ECAI (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Stojanovic, N., Studer, R., Stojanovic, L.: An Approach for Step-By-Step Query Refinement in the Ontology-Based Information Retrieval. Web Intelligence, 2004. WI 2004. In: Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on, 20–24 Sept 2004Google Scholar
  16. Sure, Y., Erdmann, M., Angele, J., Staab, S., Studer, R., Wenke, D.: OntoEdit: Collaborative Ontology Development for the Semantic Web. In: Horrocks, I. I., Hendler, J. (eds.) The Semantic Web—ISWC 2002: First International Semantic Web Conference Sardinia, Italy, June 9–12, 2002 Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 221–235 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. Swartout, B., Patil, R., Knight, K., Russ, T.: Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies. In: Ontological Engineering, AAAI-97 Spring Symposium Series (1997)Google Scholar
  18. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Know. Eng. Rev. 11(2) (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Forbes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pornpit Wongthongtham
    • 2
  • Chamonix Terblanche
    • 3
  • Udsanee Pakdeetrakulwong
    • 4
  1. 1.Independent ResearcherPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  3. 3.City of CockburnPerthAustralia
  4. 4.Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat UniversityNakhon PathomThailand

Personalised recommendations